Talk:Stanley Donen

Stanley Donen has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones Date Process Result December 28, 2011 Peer review Reviewed February 13, 2012 Featured article candidate Not promoted January 6, 2013 Peer review Reviewed March 7, 2013 Good article nominee Listed December 14, 2013 Peer review Reviewed A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 23, 2019. Current status: Good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as High-importance). Dance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles WikiProject Dance To-do list: To nominate at WP:FAC : To improve to Featured standard: To nominate as a Good article: To expand: Set dance - Physically integrated dance To cleanup: Dandiya - Lead and follow To unbias: To check for copyvios: To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine To create: German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I think this article needs: A good portrait of Donen, a still from On the Town from the opening scene (possibly the RCA building or central park), and better stills for Funny Face, 7 Brides and maybe Charade.--206.188.55.235 (talk) 02:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have assessed this article as a C-class article, because it contains a lot of content. However, I have some concerns. Substantially all of the information appears to have come from one source. This often presents copyright issues. Also, note that the article is rather sloppy and needs extensive proofreading to eliminate the numerous typos, stray punctuation, etc. Indeed, it is a bit suspicious that the content is so sloppy yet basically well-written, which makes me think that it may be close paraphrasing from the source. Please see

With all due respect, that made me laugh out loud and remember my grade school teachers bafflement at my good grades and horrendous spelling. It is not plagarized from the source, I have taken the basic information and some of the ideas and put them in my own words. I'm sure that anyone who got a copy of the book I am using would see that. I also have terrible penmanship, and mustard stains on my current shirt.--206.188.55.235 (talk) 02:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC) I'm done with this page now, but your appreciation for the hours I spent on it is duely noted.--206.188.55.235 (talk) 02:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Stanley Donen/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 13:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review--Singin in the Rain is one of my two or three all-time favorites. In the next few days, I'll do a close readthrough, noting here any issues I can't immediately fix myself, and then follow with the criteria checklist. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial readthrough

Sorry that this took me longer to begin than planned. At first pass, this looks like another strong film article, and does a particularly good job of explaining Donen's long-term significance in the evolution of film. Thanks buckets for your work on this important figure.

Thanks so much for doing this.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some copyedits throughout, so please doublecheck me and revert anything you disagree with. Other than those, here's the points I see that might be addressed:

• "the last surviving notable film director of Hollywood's Golden Age" -- this needs citation as a bit of a value judgement

• Yea, there is no source. It belongs in the article because it is true, but it may have to go.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "Never gratuitous or amateurish, this scene also establishes character development and sets up the plot of the film while creating a fun, fast paced, kinetic energy that influenced all musicals that came after it" -- this evaluation should be attributed to a critic in-text ("According to John Wakeman,")

• That's a tough one because Wakeman is the editor of the entire book while authors of individual articles are rarely attributed to an author. Is there a way to do that?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, sorry. I didn't mean it had to be Wakeman specifically. Do you still have this book on hand to say which article this is coming from? I think a phrase like "Film critic X describes the scene as never gratuitous or amateurish, while also establishing..." would be helpful here. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "that he had been a member of the Communist party" -- is it possible to provide a more specific link here? (e.g., Communist Party USA?)

•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "The most famous sequence is the Give a Girl a Break dance between Reynolds and Fosse" -- is the title here meant to refer to an individual number? If so, as a song, it should be in quotation marks here rather than italics.

•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "film critic Jean-Luc Godard"-- would it be better to call him "director" here? He's rather more famous for that, but I see the point that he's in his role as a critic here.

•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "Their achievements reached a level of perfection on Singin' in the Rain" -- this judgement should be clearly sourced; we shouldn't say in Wikipedia's voice that this is a perfect film (though I personally agree that it is!).

•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "while most film directors are said to prefer Minnelli's work." -- this general statement probably needs a citation. (Who says this, specifically?)

• Its a continuation of Silverman's opinions and is included in the next quote. Do you think this citation should be repeated?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, I think it's worth adding the citation also to the end of that sentence for clarity, only because the sentence already has one citation in it. I'll go ahead and do this, but revert me if you strongly disagree. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "However it is also true " -- This appears to be a bit of
  WP:SYNTH
  --using one source to rebut another without either author having directly connected these. I suggest that this sentence be cut.

•  Done--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• " It starred Zak Edwards as Donen, Charles Osburne as Kelly and Summer Broyhill as Coyne." -- the opening cast for this musical may be a little more information than is needed here, especially considering that these aren't big names. Up to you, though.

•  Done, you're probably right.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• "His first wife was dancer, choreographer and actress Jeanne Coyne" -- is the correct spelling Jean or Jeanne? This should be made consistent. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done, aside from the quotes.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 22:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Thanks for your fast responses. All the above looks good; I've noted the few remaining issues below.

• Just a heads up that I won't have Internet access for the next 3-7 days. I apologize for the delay this will cause in the review. -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks so much for doing this. I'm fixing the web links right now and I will either get a source or rephrase the gratuitous quote. I'm also going to go over the prose at lest once and make some changes as needed. The article got a Copy Edit a little while ago and to be honest I didn't love all of the choices that the editor made in terms of re-structuring the article, so I may change certain parts back. --Deoliveirafan (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Sounds good! Let me know when you're happy with it. There's no rush--I know you're doing that Greed FAC right now, too, so feel free to make that the priority. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the list incorporation .
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline .	I think the article meets the minimum for this criterion, but I wanted to point out the problem that many of the website links have incorrect titles--for example, "Boston.com article on Donen" instead of the article's actual title. This would make these articles almost impossible to find if the url should move. It's not needed for me to pass this for GA, but I'd strongly suggest that the titles of these articles, and their date of publication, be added to the citations.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.	The "last living Golden Age director" needs citation or to be cut.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Comprehensive without ever being over-detailed.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	As an opinion, the "never gratuitous" quotation needs in-text attribution for POV reasons.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as audio :
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions .
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass

I've removed a reference to Donen getting a "Golden Raspuberry" spoof award for one of his films. My edit summary said that there was a longstanding consensus that such awards don't appear in biographical articles, but that was based on a discussion in Wikiproject Films that hasn't quite ended. Now I'm not so sure that there has been such a consensus. However, I don't believe that it belongs in this article unless this parody award is mentioned in a secondary source. Otherwise it becomes unsourced negatve material, and not really suitable for a living person. Coretheapple (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Stanley Donen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120103224342/http://www.nypress.com/article-16861-bosom-buddies.html to http://www.nypress.com/article-16861-bosom-buddies.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120922022548/http://www.brtstage.org/productions/what-glorious-feeling to http://brtstage.org/productions/what-glorious-feeling
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426080639/http://www.wichitafilms.com/en/documentary-01.php to http://www.wichitafilms.com/en/documentary-01.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For those doing such great work on cleaning up this page over the past few days, the

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Stanley Donen's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "allmovie":

• From
  Rovi via The New York Times. Archived from the original
  on July 14, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2012. Birthplace: Princeton, New Jersey, USA ... Born in Princeton Junction, NJ, in 1968...
• From
  Filmography and awards of Stanley Donen: "Stanley Donen filmography". AllMovie
  . Retrieved May 5, 2017.
• From George Kennedy: Erickson, Hal. "George Kennedy". AllMovie. Retrieved February 29, 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I find this particular section, while important to the article, doesn't seem to really focus enough on the article's subject - Donen. I'm going to hold off on live edit of this section and noodle it a bit more, but will circle back on it. It's just confusing to tell what Donan did and it's importance based on the way this part is written. I think a BLP should focus on the subject primarily, and this section focuses on the film itself, rather than Donen's role in it. I added the template to connect the main article of the film. Tennis Anyone?^Talk 15:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]