Talk:Temple of Zeus, Olympia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This gets really boring after a while —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.66.80.4 (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

is it just me or does the first link of the notes/references doesn't load? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.218.126 (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the all-BC style after some to and fro edits today. The style has been mixed for nearly all the article's long history. The very first edit, in Feb 2007, used BC, but remarkably the same editor added some BCE a few hours later, & the article has remained mixed ever since until recently, as far as I can see. Note that the last reversion, by User:El C, put some dates to BCE but left others BC. If anyone thinks it should be BCE, please say so. Johnbod (talk) 01:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]