Talk:Noah (band)

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pop music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians. Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Andreopa 10:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed KK's name, as he had nothing to do with this. He just sang it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging after a decade. Why was this section removed? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope the author of this page is not offended but I edited this page for style and grammar. There were quite a few errors here. If you want to discuss this further, please do. (I am an English teacher and I was just trying to help. =)

The article doesn't state when/how Indra joined the band (member of Topi? later?) - Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Noah (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080503043526/http://www.equinoxdmd.com/peterpan/default.htm to http://equinoxdmd.com/peterpan/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox contains a parameter |additional_memberss= (with two ss), which is an obvious typo, but the infobox only supports current and past members. This additional list is set to:

• Rio (Drums)
• Lanlan (Bass, backing vocals)
• Iwan Sukma (Rhythm Guitar, backing vocals)

all three of which appear to be current members in the bar chart. Would someone confirm this and, if so, move them to the correct parameter? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 12:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I accidently reviewed this article for GA as part of the June Backlog Drive. I was supposed to review Keterkaitan Keterikatan, which I did, but I didn't want the review for this article to go to waste, so I'm pasting my GA review here. Hopefully, it will be of some help, which is the reason we review articles, anyway, right? This is by no means an "official" GA review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

   There are serious grammatical errors throughout this article. To be honest, I'm tempted to quick fail it because of the grammar, but I wanted to give you an oppportunity to address them. I suggest that you ask some editors to copyedit this article.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism

   ):

   See below for refs check.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Because most of your references are inaccessible to me, I'm going to AGF that this article is broad enough.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No evidence of edit warring.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Only 3 images used (the image in the infobox is used twice, which is okay), probably because there aren't many available, and they are all labelled correctly.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The current version is not at all ready to be promoted to GA, mostly due to prose and reference problems. I'll keep it open for the customary 7 days, but I'll fail it after that unless there's negotiation to keep it open longer.

Ref check: Most of the sources in this article are not in English, so I'm unable to check them, but I did check the few that are in English. Below are problems I found.

• Ref4 sends you to the Malaymail home page, not the article, probably because the link is broken/lost.
• Refs 49, 73, 75, 81 are broken. All these broken links are concerning, because when so many of the sources I was able to check are broken, it most likely means that many others are as well. I suggest that you not only fix these links, but go through all of them and make sure they work and that they suppport your claims.