Talk:Stephanie Flanders

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group. University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. BBC Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance Women in Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Flanderss (talk · contribs) / Stephanie Flanders This user has contributed to the article.

Now I'm torn. I created this, thinking I'd find more to put in, and here I am wondering if I should merge it in with

Seems to me to be fairly notable, and given the link-density between famous family members, worth having as a separate article. Michael's certainly not an obvious or especially natural merge target to my mind. It might be destined to remain stubby for a while, admittedly. Alai 22:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just my opinion, but I think this article stands up pretty well on its own - no need to merge. Bretonbanquet 23:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is Stephanie Flanders - now I've read the guidance on autobiographies I wanted to mention that I have corrected some of the earlier inaccuracies in the article, for example the suggestion that I joined the BBC initially as a presenter on Panorama. I have also added the novelist Alec Waugh as a relative, simply because he never gets any attention relative to Evelyn (congratulations whoever made that connection - very obscure). And I added the fact that I asked Cameron whether his party would like me to be married, because it is this that has caused all the controversy. I haven't changed the more controversial stuff. I hope this is OK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flanderss (talk • contribs) 16:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephanie - a good piece on Newsnight tonight - I rarely watch so hadn't seen you on before, so I decided to look you up :-) The lack of information on exposure to ABCP has been bloody frustrating, but today I found the best assessment of risk I'd seen from Fisk, which I linked to on this post on Motley Fool - dunno if it's of any use. I've removed some vandalism from your entry and removed what I felt were some subjective descriptions. The number of Wikipedia rules and guidelines are mushrooming, but if you simply follow the

WP:Five Pillars and WP:Autobiography you'll be better than the majority of editors and you'll pick everything else up just by looking at the source code as you edit to see how other people have coded various effects. Cheers John 22:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

She did a BBC Radio 4 program on the Mr Men children books series in the Feb, 2010. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00qm467

The article would benefit from a better photograph. Snowman (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is still needed.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She is wonderful, of course. I don't get her liking for big collars, though. Jagdfeld (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The same people are described as uncles and half uncles. I want consistency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.84.186 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]