Talk:Mother Solomon
Mother Solomon is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by Averageuntitleduser (talk) at 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: Wyandot nanny (1816–1890) |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ohio Low‑importance | |||||||
|
Note for reviewers
I do not have access to Marsh 1984, a quite detailed biography. Still, I believe the article is broad enough for GAN. Much of the book is repeated or summarized in Marvin Jr. 2015 and Labelle 2021, and the two Croneis 1991 articles are practically stand-ins. I am in the process of contacting Ohian libraries that may somehow lend the book, but we'll have to go without it for now. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mother Solomon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
This seems like an interesting subject, and I'm more than happy to return the favor for your review of Worlds (Porter Robinson album)! Expect comments in the next couple of days. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Much appreciated! By the way, I recently received the biography mentioned in the article through WP:RX. It would be useful for fleshing out details, which I'll be getting around to, but I still believe the article addresses the main points. Anywho, hope you enjoy! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)]
- @Averageuntitleduser: That sounds great! Would you prefer to incorporate material from that source before or after the review? I'm happy to put this on hold and come back to it later if that would suit you better. Let me know either way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll do that now! Expect me to be done within two to three days. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser: That sounds great! Would you prefer to incorporate material from that source before or after the review? I'm happy to put this on hold and come back to it later if that would suit you better. Let me know either way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)