Talk:Sara Seager

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Canada: Toronto Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance). Astronomy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women scientists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is currently a work in progress. I apologize for not being able to complete it. Also the section regarding copyright infringement has been removed, though the material in question comes from an education website which claims no copyright on the material. - Author.

I think the accomplishments listed show notability, certainly I don't think this article qualifies for speedy deletion. --Darksun 15:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, the accomplishments are fairly small, the article reads more like a CV than an article. There is nothing notable about this person. If we listed every scientist at every institure then Wiki would be over-run by un-notables. Just because someone has won a couple of awards in a field doesnt make them notable. Sorry but i just think a research scientist is not notable. --GazMan7 15:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Check
  WP:BIO - the person clearly passes notability tests. Take this to AFD, it doesn't qualify for speedy. --Darksun 15:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• • Sorry i have to disagree, this person is not notable, no internal links demonstrate this....— Preceding unsigned comment added by GazMan7 (talk • contribs)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sara Seager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515121347/http://www.amesteam.arc.nasa.gov/NewsArticles/TIME_Space_Allamandola_25MostInfluentialPeopleinSpace.pdf to http://www.amesteam.arc.nasa.gov/NewsArticles/TIME_Space_Allamandola_25MostInfluentialPeopleinSpace.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]