Talk:Midlands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconHerefordshire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWarwickshire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWorcestershire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconShropshire High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
inactive
.CoventryWikipedia:WikiProject CoventryTemplate:WikiProject CoventryCoventry articles
WikiProject iconGeography Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list:
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Sheffield?

The article talks about Sheffield being the "capital of the north midlands", but I would argue most people would consider it as being part of the North and not the Midlands. Also how relevant is a 1911 entry to the Encyclopedia Britannica to the present definition of the midlands. I would argue that a much better way of estimating the territorial extent of the Midlands would be to look at the BBC's regional TV areas of the West and East Midlands. Whilst a bit sketchy, I would argue that it is a much better definition than that provided by a 102 year old encylopedia entry and should at the very least be included.

File:BBC satellite regions.png

--Redadder123 (talk) 14:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree that most would consider Sheffield as being in Northern England since I'm originally from Sheffield myself (so I consider myself as a northerner) but at the same time, we can't deny either that to some extent, the city has occasionally been included (or considered as) as part of the informal North Midlands area even if just rarely. And I might also point out that while most consider Sheffield to be in the north, some people in the far north of England (e.g. Tyneside, Cumbria or Northumberland) would more likely consider Sheffield to be more central geographically (which isn't surprising to me as Sheffield through firmly northern, almost lies exactly between Berwick upon Tweed and Southampton). And since this article gives mention to the South Midlands including counties in Southern England like Oxfordshire, Bedfordshire or Buckinghamshire (though I personally think they are too far south to be considered as such), theres no reason why Sheffield can't be included briefly (I have given mention to Sheffield differently as the bits of Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire surrounding Sheffield to the west and east are often considered to be northern), and in any case due to recent changes in the North Midlands article and since South Yorkshire and Sheffield are both mentioned there, I have mentioned that the North Midlands to a slight degree includes the southern part of South Yorkshire (and Cheshire). Broman178 (talk) 11:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too many towns

before listing every single big town here can we consider what a reader would find useful? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.31.242.18 (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Some aren't even big and some are just suburbs/dormitory towns. It needs slimming down. How about only county towns, biggest in the county if different and besides that nowhere with a population under 50,000,. Is there guidance anywhere?

talk) 21:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

I've removed the word notable, I intend to give the list a major pruning sometime soon.

talk) 06:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
]


I've changed the list my choices were based on, cities, county towns, towns of over 50,000 people and Stratford as it is very well known across the world. I've probably missed somewhere, so please correct, but please keep it sensible.

talk) 17:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Whoever called it the "English Midlands"?

Sorry but I suspect this title is wrong and probably a Wiki fudge - it is never to my knowledge called the "English Midlands", just the "Midlands". So it should either be "Midlands" if it is agreed as the primary topic, or "Midlands (England)". --Bermicourt (talk) 11:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite right Bermicourt - you'll find plenty of examples if you search on the web and the phrase is used in everyday life though I'd agree that 'The Midlands' is more commonly found. Geopersona (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South Carolina & Tasmania) are named similarly to the proposed move. --Kurtle (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Map

I added another map. The earlier one is fine, but not enough to point out where in England the Midlands are if you're unfamiliar with English geography. /Julle (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever called it the "The Midlands, England"?

Moving "English Midlands" to "Midlands (England)" is one thing: the phrase "the English Midlands" is used, though I will admit that in most contexts a plain "the Midlands" is much more common; even so, there are indeed other Midlands so a disambiguating "(England)" is fair enough in the title (cf.

Midlands (South Carolina), Midlands (Tasmania) etc.). But as for "the Midlands, England", I can't recall ever seeing that formulation used anywhere but here. And why was there no discussion before this latest change was made? -- Picapica (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Absolutely, it's "the Midlands" so 'Midlands (England)' would make far more sense to me.
Gwladys24 (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Requested move 23 March 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 08:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


– My primary reason for this proposal is that I believe that the title violates

WP:THE. In The Hague, for instance, "The" is treated as an integral part of the name and is written in uppercase even in the middle of a sentence. But for the Netherlands, that is not the case. I think the Midlands are much more similar to the Netherlands in this respect. Note that the region is frequently referred to as "Midlands" alone in titles
, which would be impossible if "The" were an inseparable part of the name.

As the disambiguation page is in the way, something has to be done about it. Personally, I'd favor just

Midlands (England) as superior to the present situation, as my intention is not to make this a dispute about the primary topic of "Midlands" but rather a proposal to remove "The" from the title. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 19:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

Historic counties in infobox

There is a small group of editors determined to push the ancient counties at every turn. The topic has been discussed ad nauseam and the consistent and continuing consensus is that this information has curiosity value at best. It certainly doesn't belong in the infobox in a section assigned to current administrative entities. Accordingly, I will be bold and take it out of the infobox and move it down the page under archaeology or something. If anyone disagrees, please take it up yet again at

talk) 16:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]


a map showing more context please

A map showing more context would be more helpful to a global audience. Can someone please find a map that shows the Midlands on the whole island including Scotland and Wales? seeing the location on an isolated map of England is disorienting and not very informative. Irtapil (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a second map to the infobox -- Dr Greg  talk  20:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nice map Dr Greg. Lots of maps on here give so little context. Spot on fella. Sirhissofloxley (talk) 23:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mercia

I’m sorry, but although the borders do correspond to Mercia, broadly, I don’t think there is that strong of a link between the two. I’ve never met someone who would say Mercia is the Midlands. 57.190.1.2 (talk) 07:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Midlands&oldid=1218721619"