Talk:Sherman Antitrust Act

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 2, 2013 and July 2, 2022.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

inactive

.National ArchivesWikipedia:WikiProject National ArchivesTemplate:WikiProject National ArchivesNational Archives articles

United States: Government Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed Merger with "federal preemption" page

Unfortunately, the

other page is hard to read and may be viewed as being of low quality. Some cleanup would be required, but that page should probably be a section of this page. 2602:306:311F:13B0:20E2:AAA5:A8EF:1D0 (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

'Support' Agree per nom. JLo-Watson (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, other page definitely looks like a needlessly separated section of this article. Biglulu (talk) 07:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 July 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Vaulter 18:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CONCISE. The shorter version also appears to be substantially more common in reliable sources. This would revert an undiscussed 2018 move. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Support. Target redirects here. SWinxy (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Station1 (talk) 18:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support move per nom. The "of 1890" is unnecessary. O.N.R. ^(talk) 00:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Clayton Antitrust Act

Hi, I just added a source for this small section. Specifically, I cited The Oxford Encyclopedia of American Business, Labor, and Economic History. I also added an in-line citation and a few quotation marks for phrases that appeared in the source I found and that would be harder or more confusing to re-phrase using my own words.--NoFace23 (talk) 07:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]