Talk:Oceanus Procellarum

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Moon / Solar System Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. This article is supported by Moon task force. This article is supported by Solar System task force. Volcanoes Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New data from Grail indicates that this was feature not created by impact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.207.163.243 (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about the Sea of Storms redirect; is this a common enough term that people use for the "Oceanus", or can it be migrated to the Category:Wheel of Time places category and fleshed out? Can make it a disambig page as well, of course... nae'blis _(talk) 05:46, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There's three Moon-related articles currently using it to link here and one Wheel-of-time related article using it to link here, so I think a disambiguation page would probably be the best way to deal with it. I'll set one up, flesh out Sea of Storms (Wheel of Time) with however much the subject warrants. Bryan 07:29, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(since I just bypassed all the disambiguation links, for the record these were the articles that linked to

Falme) Bryan 07:36, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

Excellent, got the new page started up. Thanks! nae'blis _(talk) 23:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In this source the size of Oceanus Procellarum is said to be 1,692,000 km² (yes, it do look crappy, but if you take a look about the author, I think you would agree that the source is likely to be correct). In this article it is said to be more than twice as big: 4,000,000 km², but no source is presented. Normally I would just change it, but the author (whom is a administrator) also put it in another list, so I guess hes pretty sure about the numbers. Perhaps it is based on a different definition? Please present a source in a week or so, or I will change the numbers in both the list and in this article, according to the source presented above. Cheers Jopparn (talk) 10:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does the Etymology section (which only discusses renaming it from Procellarum to Gagarin) have to do with the etymology??? A proper etymology section (ie., the origin and meaning of the current name as given in the article) should be in its place instead of some comment about a 50 year old proposal for a rename. — al-Shimoni (talk) 22:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If that "fact" is anything, it's not-notable trivia. I just deleted it. 123.208.14.37 (talk) 04:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just like Borders of the oceans. Jidanni (talk) 23:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]