Talk:Pistol Shrimp Games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Requested move 3 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved to

WP:BARTENDER, as the most well-supported option of those provided during the discussion. BD2412 T 15:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]


WP:DIFFCAPS. The current name is likely to be confused with Alpheidae, and may frustrate readers who are expecting to land on the article for the primary topic. Disambiguation of a single capitalised letter compared to Pistol shrimp is unlikely to be sufficient. Melmann 12:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes, the article should be renamed. I am sorry for creating article by the name "Pistol Shrimp" without mentioning that this is a game company. Celtoi (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support move to Pistol Shrimp Games or Pistol Shrimp (company) per several above. Dicklyon (talk) 03:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Pistol Shrimp Games as natural disambiguation. While DIFFCAPS is permitted, such a distinction is rarely going to be a good choice unless the distinction is well recognised - eg iron maiden v Iron maiden. Low viewing for the company does not support this and user search entries will often not consciously enter caps. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
information Note to the discussion closer: I'm not sure what exactly is the procedure for situations like this, but if you were to find consensus to move, but instead boldly changed the new name to Pistol Shrimp Games, I would support your actions as uncontroversial move, and would not see it as a contentious move, at least as far as I'm concerned. Melmann 20:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not unusual for the outcome of an RM discussion to be somewhat different from the initial proposal. This is routine. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.