Talk:Rosa Gumataotao Rios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Government Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.
WikiProject iconJoe Biden Low‑importance
WikiProject iconRosa Gumataotao Rios is within the scope of WikiProject Joe Biden, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to Joe Biden. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

I have updated the article with as many public sources as I could find and, more importantly, structured a template to input additional information as it becomes available; it will still need some general tweaking, especially in the area of current events. Hopefully, that will do for now to at least get it out of the "stub" class.The Original Historygeek (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal info

I reverted the edit that took out her husband's full name as it was without merit (or comment)- especially given the public sources included in the article which also list his full name. I removed the use of his first name later in the section (as was done in the original edit that I reverted) since it was not needed and too familiar for a biographical article anyway. I left the edit concerning her residence in Fremont first, then Castro Valley stand as it appears to be correct despite the Somos Primos article which clearly states the reverse. The rest of the sources, and even the employment chronology in the SP article support the edit. The SP article is also wrong concerning her father (which it confuses with her husband and also gets the ethnicity wrong) and should probably be removed altogether. Other sources already in the article can be used to take up the slack). The Original Historygeek (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems completely bias and one sided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:137.150.48.89 21:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the above anonymous comment made today to the bottom of this page since it was originally misplaced at the top, above the banner. As to its merit, it would be nice to know what problem the commenter has so that it can be worked on.The Original Historygeek (talk) 03:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]