Talk:Marietje Schaake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Original research

Many thanks for the feedback and improvement. What can we do about 'original research' and to which part does it refer to exactly? Stefanbrussel (talk) 14:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Original research" may be all those parts that are not supported by reliable sources. What we can do about them, for instance, is to remove them.
talk) 17:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Only one paragraph uses references, the rest of the article has no source references whatsoever, hence "This article needs additional citations for verification." And because two of the article's contributors have declared a professional connection with the article's subject, I have also marked the article for possible original research. The best way to resolve both issues is to provide additional references to published sources, ideally for all facts in the article. – Editør (talk) 20:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marietje Schaake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]