Talk:Ptolemy Ceraunus

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Egypt Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list: edit history watch purge Needed articles. We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have. Cleanup. To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates? Standardize the Chronology. A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563) Stub sorting Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . . Data sorting. This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library. Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Could someone who knows the subject area help expand/correct the

1 - "In 279, a new enemy appeared in what is now northern Bulgaria: the Galatians. They belonged to the La Tène-culture, which had its heartland in northeastern France and southern Germany. In the fifth and fourth centuries, it had expanded to the west into the countries where people spoke a language that modern scholars call 'Celtic'. Because the Greeks used the word 'Celt' to describe all barbarians in the west (except for those on the British isles), twentieth-century scholars have used the word 'Celtic' to describe all La Tène-people, even when they did not live in the west and did not speak a Celtic language. Therefore, the Galatians are sometimes called Celts, which is in fact incorrect but has the advantage that people immediately understand that the Galatians were savages." and "In the spring of 279, their leader Bolgius invaded Macedonia, and when Keraunos offered battle, he was defeated, captured, and decapitated."

3 - "The Galatians were in their origin a part of that great Celtic migration which invaded Macedon, led by the 'second' Brennus, a Gaulish chief. He invaded Greece in 281 BCE with a huge warband and was turned back in the nick of time from plundering the temple of Apollo at Delphi. At the same time, another Gaulish group were migrating with their women and children through Thrace. They had split off from Brennus' Gauls in 279 BCE, and had migrated into Thrace under their leaders Leonnorius and Lutarius. These Gaulish invaders appeared in Asia Minor in 278–277 BCE; others invaded Macedon, killed the Ptolemaic king Ptolemy Ceraunus but were eventually ousted by Antigonus Gonatas, the grandson of the defeated diadoch Antigonus the One-Eyed."

I've also copied this to Talk:Galatia. Thanks for any advice/help. Carcharoth 16:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• These are chiefly disagreements about the order of events; the Gaulish attack on Delphi and the fall of Ptolemy Keraunos probably come down to us through different sources, and the question of whether the two mentions of Gauls are the same band is a matter of interpretation. Both versions should probably be represented in the article.
• I believe the assertion that Galatian was not a Celtic language to be a nationalist absurdity of some kind, but I defer to those who are better read on the subject. Septentrionalis 16:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I don't think we can call the assertion a nationalist absurdity. The article is written by Jona Lendering, a respected scholar, and her website, Livius,org, is considered among the best in absolute regarding classical studies. This statement probably represents a view in contemporary scholarship; but in my opinion it should be treated with caution, as it appears a quite new theory to me.

For a full list of the sources on the death of Ptolemy I advice looking this page, where they are all the sources with the links to the texts of the classical sources online [1]--Aldux 17:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. Though I raised the question, I'm not going to try and write anything, as this does look like it will require rather careful research, which I'm hoping someone else might be able to do at some point. Carcharoth 20:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the link that Aldux provided ([2]), I see that there are several Ptolemies mentioned there: Ptolemaeus Ceraunus (=

Speaking of which... I wonder if I could solicit comments (from both of you) on what I've done at Ptolemy (disambiguation). I have expanded the page a fair bit, as I was annoyed at having to click back and forth between the links to try and get clear in my mind when and where all these Ptolemies were, and what the links (if any) were between them. I fear that what I have done goes beyond what a disambiguation page should be; I believe is is suggested that a disambiguation page shouldn't really link to anything other than the things it is disambiguating between. As I've been expanding the disambiguation page, I've wanted to add more links to explain things and lead people off into reading about other areas. I guess I'm edging towards an article that could be called "History of the name Ptolemy"! Oh, and Ptolemy Keraunos is easily the most interesting of the Ptolemies! Along with Ptolemy of Mauretania. I think I'm going to have Ptolemies on the brain for the next few days!! :-) Carcharoth 20:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are different; as you have aleady undrstood, Ptolemaeus Ceraunus is

Ptolemy Keraunos, than there is a Ptolemy son of the former king Lysimachus, the Ptolemy who punishes Zoilus is Ptolemy II Philadelphus, the Ptolemaeus I who sends Theodorus is Ptolemy I Soter

, as for the last I believe that he also is Ptolemy II Philadelphus.

Regarding the disambiguation page, while there's nothing bad, on the contrary, to give a brief description of each; but I must object regards adding external links. This said, it's a formidable improvement. --Aldux 00:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]