Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen (1912)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Prinz Eugen (1912) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Austro-Hungarian battleships Habsburg, Babenberg, Árpád, Prinz Eugen, Tegetthoff and Viribus Unitis participated in the bombardment of Ancona ? | |
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suvıvıng parts
I know that some guns of the Austrıan shıps where included ın the German Atlantıc wall as thıs shıp was gıven to france ıt ıs lıkly that thıs where guns of the Prınz Eugen. Flag and parts of the shıp where gıven to the German Prınz Eugen of the II WW. J —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.168.92 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 1 October 2006
GA Review
- This review is Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ~]
I will be reviewing this article shortly. ~]
- herefor criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (lists):
- Looks good.
- a (prose): b (
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- More citations in the "Construction" section would be nice.
- Fixed. Added some Conway's and Sokol's.--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 23:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- More citations in the "Construction" section would be nice.
- a (references): b (citations to
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No problems here.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Looks neutral to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars detected.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- Images look good and illustrate the article.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Looks good, but I have one comment pointed out above. I will pass it once the comment has been responded to. ~]
- Pass/Fail:
It looks good, so I'll pass it. Congratulations! ~]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090805101618/http://www.hicon.pl:80/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html to http://www.hicon.pl/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
Pictures in article
It seems that no one has yet noticed that in this article ONE and the same picture is used for TWO different events and times: "Prinz Eugen in 1914" and "Prinz Eugen underway on a rare departure from port on 28 June 1917" - SAME BOW WAVE!!! 80.151.9.187 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)