Talk:Microsoft Ants

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Disputed content

I dispute the last section of this article. While it is true that few active players currently exist, I had no problem starting a game today. I was also told by a player that most people are waiting for WCG to launch their Ants lobby.

I dispute the "Final Frontier?" section as I feel it is more of an advertisement rather than being informative regarding Microsoft Ants. --Zygar2k6 20:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay?

How about a gamplay section? All the history is nice, but what do you do in the game??

talk) 06:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

its there 22wrench (talk) 08:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the spam

The links section contained several links to sites with almost nothing on them but links to the commercial sites, which also had links in that section, and in the article. I erased all of that. This spam site inserted itself as an add elsewhere, by its own name as well as its new name which its old site links to. Dream Focus 10:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Script kiddies"

Can someone please eliminate this term from the article? It's probably correct, but I feel such derogatory/opinionated terminology has no place in a professional encyclopedia. 67.174.153.199 (talk) 20:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You're totally right and the Wikipedia article about script kiddies calls the word pejorative, too. 188.195.136.207 (talk) 19:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to remove the advert warning?

I reviewed the article and changed some of the most judgemental words and phrases (but not all, for example I couldn't get around the "cute characters"). Could please some of the more experienced Wikipedians check if this article is neutral now and remove the advert warning if appropriate? Thanks! 188.195.136.207 (talk) 19:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so... 22wrench (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microsoft Ants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219064732/http://ants.blinkk.com/history.shtml to http://ants.blinkk.com/history.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]