Talk:William Z. Ripley
William Z. Ripley was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 28, 2007, compares against the
six good article criteria
:
- 1. Well written?: Pass
- 2. Factually accurate?: Fail Many statements are missing sources, 2 out of the 3 web page references cannot be found.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Fail Image should have a correct fair use rationale on them (I suggest Template:Fair use rationale) and it should be more detailed.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
GA review
. Thank you for your work so far.
— Man 11:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
]
File:NYT 1926 - Ripley speaks.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:NYT 1926 - Ripley speaks.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 11:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC) ]
|
I strongly disagree that it should pass the fourth crieria of "Neutral point of view". This article clearly has been written to support and legitimize the racist theories of William Riply. Verde10 (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)verde10