Talk:Women artists

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Women's History Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Women artists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles ArtAndFeminism This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2015.ArtAndFeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArtAndFeminism articles

Depiction of women artists in art history was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 August 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Women artists. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: . Latest Art. Autumn 2006 http://latest-art.co.uk/pdfs/2/003_LA002.pdf. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 4 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mysterious Ties (article contribs).

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 19 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cavan.geyer.

Above undated message substituted from

Fellow Wikipedians, there are 14 self-portrait illustrations in this article. It gives a rather skewed vision of mainly European women, in front of two mirrors, painting themselves. Any chance of reducing this proportion by substituting for other topics by the same authors?--Po Mieczu (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be going a little mad here! Btw, there's no way that Bridget Riley has a valid copyright tag. Johnbod (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The self-portraits get the point across succinctly, subtly, and they should stay...Modernist (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While looking at the contemporary artists section, I found this sentence:

1995 saw Dame Elizabeth Blackadder in the 300-year history made 'Her Majesty's painter and limber in Scotland, she was awarded the OBE in 1982.

This seems somewhat ungrammatical. I am unfortunately quite unclear as to what this is supposed to mean and as such can't really fix it, but it seems worth noting. 86.163.220.149 (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some sections have more sources than other, which leads me to question where they got the information from in order to avoid bias. --Midnightbrightstars (talk) 07:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]