Talk:The Secret Life of Pets 2

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Animated United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

What could be harrison ford take a voice of any character??

Talk pages are meant to discuss possible improvements to the article, they are not a comment section. If you want to share your opinion of box office predictions for this film, social media or personal blogs are better suited for that, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. -Gouleg (Talk • Contribs) 17:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is there any reason why I didn't see the final poster of this movie today? I am so worried.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Secret Life of Pets 2 (upcoming film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you guys heard about a possible third Secret Life of Pets movie? look up on cinemablend and see. -Dinonick90 (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

WP:CRYSTAL and try to avoid speculation. Actors are unlikely to say bad things before a film has been released. Actors are often tied into multi-film contracts and are still unlikely to say bad things even after a film bombs. This should probably not have been added to the article. This film looked like it did well so a sequel or spin-off does seem likely but until they announce that they have gone into production I don't think it is appropriate to add anything. Again please try to avoid speculation, this is still supposed to be an encyclopedia. -- 109.78.244.23 (talk) 04:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I've removed the "Sequel" section, and I probably shouldn't have even tried to rewrite the misguided speculation in the first place. It was only comments from actors right in the middle of promoting the film saying they'd prefer not to be unemployed. There is no film in development.

Any section labelled "Possible sequel" should really be removed on sight, because

Remove again.[1] This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, of course actors are going to say they would like to work on the film again when they are right in the middle of promoting it. If the writers or the director or the producers had something to say about a sequel that might be worth including but these comments from the actors are not meaningful or significant. -- 109.76.195.183 (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But it could be! But gonna shows you while I edited it.~~ MLJ 657 (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, and an encyclopedia is supposed to be about what is not what "could be". Please try to read some of the guidelines

WP:NOTSPECULATION, with a better understanding of the rules and guidelines it might become clearer to you. -- 109.78.194.120 (talk) 16:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hu the tiger don't speak anything, just only roars and growls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.222.83.87 (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what do you mean by this; but looking at your contributions, Talk pages are places meant to discuss article improvement, they're not a forum to discuss the subject. -Gouleg🛋️ (Talk • Contribs) 17:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only production company listed is American. Japan and France were added with a national database source but that conflicts with their being no Japanese or French production companies involved with the production. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue appears to be that the Lumiere site attributes "producing countries" to all those who provided financing.

Adopting a pragmatic approach, the Observatory considers as the country of origin of a specific film the country out of which the film is financed. In the case of international co-productions, the film is assigned to the country which provides the majority share of production financing. The Observatory tries to list all co-producing countries in the order of their financial investment in the film (whether known or assumed), with the country having provided the majority financial investment in the production in first place. [2] Barry Wom (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So basically a country is listed in the database record if some entity in that country helped finance the film. It has nothing to do with which company actually produced, as in created, the film. We should stick with nationality of the credited production company or companies, companies that are in the actual business of making films. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]