Talk:Turrbal language

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Turrbal language is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move 22 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It was proposed in this section that Turrbal language be renamed and moved to Yuggera and Turrbal languages.

result:

ed. ^{put'er there} 12:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Move logs: source title · target title

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

No such user (talk) 12:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment: If it is not clear whether they are distinct languages or not, then why is a title being proposed that says they are different (or at least multiple) languages? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly because I can't think of a better title and secondly there is a difference between the technical use of the term 'language' in linguistics versus common use both broadly and specifically by the Indigenous groups that use the language. Safes007 (talk) 06:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Language–dialect distinctions are frequently blurry, and while I can appreciate the effort to try to create a compromise solution here, I think the proposal is a bit too clunky to really be desirable. I think a better solution would be to retain one name as the article title, and have the other title either redirect here or host a separate article about that language. (The uncertainty over whether the two languages are separate can then be discussed in the body of the article/articles.) In particular, I worry that a title ending in "...languages" might mislead readers into thinking that they're reading an article on a language family rather than just two languages. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:27, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Out of this particular discussion's scope (because it would need a multi-move RM): so just out of curiosity, what do you think of Turrbal language → Turrbal and Turrbal → Turrbal people? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If we kept the current name here, I would suggest Turrbal langauge and Turrbal people, similar to French language and French people Safes007 (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would another solution be to name the article 'Yagera language family' or similar? Then all the languages could be listed under separate headings with a description of the different classifications. I'd use yagera for the title as it appears to be the name of the family in the most recent academic source I could find in Dixon (2002). Safes007 (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't that be a distinct subject that could potentially merit its own distinct article? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.