This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive
for the week of October 2, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article
NASA Edge was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 September 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into NASA. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
NASAcast was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 September 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into NASA. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Text and/or other creative content from NASA was copied or moved into List of NASA aircraft with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
RM, NASA → National Aeronautics and Space Administration, No consensus, 24 August 2006, discussion
RM, NASA → National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Not moved, 5 March 2015, discussion
RM, NASA → National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Not moved, 7 April 2022, discussion
The rationale behind the request is: "Important article, old recording is eight years old and very outdated".
History of NASA article
I just finished a massive rewrite of the NASA history section, cleaning it up significantly and making it chronological readable. However, the history of NASA is too big to be just a section on this article. If there are any talk page lurkers who want to create a
History of NASA page, this would be a good time to do it and then link it as the main article under the history sub-section here. Garuda28 (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
Oppose, as every time a split is made for a page it will lose readers. The history of NASA is very long because NASA's history is long. Should be all on one page, the main NASA page. I'm going to remove the verylong tag because it actually asks editors to make a split, which is a problem with the tag not only on this page but pretty much any major article that it's used on. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:51, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. This rewrite was already as massive consolidation from what it replaced. Garuda28 (talk) 23:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It may be a good rewrite, thanks, although it seems the Mercury and Gemini, and even Apollo and Skylab information could be added back or expanded. Can some of the major editors here check it. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
it says the budget for the ISS was originally going to be $17.4 Alex Miranda52.314159 (talk) 22:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was NASA's plan originally, but plans can change. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
I'm not certain whether these sources, rather than secondary sources as currently used, are preferred for this. Are there reliable secondary sources easily available? (sdsds - talk) 04:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that in this context the use of a primary source falls within the criteria of both
in the moon landing section, at paragraph 5, line 4, the word apollo is spelled appollo. could somebody fix that quick Andpug1 (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. BilCat (talk) 22:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)]
Done — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)