Talk:Sus (genus)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sus (genus) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edit Semi-Protected Request - 2020 MAR 10 - Revert Vandalism
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Revert vandalism in first line. Stelith (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing it out, I've fixed it. However, this article is not protected - please feel free to fix such things yourself next time. - MrOllie (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)]
- Weird, it shows it as semi-protected for me and won't let me at it. Odd. Stelith (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2021
This edit request to Pig has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The final paragraph of "Diet and foraging" which states that "Although pigs are not true carnivores, they are deadly and efficient predators. They are documented man-eaters" should be sourced or removed. Delekof (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Removed - if someone want to re-word the bit with a ref that would be fine. If such is documented, lets have a reference. From my experience with swine on the farm way back when - I don't doubt that it is true. Vsmith (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
I don't get this ?
<<The genus Sus is currently thought to contain eight living species>>
But there is 9 species in the list given in the article, which is ok. Is that intended ? Gimly24 (talk) 11:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Good catch! There had been a list of 8, with a 9th as a subentry of one of them, until this edit made the 9th part of the main list in its own right but did not adjust the intro sentence. Pinging User:Geekgecko, but in the mean time I'll change it. DMacks (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change sus amongus to sus as this is incorrect and and obvious joke it is located at the top of the page in the first mention of the genus that isn't the title 2A00:23C7:848E:6E01:B8B6:224F:16B8:DE2E (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the heads up. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)