Talk:Pazzi conspiracy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 12 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emmybunny.

Above undated message substituted from

talk) 02:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Francesco Nori

In the general information box, it lists Francesco Nori as being killed during the Pazzi Conspiracy. However, by clicking his name to his Wikipedia page, it says he died in the 17th century. Over a hundred years from when the Pazzi Conspiracy occurred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of Neph (talkcontribs) 14:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing that, Kingdom of Neph – the blue link was of course taking you to a page about a different Francesco Nori. It's easy for these mistakes to creep in, and very useful if someone takes the trouble to mention them – thank you! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Popular Culture

I noticed that the history shows frequent additions and removal to the popular culture section. What is considered to be valid popular culture references and what is not? 2600:8801:3B00:4B9:CD77:B1C:BDBB:46B7 (talk) 03:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We don't include
trivia in this project, and "popular culture" sections are usually the epitome of trivia. If this conspiracy is mentioned in a video game, then the place to cover that would be the article on the game. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
So... how a event is depicted in media is completelly unimportant for you? That's not right. It's nothing about trivia but if an event is important enough to get depicted in Books, Movies or games this should be described. --2A02:2028:82A:2201:444B:E516:BBA:A6B8 (talk) 10:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There have certainly been numerous novels in which the plot features, and maybe films too. These should be included, along with notable paintings etc. The section is currently called "In culture". Johnbod (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I COMPLETELY agree. All the historical figures described here in any detail probably have pop culture sections in their own articles. How is a conspiracy any different to any other historical event or person...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble Korhedron (talkcontribs) 16:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy Theory

This should be listed under conspiracy theories since there's no real proof or evidence of the plot. 97.115.73.229 (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]