Talk:TI Media

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper

Other :

Answer requests for comments

Untitled

The early data about the history of the International Publishing Corporation (not 'Company') is almost totally wrong. I speak from personal experience, having worked on the IPC headquarters staff from 1965-70, and been Director of Manpower Development from 1968-70.

Graham Cleverley

I've now corrected and expanded the early history, up to 1970. As far as I know the facts after 1970 are substantially correct.

The text I added here is not original research, but personal experience. However, of course the newspapers of the day can be checked, and the subject is covered inter alia in my book The Fleet Street Disaster (Constable 1976) and touched on briefly in Managers and Magic (Longmans, 1971).

If anyone is listening I would like to know how errors of fact like those in the current article (for instance at the most basic there was never an 'International Publishing Company', since it was always the 'International Publishing Corporation) ever get corrected?

78.141.169.113 (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Judging by the comment above it looks like the text below is original research, and I've removed it to here to work out how best to take it forward.

IPC Media is a large

Fleetway Publications

.

The corporation at this time controlled two national dailies and two national Sunday newspapers, nearly a hundred consumer magazines and over 200 trade and technical titles, as well as considerable book publishing operations, controlled in a ramshackle manner since the various companies had all been acquired by the Mirror group with no significant change being made to their management other than the appointment of Mirror Group directors as chairmen.

Sorting out the consequent managerial problems became the job of the Mirror Group managing director Frank Rogers, who in 1965 set up a management development department to rationalise the situation. In 1968 this led to the reorganisation of the group into six divisions:

IPC Newspapers (including the People and the Daily Herald from Odhams as well as the Mirror and Pictorial.
IPC Magazines, controlling the consumer magazines.
IPC Trade and Technical, controlling the specialist magazines.
IPC Books, for all book publishing, headed by Paul Hamlyn, whose own company had been acquired by IPC
IPC Printing, controlling all non-newspaper printing operations, headed by Arnold Quick, whose own company had been also acquired by IPC.
IPC New Products, intended as a launch pad for enterprises using new technology, headed by Alistair McIntosh, who had joined IPC to set up the original management development department. McIntosh however was not a member of the main board.

IPC also had significant holdings in television and paper production, and at this point was the world's largest publishing and printing operation.^{[citation needed]}

Apart from Hamlyn, Quick and McIntosh, all the divisions were headed by chairmen originally from the Mirror Group.

In the same year, a boardroom coup ousted the chairman, Cecil King, whose place was taken by the deputy chairman, Hugh Cudlipp. Frank Rogers remained as managing director.

Cudlipp, a magnificent newspaper editor with no taste for management, was uneasy with this situation or with the movement that was beginning to take IPC into new directions with computerised publications and other new technology, at the end of 1969 invited

Don Ryder, an ex-Mirror Group advertising director who was chairman of the Reed Paper Group

in which IPC had nearly a 30% stake, to mount a reverse take-over for the corporation.

Despite a last-ditch effort by some of the management team to prevent it, the take-over went through, and IPC became part of the Reed Paper group. Notably Arnold Quick, Paul Hamlyn, and Frank Rogers all left the corporation, as did those involved with the attempt to stop the takeover, including Graham Cleverley, the chief organiser, director of manpower development, who had been responsible for the design of the 1968 reorganisation.

The corporation then in essence went into decline, losing its position as the world's largest publisher/printer.

In

Time Warner, in 2001

.

End removed text. Hiding Talk 12:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closure of "Nuts"

I intend to remove the section on the closure of Nuts magazine. IPC has opened and closed a great many magazines, of which Nuts is hardly significant compared to, for example, Melody Maker (which started in the 1930s). If Nuts is to be afforded the dignity of an entry, try creating a separate page for it. And see if anyone cares. --gilgongo (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Time Inc.UK

Dear Fellow Wikipedians,

You guys and girls might have notice me update some of Time Inc. UK's magazines pages changing it from IPC to Time Inc./Time Inc. UK.It a lot, any help will be welcome.

Thanks,

BBM@Blood.

BBMatBlood (talk) 08:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

Time Inc. UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ

for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TI Media template

Greeting.

I just created a template for TI Media portfolios, with notable omission of InStyle UK (kept by Meridian Corporation)

Cheers.

Dawn 11:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Defunct?

Three weeks ago, Chat started using a Future logo on the cover and with the indicia, rather than having a TI Media logo with the indicia. If all the other mags have done the same or are about to with their next issue, it would mean that the TI Media brand is defunct. Digifiend (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]