Talk:Wood bison

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mammals Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: British Columbia / Saskatchewan / Alberta / Northwest Territories Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan. This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alaska Low‑importance Russia: Physical geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ThatsCrazey. Peer reviewers: Lithopslover.

Above undated message substituted from

From the little bit of research that I've done, there doesn't seem to be a consensus, yet, on whether the Wood Bison is a subspecies or ecotype of the North American Bison. So I added some references that discuss the controversy. But it would be nice if someone created a section for discussing the controversy and enumerating the arguments for both sides of the debate. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indented line

I think there is a consensus on wood bison and plains bison being separate subspecies. In my recent comprehensive lit review and correspondence with CWS, NWT and AB biologists I didn't encounter any controversy, and ended up not having any reason to bring up the ecotype idea at all. Evidence of distinction in genetics, range, autecology and morphology is pretty good, and the ecotype idea papers you cited are based on a couple papers both published over 20 years ago. I'd like to update and flesh out this article in stages when timing is appropriate... I think it's important to get all the facts out into the public domain. Bison are as much part of the natural heritage of Canada as the beaver is. Librarywild (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

^{[clarification needed]} The purpose of the outherd was to establish a "safety stock", not related to other species.

چیمن حیدری بهنودسیاه بخت (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I realize this is a contested subject, however I believe the presence of the shaggier head, thicker (not point) beard, foreleg chaps, and more rounded hump indicate that the animal shown is a plains bison vs. wood bison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reeltraveler (talk • contribs) 15:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article clearly states this is still a threatened species, yet it is listed as non-threatened. Please correct this.

• I changed the status to VU, vulnerable, because I can't find what level of threatened the wood bison is at. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:4605:200:11C7:6E8F:4D89:F793 (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

" Conservation

The herd currently has a total population around 2,500, "

The article speaks of all Wood Bison, all herds, the subsection "Conservation" should not lead with "the herd", that makes no sense. Tallard (talk) 16:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]