Talk:Package format

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Package format article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. Linux High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The most popular format for

.

In contrast,

each piece of software to their own specficiations, while at the same time managing upgrades and requirements. This sort of software management is unique and not common.

Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between recipe packages and source packages? I had never heard of recipe packages before reading the article. Gobo Linux has recipes, but they seem more like a type of source packages. –82.203.170.147 13:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the page

does contain some additional information beyond a list. therefore the pages may as well be merged together. 58.47.183.147 (talk) 06:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC) eMBee[reply]

I agree, it should be merged. - Ahunt (talk) 11:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, there are some package formats that have no associated package manager, in particular: AppImages, AppShell and

klik, therefore I don't think they belong at List of software package management systems. --Jerebin (talk) 00:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

It seems klik is in fact already at the List of software package management systems article under "meta-package manager". However, I'm pretty sure klik can't be considered a package manager, neither the software I mentioned above. --Jerebin (talk) 00:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is

being the biggest ones in terms of installed systems. Plus if Debian's package format is used as an example, its a disservice to users to not mention RPM when enthusiast package formats that aren't very notable like Puppy's and Pardus' are used. 142.196.225.209 (talk) 23:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A number of unsourced entries were cleaned up a while ago. If you have a

reference you can cite it can be added. - Ahunt (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Docker, Flatpak, OVF?

Kindly please complete the table --Ghettobuoy (talk) 01:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is why Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit! Just cite refs when you add it, please. - Ahunt (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to remove ORB for the table of package formats. I have never heard of this format. (I recognize most of the other formats in the table.) There is no citation in the page for it. The ORB link just redirects to this page, so you can't learn about it even if you wanted to. I think it should be removed. I just wanted to mention this in case someone wants to add ORB back with some information about it. 71.225.252.204 (talk) 04:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]