Talk:Murray Gell-Mann

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Physics: Biographies Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. Systems High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page. Judaism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .University of Southern CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving Murray Gell-Mann was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 26 May 2019.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Is it true that, in his book "the Quark and the Jaguar" Murray Gell-Mann "settles his account" with singer Pete Seeger and mention the experiment of Alain Aspect without naming him ?

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Murray Gell-Mann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120418195201/http://www.iheu.org/american-humanist-association-building-momentum to http://www.iheu.org/american-humanist-association-building-momentum
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101229180532/http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=AWARDS_carty to http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=AWARDS_carty
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110412063007/http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/gel0int-1 to http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/gel0int-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect have a mention anywhere on Wikipedia? Leitmotiv (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned in Talk:Murray_Gell-Mann/Archive_1#Possible items for inclusion?.

It also appears in Wikiquote:

Wikiquote has quotations related to Murray Gell-Mann#Quotes about Gell-Mann.

Davemck (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect

Bmax52 (talk) 18:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gell-Mann amnesia effect goes to M. Chrichton. The content of this effect is thin, and from Crichton alone, who for fun pasted the name of Gell-Mann on it. The Murray Gell-Mann amnesia effect is wikipedia garbage. Herbmuell (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Well I missed that most of the lines lacking sources have a template. If there are other concerns that are not touched by the templates, indicate it here. --

talk) 20:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

It was a big mistake of Murray to get involved in linguistics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.193.136 (talk) 09:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhlen's work is seen with suspicion by most linguists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.193.136 (talk) 09:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]