Talk:Stanley A. McChrystal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stanley A. McChrystal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Stanley A. McChrystal. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Stanley A. McChrystal at the Reference desk. This talk page is not for discussing Stanley A. McChrystal, his politics, his opinions, his commands, or anything else not directly related to the improvement of the Stanley A. McChrystal article here on Wikipedia.

A fact from Stanley A. McChrystal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,322 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Lieutenant General Stanley A. McChrystal commanded the Joint Special Operations Command forces responsible for the death of Al-Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/January.

A news item involving Stanley A. McChrystal was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 23 June 2010.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Military This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). Military history: Biography / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force North American military history task force United States military history task force United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I would love to hear some criticisms from reliable sources. I'm sure there is. Whenever I have time I will try and try and do searches for like "criticisms against General McChrystal".Untermenschen (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2011

Nothing on the McChrystal Group? Needs to be added. http://mcchrystalgroup.com/ 167.191.240.1 (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208013220/http://www.jcs.mil:80/bios/bio_mcchrystal.html to http://www.jcs.mil/bios/bio_mcchrystal.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Its ridiculous that there are no quotes from the Rolling Stones article. Article reads like military propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.222.148.189 (talk) 11:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reflecting where and how to mention it in the article. Does someone have ideas / proposals ? --Neun-x (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

what a disgrace and embarrassment this article is. It begins with a cherry picked hyperbole statement about him being the greatest warrior and leader, His controversies are skirted and distorted, and it reads like a public relations person submitted this or the general himself is editing this page. It fails on all levels of being objective, factual, and any semblance to encyclopedic integrity. Articles like these give Wiki its dubious reputation as not a source for information but nothing but edit wars, partisan bias, lies, and misinformation. Someone needs to rewrite the entire article. I would even consider deleting the article pending on a rewrite that is based on facts on objectivity rather than exaggeration, distortion, and bias. Shhsbavavaa (talk) 07:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]