Talk:Ranga P. Dias

This article was nominated for deletion on June 29, 2021. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just a quick note to say that this page is filling up with unsupported and partisan comments "Dias says..." etc. Due a clean up? PinOats (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And e.g. "Dias has developed a new method to detect the superior test of superconductivity."

That's meaningless... PinOats (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PinOats, I agree, significant sentiment is leaking into the article. Xirtam Esrevni (talk) 08:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Is this possible: "In 2022, James Hamlin, a physicist at the University of Florida, alleged that Dias may have copied data in a 2021 paper from an experiment on a different material in his 2013 Ph.D. thesis"?

Date of Ph.D. thesis: 2013

Date of new paper: 2021

Regards,

Animée — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:BE80:4000:3173:1441:9951:FBCF (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00716-2 Written by the Nature News team, which is editorially independent of Nature. McKay (talk) 03:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about how to add all that into the article. Firestar464 (talk) 13:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]