Talk:Richard Baker (broadcaster)

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it (including people of London) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. Journalism Low‑importance London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving Richard Baker (broadcaster) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 November 2018.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

He definitely lived there circa 1970, in Hadley Green (as a kid I lived a few doors from him). Grutness...wha? 22:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in the article. Is there any source? But does it really matter? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter? Yes it does. Everything matters. Is it important? Perhaps not, but let the reader judge that. MartiniShaw (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If Baker had once lived in a bedsit for a month in Hadley Green would the reader want or need to know?

WP:RS for this fact? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk

)

If someone can find a couple of sources - maybe using local newspapers and/or maybe something less obvious - of local celebrity stuff he did in Barnet, that would maybe put this discussion to bed. What Baker did in Barnet would be part of the public Richard Baker. On the other hand if he simply slipped into Barnet on the late night train and lived quietly under a Barnet stone till the time came to get back to the studio, then maybe the Barnet connection isn't too significant. Charles01 (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wholly agree. Although Hadley Green doesn't seem to have many stones, only acid grassland? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That guideline says this (my emphasis added): "Anyone born within the past 115 years is covered by this policy unless a reliable source has confirmed their death. Generally, this policy does not apply to material concerning people who are confirmed dead by reliable sources. The only exception would be for people who have recently died, in which case the policy can extend for an indeterminate period beyond the date of death—six months, one year, two years at the outside." Doesn't this apply here? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]