Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 8, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 14 December 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Films / Computer Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). Animated United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Comics: Films This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

A fact from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the stylized animation of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem was inspired by rough sketches in school notebooks? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem.

The films title has yet to be formally revealed. The most we have is the title Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Next Chapter that has been mentioned by a ton of reliable sources. That logo which was used by Paramount + was used to encompass the whole franchise (it has not been clarified whether the villain spin-offs are a part of this films universe). I think it's for the best if we just rename the page to The untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film for now. Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 08:14, 02 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been off most of the day due to two very frustrating simultaneous discussions elsewhere. Of course I’ve been confused as to why Funkydude is removing such a huge chunk. Maybe I was too naive to think a revert from a second person would deter them from reverting again. I wasn’t expecting to see it still waged. Then I was tagged here. CreecregofLife (talk) 21:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been adding a lot of the sourced stuff on the page, but Funkydude refuses to accepts them and the changes that were added. NoobMiester96 (talk) 02:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried discussing with you on here and on your talk page. I ask for reputable sources but you fail to bring one everytime, or even simply respond. I don't know where you get stuff like Paramount Animation or Nickelodeon Movies being production companies on the film (the latter hasn't even been hinted in any articles for this film). But I guess I shouldn't even be surprised, since one glance at your talk page shows you have a history of adding unsourced information to other pages. Disappointed that this situation didn't get looked into deeper. Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 10:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been protected, and I have blocked Dude for 24 hours for a clear 3RR violation. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. NoobMiester96 (talk) 18:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's been an edit war over the past few days over whether this is solely an American film, or an American, Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian and Turkish coproduction. IMDb, for the record, says it's the latter and not the former — and while it's true that IMDb can be incorrect sometimes, you must show

The film definitely isn't any of those latter things. That was just added by an anonymous vandal. For all we know the movie is either American or Canadian-American since the only two production companies involved with it are

Nickelodeon Animation (with Paramount Pictures distributing) according to all these sources.^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]} There is no mention of any Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian and Turkish production companies. Averyfunkydude23 (talk

) 7:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

There has been debate on whether it's just American or Canadian-american. Since Point Grey Pictures is owned by Canadians, but it is actually located in the Los Angeles California. I think it's the former Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd address the elephant in the room, or turtle for that matter: Is there even a source that Paramount Animation is co-producing the film? I mean Nickelodeon Movies has released two computer-animated films (PAW Patrol: The Movie and Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank) that weren't produced by Paramount Animation. Just curious. XSMan2016 (talk) 15:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've found these mentions of Paramount Animation and

Nickelodeon Animation Studios here: "We are beyond thrilled by this world-class cast we’ve assembled to bring these iconic, beloved characters to life in a new chapter of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles universe. This really sets a new bar for this globally celebrated franchise, and we can’t wait to show audiences this film,” said Nickelodeon Animation and Paramount Animation Ramsey Naito in a statement I would leave them out until there is confirmation from a trailer, poster or reliable source. After all, if it's not in reliable third party sources, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. No matter how true it may be. Mike Allen 15:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

There is the edit warriors with Foothand and Zingo156, who keeps reverting everytime. LancedSoul (talk) 19:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, my lead fits the leads of every other superhero film page from the MCU and DCEU films. Zingo156, however, keeps reverting, citing that it makes the page "worse", despite, again, being the standard in superhero film pages. If it makes the page worse, then it wouldn't be used anywhere. Foothand (talk) 20:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And it's not used in any other TMNT pages. It's not part of the MCU or DCU, so we don't need consistency with those.

More importantly, your edits keep removing significant coverage of the voice cast. It's careless to keep reverting. oknazevad (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that your edits are similar to Lemaroto makes it looks like you are abusing multiple accounts. I was referring to Foothand, BTW. LancedSoul (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If that's a problem, just change the other pages so all TMNT pages have this lead. This lead not only appear in pages of the MCU or DCEU, but previous films that are not part of those universes, like Spider-Man (2002). And I'm not removing anything of the cast, just changing that lead. Foothand (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But they are not DCU or MCU films, and there is no need to be consistent with those. The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are not associated with any particular publisher, so you can't open the article up with "based on the DC/Marvel Comic character." '' Based on the superhero team the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles'' doesn't say anything about who created or owns them or where they originated (in this case, comic books). Besides, the Wikipedia pages for

The Dark Knight trilogy, The Lego Batman Movie, and Big Hero 6, all open up in a similar fashion, so it is not mandatory. Zingo156 (talk) 12:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Link: https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0057/3728/3618/files/scan002_b2a5c1bd-c077-4b46-aa7b-089b2ad6c006.jpg 179.228.223.101 (talk) 02:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's a poor quality and low resolution. LancedSoul (talk) 02:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly think we should put the billing version. It's going to be shrunk anyway so the block will inevitably be unreadable, and it actually has more image as seen here. IAmNMFlores (talk) 02:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion about posters with billing blocks here. Yes, a poster with a billing block is generally preferred over one without. But a big reason as to why is because they act as an additional way to verify information to put in an infobox, like the order of casting. If there is no high-quality version with a readable billing block, it is not needed. Especially if the quality is as low as the image you keep proposing. You keep arguing that there is more image, but also that the color is much worse compared to the current file. Doesn't help that unlike IMP Awards that source, Movie Posters, isn't as reliable. Zingo156 (talk) 06:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well with that discussion, the billing block was not availible on the website like this one has AND was used to mainly determine the cast ordering, which this billing block doesn't have; so we have a readable block easy to access so it doesn't matter if this one is readable. Altered coloring is something common I've seen with billing block posters, mainly from Universal Pictures ones tho. I know Movie Posters isn't AS reliable as IMP, but it's not unreliable. Scroll through the site and you'll see they only deal in official posters. IAmNMFlores (talk) 14:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it isn't really ''altered colouring, but more that the poster you are suggesting is of poor quality. Universal Pictures has an image press site, which is where the posters with billing blocks for The Super Mario Bros. Movie and Oppenheimer have been found. Both those posters are in good quality, just as are the versions without billing blocks on IMP Awards. Also, Movie Poster pages are more likely to be deleted. It happened with Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, which is why I replaced the poster with the one on the IMP Awards. There isn't any good reason to put the poster you are suggesting, and having a poster with a billing block is preferred, but not mandatory. Zingo156 (talk) 17:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Universal ones with billing blocks AND release dates usually have a bit of alteration, like with Jurassic World: Dominion and Oblivion. Only reasons these 2 are not used on the Wiki is because 1. People didn't care for the alteration and preferred a standard one even if it meant not having a release date for Dominion, and 2. I didn't change the Oblivion one because it had less image than the non-alteted one. Since you brought up Movie Posters can delete their posters, I will allow the non-block one to remain. If I somehow find another source with a block, I will return. IAmNMFlores (talk) 18:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again not ''alteration'', just loss of quality in the color specifically. Same with the poster you uploaded to The Last Voyage of the Demeter. The images taken directly from that Universal press site don't have that issue. Just the ones from random sites, particularly Movie Posters. Zingo156 (talk) 05:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can this link be added for details of a voice acting related cameo of MrBeast? [1] 141.239.235.96 (talk) 17:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zingo156, sorry for the long-ass wait! As requested I'm going to give a few of my thoughts into this. I believe it is overall ready to get the green circle, it just needs some tweaks, from which a GA reviewer will season the article. I'll continue with the rest later. GeraldWL 05:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LEAD:

• What is the general consensus on referring to the turtles? I see some mentions of Turtles but also ones that aren't capitalized. Then there's also turtle brothers in the plot.
• Nickelodeonm, or Nickelodeon Movies? Or Animation Studio? Lead, infobox, and development sec.s contradict each other
• Considering you have a Themes section (which is always nice to read!), you might wanna include a summary on that in the lead, after the movie's logline.
• Since you already cite its BO gross in the reception, you don't need that citation in the lead anymore. The budget can be put in the BO section too, in layouts like "The film grossed .... against a budget of ... for a worldwide total of ..."

PLOT:

• Link mutagen, unlink housefly and whale, italicize ninjutsu
• NYC is a COMMONNAME and thus excessive linking.
• All the characters are referred to by their first names, which is the standard, but why "Stockman"?
• "adoptive rat father, Splinter after"-- redundant comma
• "past an embarrassing viral incident of vomiting on camera"-- it should be clear that April finds this embarassing, it is not objectively embarassing
• "Utrom painfully "milks" the turtles for their mutagen"-- again, whether or not its painful, it's subjective to the turtles; I think this can be omitted. Could change this to "Utrom extracts the turtles' mutagen"
• The overall plot is engaging, and it stays at the safe zone of 500ish words, although I feel like if you could merge them into 4-5 paragraphs that would make it easier to navigate. Also for the mid-credits scene, if it's possible try and merge it into the plot without having to mention it being mid credits.

CAST:

• Remove the full stops in the cast bullet lists as they're not full sentences
• The descriptions of the turtles are not so neutral. "geek", "tech guru", "goofball", "most mature", "sarcastic", "brash". Plus I don't think it is essential in this article, considering the other characters' attitudes are not described too, rightfully so.
• You can just add a sentence above the bullets "Credits adapted from multiple references:[5][6][7]" instead of having to duplicate-cite it all
• "Scumbug is a mutant cockroach and member of Superfly's gang. The character uses a blend of different voices, but is credited to Alex Hirsch." --> "Scumbug, a mutant cockroach and member of Superfly's gang, uses a blend of different voices, but is credited to Alex Hirsch."

PRODUCTION:

• "from a screenplay from Brendan O'Brien" --> "from a screenplay by Brendan O'Brien"
• Link Twitter, Billing (performing arts)
• If
  Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Next Chapter
  redirects here, it'd be a good idea to bold it too

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 05:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be preforming this review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate failure

1. Its pretty close to all of the criteria
2. Earwig flags various issues which I will take a look at the highest being a 93.5% overlap. I'll take a further look though

Okay of the seven sources with over 40% overlap 5 of the 6 are quotes. Another thing is the title gets flagged as plagerism which I think is kind of funny. The highest one seems to be lifting from Wikipedia. Crisis averted the reveiw may continue!

3. No maintenance tags.
4. Page is currently stable, no persistent vandalism.
5. No previous nominations ✓ Pass

Good Article

Well-written

Any particular reason why Jimmy Donaldson/MrBeast is listed as MrBeast and not Jimmy Donaldson? I understand that the articles name is MrBeast as it is the

common name

is that the reason here?

The voice cast section is based on the end credits crawl. He is referred to as MrBeast in the end credits. Post Malone, for example, is referred to as Austin Post in the credits despite his pseudonym being better known, and the name of his article.

At the end of "Themes" before the quote a period is used instead of a comma when it should be the other way around

Fixed it!

 Done ✓ Pass

Verifiable

I have randomly selected sources 8, 75 and 102 for a spot check. (based on this revision [2])

Spotchecks

REF 8

Claim:

Kyler Spears joined the film as co-director, signing on because he had worked with Rowe on his prior film, The Mitchells vs. the Machines (2021).

Source:

Cinesite Tapped for ‘Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem’, Title Revealed

Proven by source: No the source does confirm Rowe worked on Mitchel vs. the Machines and that Spears worked on Mutant Mayhem. It was paried with a second source ([3]) which does confirm that the link between the two was the Mitchels v. the Machines

REF 75

Claim:

Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale, while those polled at PostTrak gave it an 88% overall positive score, with 70% saying they would definitely recommend the film.

Source:

[4]

Proven by source:

There is a section dedicated to the film where the information is confirmed.

REF 102

Claim: The film was nominated for a still pending (as of 7 January 2024 winners have not yet been announced so it is listed as pending) for a critics choice award.
Source:

[5]

Proven by source:

Under the subheader "best animated feature" it is listed.

Backed up by other sources: [6] Which is an offical website states the fact as well.

What is the reliablity of Nerd Reactor? From what I looked at their website doesnt have an about page and I havent found anything atesting to their reliability. So is it good? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to find this discussion from 2020 and this one from 2021. I think in the context I used it, it is fine? But maybe it will be safer looking for a substitute. Zingo156 (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass

Broad in coverage

The plot section is 579 words, 121 under/over the 700 word limit.

Article stays on topic with links where applicable.

✓ Pass

Neutral

Nothing overly praises it nor criticizes it. Good mix of postive and negative reviews in "Critical Reception"

✓ Pass

Stable

The last reverted edit was on the 25 of December 2023. Its been pretty stable since then it also has a Protection Template. No major debates in the past three months. ✓ Pass

Illustrated

The article has five images two of which are free use. The three from commons are of the producers and the director which I understand.

1. Movie poster (free use): Understandble to show
2. Concept art (free use): I understand the use of this under desing to held explain the characters better.

✓ Pass