Talk:Neil Heywood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Teetotaller or just not heavy drinker?

The article says friends described Heywood as a teetotaller. I think I remember reading a media report which just said that friends said he was not a heavy drinker. Perhaps someone could straighten out that discrepancy? Nandt1 (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on this, I now see that the Telegraph story cited in the article says that his friends described him as "not a serious drinker". This does not equate to "a teetotaller" and I propose to amend the article. Nandt1 (talk) 00:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New article?

I'm wondering whether a new article is warranted along the lines of Neil Heywood Affair or Neil Heywood Incident (it can't be called "murder" as that is as yet unproven), the rationale being that there is a lot of background about Bo Xilai and Gu Kailai in Dalian tied in with Jiang Weiping's article in Xinwei Monthly that started the whole thing. Comments? ► Philg88 ◄ talk 08:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don;t think we need a whole new article. We should rename this one, and focus on the incident itself, rather than the person.--vvarkey (talk) 10:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two issues

First, on the above, I frankly don't see the need for a separate article on the scandal. Poor Mr. Heywood wouldn't warrant an article on Wikipedia at all if not for the scandal: it is, sadly, the only reason he is noteworthy. One article should be plenty.

Secondly, I am concerned that some of our contributors are picking up all sorts of questionable stories from the press and putting them straight into this article as if they were fact, without any effort to sort out the basis of the reports in question. As one example among several, the claim that Gu visited Heywood's widow with armed guards in tow to persuade her to agree to an immediate crematiion was reported here as fact, when if one digs into the Daily Mail story given as the source, it turns out to depend on "internet reports". Let's please try to remember our standards. Nandt1 (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the Daily Mail the one that has often proven to not be credible? When people work with organisations like MI6, even on a loose basis of fee/info, there is always blurriness because there are many who have an interest in smokescreens. I had two relatives whose deaths were not clarified and neither had anything to do with secret info. It's just a fact of life that some things can never be cleared up. 2001:8003:AD40:8400:E8FD:5393:696C:5D5E (talk) 06:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on the source veracity, the Telegraph is sailing close to the wind too with their source "briefed by government sources." The whole story may be just a smokescreen to discredit Bo and Gu since the internet rumours surfacing on Chinese sites have not been squashed by the central authorities. Whether the real facts will ever be known is a tough one to call since any resulting trials will no doubt be held in camera for reasons of national security :) ► Philg88 ◄ talk 19:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Age of Heywood

Was this guy really only 41 when he died. Or is the picture not right. He looks more like 60. Rlbarton (talk) 13:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 08:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neil Heywood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]