Talk:Sardinian dhole

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconExtinction Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconMammals Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

image

I've removed the crayon drawing. We should find an image of a fossil or a technical artist's recreation. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, there are a whole bunch of pictures of fossils of Sardinian dholes on the internet, but they are all under copyright. Same case with technical artists' recreations. I drew the drawing, and I have tried my best. And it is not a crayon drawing. It is in pencil.--Scottishwildcat12 (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cuon

Cuon, not fox. The Sardinian fox is a different animal. It's the Vulpes vulpes ichnusae G.S. Miller, 1907. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulpes_vulpes_ichnusae --Jack2008 (talk) 12:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

topic

You are correct, Hemiauchenia, I messed up. I had seen that the lede was about the species, and the taxobox is about the genus, and made the wrong assumption without reading further. However, there is still that disconnect. The lede needs a change to be about the genus, not the species. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given they are clearly chronospecies, it's really a semantic distinction. It would be a mess to change the title and I think the evolution section gives enough context. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need to change the title, if "Sardinian dhole" refers to the genus as a whole. Just change the lede to be about the genus, and then discus the species in the body. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]