Talk:Parliamentary system
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Redirect
Any reason
Or perhaps add this to the disambig page for Parliament. Peyna 19:14:44, 2005-08-29 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
"Parliamentary" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Help me to revert this latest "vandalism"
Here look this trash edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1182276512&oldid=1181816650&title=Parliamentary_system
The problem: I would simply revert, but some good people like @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz edited out a little but not most of that trash, instead of me reverting the latest edits of the good guys, I'll leave this warning to get them to do it. If not, I'm a noob, so the simplest path is for me to revert until to before the vandalism, but I wait until you decide the best path. Santropedro (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Santropedro, I was editing on my phone when I did that partial revert, and obviously didn't notice how many irrelevant wikilinks had been inserted. Thanks for drawing it to my attention. I think I've cleaned them all up. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing that job! I came back after remembering this situation. I sent you a thank you notification for your edit. See you. Santropedro (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Biology
What is reproduction 2409:408A:2E8D:7C96:0:0:6CB:1406 (talk) 00:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)