This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Please fix "pounds" into metric units. It is plain stupid to use those values today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.252.172.74 (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of history; let's not lose it
The article has a lot of statements about publicly-announced plans of the company at various points in time, particularly statements made in 2018, 2019, and 2020. The article is decidedly short of sourced information about what the company has been able to actually accomplish: build and operationalize facilities, develop prototypes, test rocket engines. This is okay (for now) and I would expect we can begin to find/locate sources that show what the company has actually done, and get much of that brought up to date, especially with the large capital raise (in two phases) now, and the apparent recent interest of a number of editors, including myself.
But we should be careful not to lose the historical information about the company (what is planned and when, etc.) when we get new/better current (2021) company information. Let's add the new info when we find it, and can cite it, but let's not replace and thus lose the older information about the company in the earliest five years of the companies existence. Cheers. N2e (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]