User:Liz/XfD log
Appearance
< User:Liz
May 2021
- ) 02:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find evidence on IMDB that there is any film by this name or any film that stars the actors listed here in the cast that goes by a different name. The only references online I see are sites that seem to be lifting Wikipedia's article as a description. This article was PROD'd but dePROD'd as it was previously deleted by a PROD 11 years ago.
June 2021
- ) 01:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This entry reads more like Sikh theology than an encyclopedic article. I went to see if editors at WikiProject Sikhism could help with it but that project is inactive.
- ) 00:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I tagged this article CSD as a recreation of a deleted article (see the many AFDs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination) but was challenged by the page creator that it was significantly different. But given the fact that the subject has come to AFD so many times, I'd like to get a consensus decision from AFD regulars on whether the article should be deleted or if this subject now warrants an article.
- ) 02:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This seems like an unlikely search term and is inappropriate.
- ) 01:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think having a strange name is a good enough reason for a WIkipedia article. It doesn't help that the main source states that his first name is "Semyon", not "Semen" so I question the total accuracy of this article. Written by an editor (Penii) who edits articles regarding penis torture so that might be a factor in the name change. There are some copyright issues with this piece, too.
- ) 00:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm posting this RFD for C87d98b10. His rationale for this redirect deletion is: "my rationale is that the team in question was proposed (at least according to the original article) to be a development team for an amateur league a decade ago that never materialised. It basically never went any further than an idea as far as it's possible to tell. It was only redirected to the USARL article on the basis that this article had a mention of it, but I had to remove this as the source provided was a deadlink and I was unable to locate any other RS's to verify that this club even existed as an idea and isn't pure OR. I hope that helps, many thanks for your assistance.:::Same rationale for Orange County Outlaws and Houston Hornets, which have all been de-PRODed by another user. c87d98b10"
- Reason: I'm posting this RFD for C87d98b10. His rationale for this redirect deletion is: "my rationale is that the team in question was proposed (at least according to the original article) to be a development team for an amateur league a decade ago that never materialised. It basically never went any further than an idea as far as it's possible to tell. It was only redirected to the USARL article on the basis that this article had a mention of it, but I had to remove this as the source provided was a deadlink and I was unable to locate any other RS's to verify that this club even existed as an idea and isn't pure OR. I hope that helps, many thanks for your assistance.:::Same rationale for
- CfD (CfR); renaming to Category:2021 United States Capitol attack; notified Pokelova (talk · contribs) 17:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This category was moved out-of-process to this new title, an action I reverted but since the main article is now titled 2021 United States Capitol attack, I thought I'd officially propose this move to see if there is a consensus to move the category as well.
- Reason: This category was moved out-of-process to this new title, an action I reverted but since the main article is now titled
- ) 04:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While this has the potential to be a useful template, I think this 14 year old template is unknown and unused in recent years.
July 2021
- ) 16:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Pages this template relies upon have either been deleted (List of Billboard number-one alternative albums) or don't exist and are unlikely to be created. Template is unused.
- ) 02:42, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find any reference of "Joey Diggs" to Coca-Cola or anything else and this is also a double redirect.
- ) 02:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think this is a likely search term on Wikipedia.
- ) 06:06, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't believe that anyone refers to Bill Cosby as "Billy" or would search for him under this name.
- ) 06:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think a buttcrack is separated into an upper, middle and lower crack. I'm not sure human biology supports this division of anatomy or if anyone would search Wikipedia for "Upper crack".
- ) 06:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Granted I haven't checked the Urban Dictionary but I don't think any reader will search for Semen under "Man cream".
- ) 23:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Unsourced, non-notable school. This article had substantially more content that was removed because it was promotional. This change didn't leave much more than a description of the function of different buildings.
- ) 03:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: A category full of original research and speculation. It is doubtful whether all of the bishops in this category identify as gay or bisexual, especially those from centuries ago.
- ) 01:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This template was plastered on dozens of pages. It is very visible and detracts from the readability of articles.
- ) 00:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This is not just an inactive WikiProject but the creation of a sockpuppeteer who was only active for one month on Wikipedia. It did no article assessments or have any associated pages under this WikiProject. It does have 3 associated templates/userboxes which I'd also propose be deleted.
- ) 05:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This is a template for a defunct WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Rodeo/Bull riding is literally a blank page, no articles were assessed and this template serves no function. In the future should pages like this be speedied as an uncontroversial deletion or does it warrant discussion?
- ) 03:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I've been on Wikipedia for 8 years now and I've never heard of a "One Month Test" and don't understand why this would be abbreviated to "1MT". It's unlikely that anyone would stumble upon this page as it is only linked to from one archived talk page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essays/Assessment/Links so I don't think it is serving any purpose.
- ) 05:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: It looks like this WIkiProject never got off the ground, it only contains a Version 1.0 bot report.
August 2021
- talk · contribs) 04:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This is apparently a WikiProject task force page but the only edit to the page was to create it so I don't believe there is any support for this task force. It also has no talk page which is another sign of inactivity.
- ) 03:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: GQ is not an abbreviation for Equatorial Guinea that I am aware of. Editor who created this redirect then went to this WikiProject and added it as an WikiProject abbreviation which seems backwards to me.
- ) 03:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Similar to Equatorial Guinea, this redirect was created and then added to the WIkiProject as an abbreviation. I think this is unnecessary for little visited WikiProjects like this one.
- ) 03:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This WikiProject has an existing abbreviation (WP:MOZ) and doesn't really need another.
- ) 03:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Individual editors don't need redirects from project space to their user account page.
- ) 04:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: One final nomination, I don't believe this project page, that contains details about Wikipedia workshops at Fordham University that occurred several years ago, warrants a redirect. I doubt that any reader will be looking for this internal information page or use a redirect to locate it. Not every page needs a redirect especially in project space.
September 2021
- ) 02:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This article was tagged as a hoax but apparently existed but the only sources I could find for this TV show are blogs and IMDb and concern how shabby and unprofessional the production team was. I think it doesn't meet our notability standards. Existing isn't enough.
- ) 18:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This new article, which has received 114 edits in the 24 hours that it has existed, is full of BLP-violating claims that get put in and taken out. I've checked some of the sources through Google translation and they don't support the statements. I'm not sure that notability is established here, aside from the crime complaints, but it's clear that this article is the result of a news story or a discussion on social media. Given the flurry of activity, the article will probably undergo a lot of changes during the period of this AFD discussion and I'm hoping someone more familiar with Indian online sources can discern if there is anything here that should be retained. Thanks.
- ) 01:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I like humorous pages and have argued for several to be kept. But this isn't humorous, it's just dumb and it was created by sockpuppeteer User:Huff slush7264 who has stated he was a minor when he created his accounts. I really don't think it adds anything positive to the project and I think deleting it would actually make our editors smarter.
- ) 19:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: We don't have articles on sham marriage in other countries and I don't see anything in this article that makes the situation in the UK look unusual enough to warrant a separate article from Sham marriage. The argument for the first AfD still holds, I think the Delete/Merge arguments were stronger and this article has not been greatly improved in the 2+ years since the last AfD. Finally, 2 of the 3 "Keep" votes (User:E.M.Gregory and User:A.Jacobin) in the first AfD were sockpuppets and so I'd like to see if there is sufficient support now to keep this article.
- talk · contribs) 00:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I did a quick search and didn't find any mentions of this person by this nickname and it isn't mentioned in the article.
- ) 01:39, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: New editor has set up categories for themselves. I'm not sure if there is a CSD criteria that fits this situation.
- ) 01:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Editor category
- ) 21:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Granted I haven't seen every Samuel L. Jackson movie and I do know he swears many of them, this doesn't seem like a plausible search term if someone comes to Wikipedia, looking for the Samuel L. Jackson article.
October 2021
- ) 22:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This page was speedy deleted as an R3 because I thought it was a misnomer or vandalism but Uanfala appealed the deletion and a discussion ensued my talk pages. Although Uanfala had a link to some uses of the term, it seems to be archaic to me. In considering this request, ask yourselves if "ejaculation" is ever used in a religious sense in the 21st century. I don't think we'll have any Puritans searching Wikipedia.
- ) 02:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I couldn't find usage of "Extreme Obscenity" online, and there isn't much in this article that distinguishes "Extreme Obscenity" from regular, old "Obscenity". I think this article should be deleted or redirected to Obscenity.
- ) 21:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This is an unused template now. All of the schools listed are long-standing red links or are articles that were recently deleted through PRODS.
- ) 19:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: All listings on this template were PROD'd and deleted. Template no longer used on any articles.
November 2021
- talk · contribs) 21:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I think this is destined to be a small category and I don't see how it serves uniting editors on Wikipedia. Better as a userbox than category.
- talk · contribs) 21:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't believe we categorize editors by the brand of computer they use. At least, when I looked for other similar categories, I couldn't find them.
- ) 23:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I haven't read the Serbian sources but placing 5th in a national reality show doesn't demonstrate notability expected for musicians on Wikipedia.
- ) 05:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- ) 00:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm tagging this article for an AFD deletion discussion because two editors, one a created account and the other an IP, have asked for this article to be deleted through speedy deletion and through a PROD, stating that it contains incorrect information and also that they do not want an article on Wikipedia. The identity of these accounts has not been confirmed but I thought I'd bring the issue to AFD to see if there is a good argument for keeping this article should the subject wish to see it deleted. This isn't a typical AFD rationale but in 8 years I've only encountered a subject asking for article deletion 2 or 5 times before so I think it's worth considering the request.
- ) 04:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect was tagged for speedy deletion as nonsense, which it seems to be, but since it has existed since 2008, I thought it deserved to go to RFD in case any editor could understand why it was created and has not been deleted in 13 years. I couldn't find any reference to "Hayweauhdfkjakdahakhaya" on the target article or anywhere on Wikipedia.
- ) 01:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure what is the least impressive about this individual, his career as an entrepreneur, philanthropist or phone sex operator. While he seems to have received some coverage, I don't think he reaches Wikipedia's standards for notability.
- ) 22:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- ) 03:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I PROD'd this article because it was unsourced. Now, a few sources have been added to the bottom of the page but the content of the article is unverified and could be original researchfor all anyone can tell. It makes a lot of historical claims and tells detailed stories without any evidence of its accuracy.
- Reason: I PROD'd this article because it was unsourced. Now, a few sources have been added to the bottom of the page but the content of the article is unverified and could be
- ) 19:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The article, Coulrophilia, has been deleted through AFD twice (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coulrophilia, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coulrophilia (2nd nomination)) and the page title is now fully protected from recreation. I don't see the need for a template focused upon an article subject that will never exist on Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- ) 04:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
- ) 02:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: It seems like this category's title is vague and should specify if it is for the United States or all countries. But I'm asking for deletion as I can't see this as a potential new branch in our coverage of roads and highways.
- ) 02:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- ) 04:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Wikipedia doesn't have general categories for any the Asian Academy Creative Awards so these specific categories have no place here.
- ) 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Wikipedia doesn't have general categories for any the Asian Academy Creative Awards so these specific categories have no place here.
- ) 04:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- ) 03:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Although names are not mentioned this user page is one long rant about how they hate Wikipedia and how terrible it is, both the people who choose to spend their time editing it as well as Wikipedia policies. Delete per WP:POLEMIC
- Reason: Although names are not mentioned this user page is one long rant about how they hate Wikipedia and how terrible it is, both the people who choose to spend their time editing it as well as Wikipedia policies. Delete per
- ) 00:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I PROD'd this article and the tag was removed so I'm nominating this page for deletion. This is a financial adviser who has done some writing, which they all do, and published some books but hundreds of business books are published every year. I don't think that he is particularly notable except for those who subscribe to his newsletter.
- ) 00:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I admittedly do not read Persian but from what I can see, these references are generally passing mentions that do not establish notability. I had PROD'd this article but the tag was removed by the article creator. In my BEFORE search, I only came across other individuals named Hossein Tabrizi, not this film director.
- ) 22:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: As far as I can see, this page has only be referred to once but it's strange because it occurred in 2013 and this page was only created in October 2021. I don't think it is known to be a redirect or what the connection is between yelling and assuming good faith.
- ) 18:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I PROD'd this article because I don't believe this "digital marketer, social media influencer and reputation management expert" has SIGCOVbut the tag was removed so I'm initiating this deletion discussion. Usually folks in this field have published a few books that might have some coverage but that is not true in this case.
- Reason: I PROD'd this article because I don't believe this "digital marketer, social media influencer and reputation management expert" has
- ) 19:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Apparently, a previous version of this article was deleted by PROD so the new version is ineligible to be deleted by proposed deletion. I don't believe Nehring meets WP:NPOLfor notability which primary rests on the fact that he was very young when he was elected to a country council seat in Washington state.
- Reason: Apparently, a previous version of this article was deleted by PROD so the new version is ineligible to be deleted by proposed deletion. I don't believe Nehring meets
- ) 17:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: There is a lot of information in this article about the public response to Thunberg but there is no mention of "memes" about her on this encyclopedia. This may be a misleading redirect. I'm sure there are other words that better capture the response in art, politics and social media.
- ) 02:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: In my search online, I mainly found social media sources of information and user-generated sites, not newspaper articles and nothing indepth. We don't have a notability standard for astrologers and psychics but I'm surprised this article has been around for 7 years because there is really nothing here.
- ) 02:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This template was speedied and the CSD was declined. So, I'm nominating it for deletion at TFD. I see no use for it, it seems like a clear mistake.
- ) 01:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This seems similar to a category deleted in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 23#Category:Anti-vaccination activists who died of COVID-19. While it seems interesting to me to see, perhaps it would be better as a list. Since the other category was deleted, for this one to persist, it should be the result of another CFD discussion.
- ) 04:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't believe the references here support WP:GNGbut it couldn't be speedied A7 but there is a claim of significance. But a search just brought me social media and blog coverage.
- Reason: I don't believe the references here support
January 2022
- ) 02:08, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: As far as I can tell, the only feature of this group that meets WP:NMUSIC is the composition of a 1:15 minute long theme song for a 24 year-old anime Berserk (1997 TV series). This act doesn't seem like enough to warrant a Wikipedia article but maybe AFD regulars who review deletion discussions about musical groups can assure me that this accomplishment does make them notable.
- Reason: As far as I can tell, the only feature of this group that meets
- RfD; Target: International Union of Operating Engineers (notified); notified Enix150 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- CfD (CfR); renaming to Category:Wikipedia files reviewed on Wikimedia Commons; notified Mdaniels5757 (talk · contribs) 03:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure if this category should be renamed or deleted. I posted on User:Mdaniels5757's talk page, asking if this was a category created for a particular project he'd undertaken but he hasn't been active in over a month so I thought I'd bring this to CFD to see what the regulars here think and if you know what it is for. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- ) 05:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- ) 19:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: All articles included in this template were deleted through PRODs so it is unused.
February 2022
- ) 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think this redirect will be used or is useful especially since 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- ) 20:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Another overly long redirect title page that leads to the much shorter and more likely search term that is the actual title of the page. I think it is unlikely for the longer phrase will be typed in a search bar when the article title will pop up after the first 5 words. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- ) 20:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Neither "$$" or "$ $" are listed at the target page. On the other hand, $ is a redirect to Dollar sign which is logical target. I don't know what readers looking for a double dollar sign would be looking for but they won't find it at List of emoticons. Liz Read! Talk!20:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Neither "$$" or "$ $" are listed at the target page. On the other hand,
- ) 01:17, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This page was tagged for speedy deletion under "unspecified criteria" but I thought it best to send it to RFD. The reasoning was "The word "govno" is not discussed is this article, and it's NOT a russian mat word". I'm not sure what "mat" refers to but it is true that Govno is not mentioned at the target article.
- ) 20:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: First PROD'd in 2006 for failing to meet standards of notability and being promotional, I think this "contributing faculty member" (I'm not sure what that means) fails both WP:AUTHOR. In a search, I found other James Herndons more notable than him and even searches for "James N. Herndon" turned up more mentions for a dentist by this name than for this media psychologist.
- Reason: First PROD'd in 2006 for failing to meet standards of notability and being promotional, I think this "contributing faculty member" (I'm not sure what that means) fails both
- ) 01:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Civil servant who doesn't meet not inherited.
- Reason: Civil servant who doesn't meet
- ) 05:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Little used and not very informative template.
- ) 06:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Vague and subjective designation of a political leader. Seems to be the same articles classified under Category:Burmese Dictators which is redundant.
- ) 04:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I PROD'd this article but found it had already been PROD'd and deleted before but was eventually recreated. My PROD rationale was "Non-notable actress, sources cover her health issues with breast implants, not her career. At best, a cautionary tale about extreme breast surgery." AFDs require more than a PROD rationale does so I'll just say that Hershey doesn't meet WP:NACTORstandards.
- Reason: I PROD'd this article but found it had already been PROD'd and deleted before but was eventually recreated. My PROD rationale was "Non-notable actress, sources cover her health issues with breast implants, not her career. At best, a cautionary tale about extreme breast surgery." AFDs require more than a PROD rationale does so I'll just say that Hershey doesn't meet
- ) 21:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This is an overly complicated redirect that I believe is left over from a page move. No pages link to this page so there would not be any link corrections if this page was deleted.
March 2022
- ) 20:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I came across this article because of a lot of recent BLP vandalism to it and was struck by the fact that this guitarist doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC, at least from what I can see. Looking for sources, I found this and this, neither of which are cited in the article and I don't know if they are sufficient to establish notability for this musician since they don't focus, in depth, on his musical skills or performance. Other sites had just passing mentions, were details about tour dates or were social media accounts. Previous AFDs resulted in "Delete" and "No consensus" decisions and the last was in 2017 so I wanted to see what the current opinion was on the notability of this artist. Liz Read! Talk!20:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I came across this article because of a lot of recent BLP vandalism to it and was struck by the fact that this guitarist doesn't meet
- ) 04:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This was tagged for speedy deletion CSD R3 but I thought it was better to discuss whether this redirect is appropriate than judge it as a "misnomer".
- ) 04:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Like another AFD candidate, WP:AUTHOR. And I should probably file an SPI, too.
- Reason: Like another AFD candidate,
- ) 19:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: A producer notable because of one controversial film (of which he was an associate producer) and I think the article for the movie is sufficient. References are either passing mentions, don't mention him at all or are dead links. As a whole, not a notable career as an activist, film producer, DJ or media consultant, worthy of his own article on Wikipedia.
- ) 02:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This page was tagged as an implausible redirect and it is the translated title of a national anthem. I thought the editors at WP:RFDwould be the best judges of whether it was indeed implausible. Thank you.
- Reason: This page was tagged as an implausible redirect and it is the translated title of a national anthem. I thought the editors at
- ) 00:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This page was tagged CSD G7 by an IP editor and the page creator protested, asking for it to be taken to AFD instead so I'm obliging them. I don't think this article has WP:SIGCOVfor this person though I think that is common with streamers, especially the numerous teenage streamers. He is mentioned as being a "rapper" but there is no information in the article about any music produced or released by him so I guess he is an amateur rapper. This article probably should have started as a Draft and gone through AFC review but here we are.
- Reason: This page was tagged CSD G7 by an IP editor and the page creator protested, asking for it to be taken to AFD instead so I'm obliging them. I don't think this article has
- ) 01:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Almost unsourced, seems to violate Wikipedia:No original research completely. Translated but without the additional sources of that article. Moved to Draft space where it could be worked on but moved back to main space, I think prematurely. Liz Read! Talk! 01:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Liz, "Translated but without the additional sources of that article" - it is original research? Little deceiver You could transfer the sources from the original article yourself. Are you aware of the template's existence? I will transfer them, but later. Now it is inconvenient to do this - I am in a bomb shelter, we are being bombed. Best regards, --Pavlo1 (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- ) 00:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect was tagged with a speedy deletion tag with no valid criteria offered. So I untagged it but I also question the usefulness of this redirect so I thought I'd send it to RFD for evaluation, if you can see a reason for its presence on Wikipedia.
- ) 17:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Over 18 years, this list has been expanded and recently gutted of most of its content. But, looking at the talk page, the criteria of what should be included here has always been sketchy and I don't see the page fulfilling the content guidelines described at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. This is a decent subject for Wikipedia to cover but even if some editor or some WikiProject wants to take it on as a project, it might be better to start from scratch. Right now, it promises information that it doesn't deliver and its presence on Wikipedia is not a positive.
- ) 23:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Lots of weak references that I don't think add up to WP:BASIC. Being a guest on a show that won an Emmy is not the same as winning the Emmy. He touts himself as a musician but I aside from joining a band on tour, I don't know what his musical skills are. His main claim to fame now seems to be as a podcaster but his bio is really all over the map, with periodic columns on websites and listed "appearances" which I don't think can establish notability. I guessed at what categories to assign for deletion sorting as he mainly seems to be known for being known.
- Reason: Lots of weak references that I don't think add up to
April 2022
- ) 05:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This category doesn't fit into existing category hierarchy.
- ) 01:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This page was tagged for speedy deletion and untagged. It is only transcluded on one page and I couldn't find similar infobox album templates so it might be an outlier. I'd ask the page creator but they haven't been actively recently.
- ) 01:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm hoping the regulars here know whether or not Wikipedia categorizes according to "by constituent entities of the Russian Federation". In my quick search, I could only find this phrasing on 5 categories created today by editor User:Boxes12. If there is another appropriate category, this category could be merged. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
- RfD; Target: List of symbols designated by the Anti-Defamation League as hate symbols (notified); notified Dronebogus (talk · contribs) 01:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: To me, the way this is worded makes it look like these are symbols of "AFD Hate". These are symbols designated as hate symbols by the AFD but are not "AFD hate symbols". I know that redirects can be abbreviations of phrases but I think this one is misleading.
- ) 02:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: A new editor tagged this article for speedy deletion as "vandalism". I removed the CSD tag and thought it was better to consider this article at AFD. It is so superlative (a novelist! a professor! a champion martial artist!) that it reads like a hoax article. I found evidence of his academic articles that have been published but nothing about the 900 gold medals he has supposedly earned. If it matters, much of this same content is repeated in his Amazon profile. It's unusual for an academic bio to be such an over-the-top exaggeration, I mean, it sounds like there is a super hero teaching at Fayetteville State University.
- ) 22:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect was originally pointing to Tom K. Musau but somehow, through a series of page moves, it has become targeted to Raila Odinga, a politician and businessman with no connection to Musau. Tom K. Musau was deleted through a PROD and this redirect should have been deleted but because its target had been changed, it wasn't deleted and now needs to go to RFD to reaffirm that there is no connection between the redirect subject and the target article. Thank you.
- ) 22:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I thought this was a hoax article but apparently, it is a television show that has an outlandish premise and very little coverage. It was PROD'd, which I'd expect these days, but was de-PROD and so I'm bringing this to AFD to see if any program that airs on a television network is notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia.
- ) 22:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Ferris Bueller's Day Off was one movie, not a movie franchise and an unsuccessful TV series was attempted. Many of the links here are to lists of episodes of other TV shows that have allusions to this film or no connection at all to this film. I don't think this template serves a needed purpose or is likely to be used on many pages.
June 2022
- ) 01:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This unsourced article was moved to Draft space and recreated it main space. It was PROD'd and de-PROD'd so I guess AFD is the next step for this local "holy place".
- RfD; Target: Phonetic notation of the American Heritage Dictionary (notified); notified Nardog (talk · contribs) 13:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect is the result of a page move discussed at MfD here. It was discussed previously at this RfD five years ago. It was kept because of concern about existing links to this project page but the ones that exist now are from archived User or MOS talk pages or from pages that track cross-namespace redirects. Since the MFD, the target page, Phonetic notation of the American Heritage Dictionary, has had several other moves so I think whatever rationale existed in 2017 is no longer pertinent. Liz Read! Talk! 13:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- ) 13:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Because of the nature of this page title ("Project: "), this page is also classified as Wikipedia:Failing Fleshwhich is confusing. The only link to the Project page are from User space. I suggest either deletion or removing the colon from the page title so that this doesn't appear to be a cross-namespace redirect.
- Reason: Because of the nature of this page title ("Project: "), this page is also classified as
- ) 14:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Another cross-namespace redirect, yes, it has existed for quite a while but the only links to this page are from two User space subpages. And I also can not find the term "Geouf" any where on the target space, as either a word or acronym.
- Anthonie Palamedesz(notified) 23:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't see the point of this redirect which is just the name of the article with a period at the end. The only link here is from a User page. Its existence would just confuse readers searching for the actual article Anthonie Palamedesz.
- Reason: I don't see the point of this redirect which is just the name of the article with a period at the end. The only link here is from a User page. Its existence would just confuse readers searching for the actual article
- ) 22:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I was just correcting broken redirects that resulted from vandalism page move of the Clarence Thomas article and came across this one. It is recently created but isn't the result of a mistake, misnomer or typo so I thought I'd bring it to RFD as it seems as inappropriate as moving the Thomas article to a new title that has now been revision deleted from the page.
July 2022
- ) 18:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: There is not a clear connection between "Shi Hao" and Posthumous name as far as I can see by Googling. There is Shi Hao (bobsledder) who is a living person. This mixup caused this page to be tagged as an attack page but I'm sending it to RFD in case there is some connection between the page name and the target that has been missed here. This redirect has existed for quite a few years without challenges so perhaps there is something here that we are not seeing. Thank you.
August 2022
- ) 00:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This user page is an eyesore and has a quote in Serbian that Google translates as "If Draža's flag were flying, there would be no Albania - and there would be Ravne Gora on the three southern Serbian seas!" This apparently is a reference to Draža Mihailović a revolutionary who was executed for treason and war crimes. While I have a relaxed view on User pages, I think this one is non-neutral and serves no purpose, especially since the editor is a blocked sockmaster. Other userpages have come through MFD and been deleted.
- ) 00:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Unused personal photo. Out of scope. I PROD'd this file and it was de-PROD'd so I'm nominating it here.
- ) 17:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Unused template. All of the articles listed on it have been deleted through AFD.
- ) 18:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Also unused and it looks like all of the articles included on this template were never created.
- ) 21:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Unused except for on 2013 Maccabiah Games, it is just a collection of redlinks and one article that is likely to be deleted at AFD soon. A recent trend at AFD has been to delete sport specific articles connected to the Maccabiah Games so it is unlikely that these redlinks will become articles in the near future.
- ) 02:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This is a complicated story. The article Letha Weapons was deleted via AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letha Weapons. Then it was recreated soon after by Polycarpa aurata. I deleted it as a CSD G4 but it was restored to User space after a Deletion Review. It was then moved to main space where it was again quickly nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letha Weapons (2nd nomination). In a highly unusual move, the page creator closed the AFD themselves and moved the article back to their User space. For some reason, GoldenAgeFan1 is listed in the page history as the page creator but they actually nominated this article for deletion in the first AFD. I'm not sure why it's not Polycarpa aurata because they actually wrote this draft. The page history of this page is kind of mixed up with Letha Weapons's as GoldenAgeFan1's AFD shows up in this User space version, not the deleted main space version and the article has been deleted and recreated and moved several times.The reason why I even nominated this page for MFD consideration though is that Polycarpa aurata was identified as a sockpuppet of World's Lamest Critic. But I don't think this page is eligible for CSD G5 because, technically, GoldenAgeFan1 is listed at the page creator even though they sought to have a previous version of this article deleted. I was going to try to sort this out with GoldenAgeFan1 but they are an inactive editor so I decided to just send this to MFD as is and see what the MFD regulars think. Thank you, in advance, for reviewing this long nomination statement taking the time to review it.
September 2022
- ) 23:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR standards. His notability comes from being in a famous family, not his acting. Also, an ongoing problem of article subject editing his own article (which he created) so COI involved here. Originally PROD'd but an IP editor removed the PROD tag.
- ) 00:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This stub was PROD'd and I de-PROD'd it after seeing in the page history that this article had been subject to a previous VFD (the predecessor to AFD). But, apparently, it was an incomplete VFD proposal and no discussion occurred. So, I'm following through on my mistaken de-PRODding and nominating this stub article for a full deletion discussion. The deletion rationale for the PROD was "non-notable, could find no news articles on this artist".
- ) 19:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Only transcluded to one page, an article that has been nominated for an AFD deletion discussion, most listed articles are red links, it's just too soon for this template to serve a useful purpose.
October 2022
- RfD; Target: Happy Wheels(notified) 21:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't quite understand this redirect, apparently http://www.totaljerkface.com is a source used for some citations but I don't see the relevance of the term Totaljerkface to this game enough that readers would be using it to try to find this article.
- ) 21:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: All of the articles this template once listed have been deleted and it is unlikely that these season articles will be recreated given the current consensus about notability in sports/athletes.
November 2022
- ) 21:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: All of the alphabetical pages listed in this template were deleted in an AFD discussion so I don't think the template really serves a purpose any longer. It's only transcluded on one article now which is also listed on this template.
- ) 07:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I was looking at all of the redirect deletions that were a part of this RFD discussion and one of these "anti-white racism" redirects pointed to this category. I know the guidelines for redirects are different than that guidelines for categories but I thought since all of these associated redirects were deleted, I would at least raise the question here at CFD. Thank you.
- ) 22:51, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect seems to have no connection to its target page. I think it is associated with a different Minimax company, not the subject of the Minimax article on WIkipedia.
- ) 23:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This article was tagged as a CSD G4 but when I looked at the previous version it was different from this one. However, this version is equally promotional and I don't believe it meets WP:GNGso I'm renominating it.
- Reason: This article was tagged as a CSD G4 but when I looked at the previous version it was different from this one. However, this version is equally promotional and I don't believe it meets
- ) 04:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This was previously at AFD last year in an interesting AFD that saw substantial participation from the article subject and an AFD closure by a sockpuppet of Expertwikiguy. In my BEFORE search, I found passing mentions and even going to Forte's own website, to the Press section, found very few articles of substance. During my search for Joe Forte, I primarily found references to a basketball player with the same name, Joseph Forte. I'm suggesting that this page be redirected to Firewall (film), his only major success that, unfortunately, got poor reviews.Joe Forte
- ) 21:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Little used template, created by a now stale sockpuppet of Maximum023. There are four separate links to The Woodsman but they are are all links to the same article. Other mentions on this template are to articles by sockpuppets that have now been deleted. There are two films where he is listed as a violinist but he is not mentioned at the articles.
December 2022
- ) 06:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This User page has already been brought to MFD with a closure of No consensus. However, since that time, it has become evident that this editor sometimes makes up their own content that is not supported by sources, hence, OR. If this hadn't already been brought to MFD, I'd tag this as a hoax article but since it has been to MFD already, I'm sending it back for further review now that their other contributions have been reverted or sent to AFD. I have no confidence that this article is based in fact.
- ) 04:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I PROD'd this list because I was concerned about the lack of sourcing. There are many individuals named on this list as having a bounty on their heads and we don't have articles on that individual on Wikipedia that could be used as some sort of verification (and I realize that Wikipedia can not be used as a source but it would have citations on it). This seems like a potential BLP nightmare to be identifying individuals by name as terrorists without any referencing to a source.There is a DOS website listed as the source of information for this "Terror List" but I didn't have much success navigating it to find confirmation for some of these people. I think there should be direct citations or this list should be deleted.
- ) 23:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This page is showing up on a Quarry query we use as a broken redirect, I assume because it is an article page redirected to a Special page. I'd like it to not show up every time we run the query as an error page so I'm just bringing it to RFD to ask whether it's acceptable to link an article page to Special pages which are not-articles and I don't think are intended to be used by readers. I doubt that this is even a useful redirect as it lists millions of pages in alphabetical order which is not how readers want to search for an article of interest. Thanks.
- ) 03:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: David Weintraub seems to primarily be known as a talent manager, having celebrity friends and for working on a variety of reality shows. But besides the two sources listed (one passing mention but the LA Times cite is decent), a quick search came up with other individuals who share his name and his LinkedIn profile (and a sexual assault charge). He seems to have a decent career in Hollywood but I don't think he meets WP:CREATIVE. I'm frankly surprised that this is the first time it's been nominated for an AFD discussion.
- Reason: David Weintraub seems to primarily be known as a talent manager, having celebrity friends and for working on a variety of reality shows. But besides the two sources listed (one passing mention but the LA Times cite is decent), a quick search came up with other individuals who share his name and his LinkedIn profile (and a sexual assault charge). He seems to have a decent career in Hollywood but I don't think he meets
- ) 02:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Ten years ago, the consensus was that this article should be a redirect to the main Avatar article on characters. It was just recreated so I wanted to see if opinion has changed. This page was created in one edit which led me to think it was a copyright violation but using Earwig, it seems that only a portion of the article seems to be taken from another source.
January 2023
- ) 20:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While I don't doubt that over its 22 year history there has been religious bias on Wikipedia, the majority of the claims in this artice are vague and unsourced. I think the article should be moved to Draft space until the accusations in the article can be supported with reliable sources because right now it seems like a lot of original research. I could have just moved it to Draft space but page moves can always be reverted if the page creator objects so I'm bringing it to AFD to get a more consensus-based verdict on what should happen to this article. I see potential in the topic but there are just a lot of general claims of bias and I don't think it is main space-ready. I can see this article appearing on Wikipedia in 2006 but it's 2023 and Wikipedia now requires more verification, especially on potentially controversial subjects. I ask that it be moved to Draft or User space for now.
- ) 18:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure what this talk page is intended for but it appears weekly on Wikipedia:Database reports/Orphaned talk subpages. I posted a query about this on Pppery's talk page and they stated they thought it was useless and suggested nominating it for deletion at MFD so here we are. If it is serving a purpose and should be kept, perhaps someone knows of a way to ensure it doesn't appear every week as an orphaned talk page on the database report. Thank you.
- ) 19:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I see this as falling into WP:SMALLCAT and can't foresee it holding any other articles other than the one that defines what "adultism" supposedly is. The other categories in the parent category Category:Prejudice and discrimination by typeare full of related articles that pertain to those subjects but I don't see the potential for growth for this category.
- Reason: I see this as falling into
- ) 15:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Most of the articles listed on this template have been deleted through Proposed Deletion and have been unlinked. This template now appears on just three articles and I don't it is needed any longer.
- ) 15:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This is related to the previous nomination, all but two articles listed here have been deleted and unlinked. This template isn't transcluded on any pages.
- ) 01:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I am not sure how to categorize this individual's profession but given the weight of this article upon her education, I'm going to say that she doesn't meet WP:PROF. In my online search get mentions of her in "the media", her website and social media accounts but being in the press doesn't equate to notability on Wikipedia.
- Reason: I am not sure how to categorize this individual's profession but given the weight of this article upon her education, I'm going to say that she doesn't meet
February 2023
- ) 02:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Right now, just a collection of red links.
- ) 04:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I was looking at all of the other "goat sex" redirects that were deleted tonight and decided to look at the contributions of the editor who created at least some of them. I don't think this is a likely search term though it technically is correct.
- ) 20:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure how important this is for templates, but this is the only template in both Category:Arab Nations Basketball Championship squad navigational boxes or Category:Egypt national basketball team templates so although it is trancluded on to a couple of players pages, it is not part of an organized series of templates for past or present Arab Nations Basketball Championships national squads.
- ) 02:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I wasn't aware of this editor and the media coverage he received in 2018 for his editing focus until I did a CSD G13 deletion of this draft yesterday. I thought that was the end of it. But then an IP editor immediately went to REFUND today to ask that the draft be restored so I thought I would bring it to MFD to start a discussion on the appropriateness of having draft articles on our fellow unidentified editors. While we do have List of Wikipedia people for individuals who edit the project and become notable, I'm doubtful that it is wise to have articles written about anonymous editors even if their activity is covered by mainstream media. While I have doubts that this would ever get to main space, I'm proposing that this draft get deleted to set an informal precedence against articles on anonymous editors, especially ones that don't receive lasting media coverage.
March 2023
- ) 08:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I was just clued into the existence of these subpages marked "Temp" that no one would ever come across while editing the articles they concern. I assume that this one is no longer needed but don't see a relevant CSD criteria that would cover its deletion. So, I'm starting this MFD to weigh in on this particular page but also see if there is a general opinion on what to do with these Temp pages, most of which are from at 8 year ago (or older). I guess it was a common practice back then to put questionable content on a subpage but when no editors know that it even exists, I don't think it serves any purpose to help improve the article. Thanks.
- ) 20:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I think this template was created prematurely before main space articles were created. Currently, the main article on this group is in Draft space.
- ) 17:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think it is appropriate or consistent with Wikipedia's category structure to categorize by occupation and political philosophy unless an article subject is associated with politics. I just got done tagging an empty category for Category:Nationalist journalists and found the same editor had created this category for Nationalist musicians.
- ) 18:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: These men are more well-known for their controversial behavior on social media than their musical careers so they fail WP:BAND. Also the first AFD that was held soonafter this article was created was less than decisive in determining to Keep this article. I think their notoriety might have increased in the past year but not their musical success.
- Reason: These men are more well-known for their controversial behavior on social media than their musical careers so they fail
- ) 00:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Article for musician created by the article subject (User:Nickjtownsend) whose edits focused on their autobiography and an article on their band (Weak13, now deleted) and one of their albums. Admins can see their deleted edits. Online search found social media accounts and two Q&As but nothing I would consider SIGCOV. I see no lasting coverage of this musician.
- ) 07:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't believe this actor meets WP:NACTOR. He hasn't had significant roles in films and has only appeared in a few episodes of TV series, nothing lead or recurring. I don't believe he meets our standards of notability for actors.
- Reason: I don't believe this actor meets
April 2023
- ) 00:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Academic who doesn't meet WP:NPROF. While this isn't a reason for deletion, this article has been a magnet for sockpuppets who've created a lot of articles on local professors.
- Reason: Academic who doesn't meet
- ) 03:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I move this obvious draft article to Draft space but the page creator insists on moving it repeatedly to main space despite its unsuitability and I expect a PROD tag would be removed which leaves AFD. I'm not adverse to Draftification if the article creator agrees to allow the AFC process to occur instead of just putting AFC tags on their page.
- ) 03:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: In my quick check through several other states' city council members categories, it looks like we have category trees by city and sometimes gender and race but no category division by political party. I think in many locations, these are non-partisan offices so I'm not sure if this is a new category tree that should be created.
- ) 07:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This article survived a PROD but several editors who researched this article believe it is a hoax. It was tagged for speedy deletion but I think it deserves the consideration that an AFD can bring rather than a quick admin evaluation. Please review the talk page for the ongoing discussion.
May 2023
- ) 17:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Doesn't seem to be a template that will be used on many articles.
- ) 17:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: No existing articles to include in this template for Venezuela.
- ) 17:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another Venezuela-specific pageant template for no existing articles. Feel free to bundle these together.
- ) 17:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another Venezuela-specific pageant template for no existing articles. There are additional ones but I'll tag them later. These templates are the only pages included in several categories.
- ) 04:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I think this is an unlikely search term for "Arrests of Ulysses S. Grant".
- ) 16:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I nominated similar templates for Venezuela at male pageants on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 3 and there was almost unanimous support for deletion so I thought I'd nominate this one as well. Unlike the others, this template lists some existing articles but I think it's limited scope of subject matter will make it used on very few articles.
- ) 03:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I PROD'd this article with the statement "I was going to remove the unsourced content but that is basically the entire article so instead I will tag it for Proposed deletion as Original research." The PROD tag was removed and it was suggested that I bring this to AFD. Undoubtedly, a decent article on this subject could be written but this version seems to be almost all original research on the subject with some bits taken from a military archived page. It would be nice if editors who focus on the military could take this article on as a writing project but we can't dictate to other editors how to spend their time. As an alternative, we could reduce this to a stub, keeping just the sections that is supported by sources.
- ) 19:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect exists because of a sockpuppet hijacking an article about Jawid Safi, a cricket player, and trying to turn it into an article about a Javad (or Jawid) Safaee, a singer. I think having this redirect from a bad-intentioned page move is just encouragement for future attempts from this sockfarm to turn this redirect page into an article. I don't think it is a likely search term either. Thanks.
- ) 19:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Adding this redirect to the other one.
June 2023
- ) 06:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This is a convoluted article title but I can't delete it via speedy deletion as it is the result of a page move. So, I'm sending it to RFD to see if anyone agrees that it should be deleted. By the way, there are a ton of other redirects to this article as well that link to this page.
July 2023
- ) 02:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This page was tagged as a CSD G6, a page made in error. But it wasn't obvious enough to me. Frankly though I don't see a connection between this page and the redirect target.
- RfD; Target: Gothic hilted British infantry swords(notified) 17:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Unnecessarily long page title, unlikely to be a search term.
- ) 02:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect was originally tagged as vandalism. I don't see how it's vandalism but I also don't understand how it is a valid name for this historic person. I did a search for "Elizabeth Ambatukam Siddall" and got no results.
August 2023
- ) 19:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think that essays in Wikipedia space, even those tagged as "humorous" should encourage vandalism. "Humorous" shouldn't be a "Get out of jail" card that allows you to say all sorts of things that would otherwise be considered improper. I have no problem if this is moved to User space but I don't think it should be in project space.
- ) 03:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I see no connection between this Redirect and the Redirect target article.
- ) 04:55, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect seems very POINTY and reflects a political POV. Also as only Donald Trump has been indicted, and not other family members, it seems inaccurate.
- ) 05:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I think this is some in-joke but I see no connection between Daniel Razon and this group. Also, the redirect creator created a number of questionable pages and is currently blocked.
September 2023
- ) 00:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This category, with its unclear scope or purpose, only seems to be for the use of the category creator, User:Abishekdascs. I removed inappropriately categorized User pages but was reverted so I'm sending this case to CFD.
- ) 23:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While this article subject won a huge amount of money in one poker game 11 years ago, I think they are a good example of WP:BLP1Efame. I also don't think the sources we have are independent reliable sources, they seem blogish to me.
- Reason: While this article subject won a huge amount of money in one poker game 11 years ago, I think they are a good example of
- ) 16:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: These categories have always only contained categories for Jews. It would be fine if they were expanded and contained categories for other ethnicities and nationalities but as they exist now, they seem redundant to only contain one category for one ethnicity.
- ) 03:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't believe we need a category devoted to this historic Islamic scholar.
- ) 16:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This category seems to exist for editors who use one particular userbox which right now is one editor. The category is uncategorized so I'm not sure where it fits into User template categories and whether or not this is a proper use. I don't know whether there is the likelihood of expansion.
- ) 02:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I question whether this template is useful or whether keeping an up-to-date listing of every People's Deputy is going to be easy to maintain. Ideally, at least in my understanding, templates should not need to be frequently updated. Also, this template is simply used on the article of everyone mentioned on it so it doesn't seem to serve an informational purpose when their position can just be mentioned in the article content.
October 2023
- ) 02:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I admittedly know little about taxonomy on Wikipedia but there is no article on Nanopusillus in main space and only two passing mentions. I don't see where this template would be used.
- ) 17:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Isn't it a little early for this template? This is the only spring 2024 standings template we have for baseball for any conference or league. It would seem more appropriate to create these in 4 to 6 months.
- ) 22:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This Redirect, which looks like it's coming from project space, is linked to a User page with a questionable essay that is currently being discussed at MFD. Since it's unclear whether or not the User page will be deleted, I thought I'd go ahead and nominate the Redirect. I don't think essays in User space should have redirects coming from project space. It's also highly unlikely that this User page will be moved over to project space at this point without a complete rewrite.
November 2023
- ) 01:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: A recent bundled AFD nomination (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1979 Sligo Intermediate Football Championship) resulted in the deletion of many articles listed on this template. Currently, there are no existing articles that this template links to so I don't think it is serving a purpose.
- ) 21:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I was just tagging Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: University of the Republic, Uruguay as an empty category (CSD C1) and noticed this template which isn't being used by any editor. Are these university userboxes typically deleted or retained in case there is a need for it in the future? By the way, Twinkle is posting this at MFD even though it is a template. I guess this is where userbox discussions go.
- ) 00:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: The article on the subject, Elisa Jordana was deleted through the fifth AFD on this subject so I don't think keeping this template serves a purpose. It is also not currently used on any article on the project.
- ) 06:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This wasn't a bombing but a car accident. This redirect should be removed as it is misleading. There was no bomb or bombing.
- ) 21:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure of the common outcomes at RFD discussions about misspellings in Redirect page titles but this is a bad one. Plus, we already have Radical Party of Great Britainas a correctly spelled Redirect page.
- Reason: I'm not sure of the common outcomes at RFD discussions about misspellings in Redirect page titles but this is a bad one. Plus, we already have
December 2023
- ) 07:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I see no connection between Rizafilm and the target article [[Rizatriptan[[. It has nothing to do with film, and is not mentioned on the target article anywhere.
- RfD; Target: Rizatriptan(notified) 07:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I see no connection between Rizafilm and the target article [[Rizatriptan[[. It has nothing to do with film, and is not mentioned on the target article anywhere
- ) 05:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think this spelling is useful or a likely search term. If it could be moved to a different spelling in the page title, perhaps that would be a better solution than deletion.
January 2024
- ) 17:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: It seems like a small incident in a much larger conflict and could be Deleted or at best Merged to Saiful Azam as it is already mentioned in less detail at Six-Day War. If the consensus is that it should kept, I think a different title might be appropriate as Pakistan wasn't a major participant in this war. This also might be a borderline contentious topic as Pakistan isn't an "Arab" country this did involve an Israel-Arab conflict. I don't deal much with articles in the contentious topic area so I thought a discussion would be best.
- ) 23:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: Randomly created statistics data page that doesn't have much to do with Wikipedia:Size of Wikipedia and probably duplicates Wikipedia:Size of Wikipedia/2001 archived data. I might have a different opinion if these pages existed for the past 22 years but this is an isolated project page that doesn't link to any other project page.
- ) 04:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm unsure if this redirect is an insult directed at DeSantis or if this is a nickname used in the press. But I would think if it is kept, it should be retargeted to this article.
- ) 22:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: This category was previously deleted year ago in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 14#Category:Public domain characters. Part of one argument is that this content should be listified rather than having a separate category for what could be a huge category. Since it was deleted before, I thought I'd bring it back to CFD to see if this decision should be overturned or carried out as a CSD G4-type of deletion.
- ) 18:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: This 13 year old template is a box of red links and looks like it is completely unused. I came across it on a deleted page which looks like the last time it was added to an article. Given the kind of books that are listed ("World's Greatest!") I doubt these articles will be written and if they existed, they might have been deleted.
February 2024
- ) 07:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: This term isn't mentioned at the target article, I'm not sure how helpful it is to have this redirect on the project as it seems like a tasteless joke. If it is in common use, then I'll reconsider but right now, I'm advocating getting rid of this.
March 2024
- ) 08:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I think when this redirect was created many years ago, it was for a different Mike Rowe as the current target article is not about a TV host.
- ) 08:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: Target article is not about a television host.
- ) 08:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure what this title refers to but it has nothing to do with the target article
- ) 03:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: There is no Dem article so I'm not sure where this category belongs in the category hierarchy. Should it be deleted or merged somewhere else?
- ) 01:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: Karthik Naralasetty has some sources on his life and company, a 30 under 30 article and some promotional content, he won an award 13 years ago, I don't think it provides SIGCOV or establishes GNG.I was going to PROD this article until I found that it not only has been PROD'd but has had two previous AFDs, one closed as Delete, the second as No consensus. The article on his company, SocialBlood was Soft Deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialblood. I thought it was time to reexamine this article and consider whether it meets the stricter standards of today's Wikipedia.
- CfD (CfM); merging to Category:Films about diseases and disorders; notified Stefanomione (talk · contribs) 01:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't understand why we have two such similiar categories. I'm finding articles put in both categories. Either the categories need to be renamed to make their distinction clear or one needs to be merged into the other.
- ) 03:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I see only a loose connection between this redirect and the target article. There is a link with the Cadenheads but "old raj"? But I might not be up on lingo for distilleries. I came upon this redirect, one of many created by this editor while tagging some of the category creations.
- ) 18:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not sure if this template is necessary as the page is blank. There is hidden code but I don't know whether it is serving any purpose.
- RfD; Target: Krste Misirkov Institute for the Macedonian Language (notified); notified Super Dromaeosaurus (talk · contribs) 01:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I think this is a very awkwardly phrased redirect that is unlikely to be the way a reader would search for this article. This page title is close to the actual name so if a reader used these words, the article would appear in the search results so I don't think this redirect serves any useful purpose.
April 2024
- ) 01:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm nominating this category and, by extension Category:Italian company editors and Category:Italian company editors by type because I can't find a definition on Wikipedia of what a "company editor" is and so I don't know who would or would not be included in this category. Categorization on Wikipedia is not supposed to be ambiguous and so I think either a definition should be included on a main space article or this category needs to be deleted or renamed.
- ) 20:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I don't think a redirect from main space to a special page is useful for our readers and the page title is so ambiguous that it isn't clear at all that it pertains to the editing process on the project. There is already a link in the left-hand side menu and editors who watch recent changes know where to find this page. Readers who have nothing to do with editing are more likely to think that "New changes" pertains to something going on in the world. I also think we need to be careful with redirects that point outside the main space of the project.
May 2024
- ) 05:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: I think this userbox crosses the line into controversial and unacceptable. And it is morally offensive.
- ) 22:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: Granted that I don't know what reference sources would discuss this Christian animated children's show but I didn't find anything in my online search that wasn't either user-generated content, product-focused (promotion) or sites that allowed users to view episodes. I found no secondary sources or SIGCOV. One site called it an "award-winning" show but I never could locate what that award was. Given the detail of content about the characters, I think this article mainly serves as a nostalgia page for IP editors to write about a series they might have watched when they were younger. Dare I say it? I don't think it is notable or encyclopedic.
- ) 06:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: This redirect was tagged for speedy deletion but the tag removed with the statement that this nickname is "a real thing". I doubt this so I'm sending this to RFD. I can't see where the legitimacy of this insult is documented. There seems to be a long history of insulting redirects for political figures and I'm hoping that the redirect experts at RFD will be able to make a judgment on this one.
June 2024
- ) 02:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: Vice President of Communications for the Tampa Airport, winner of multiple small awards doesn't establish WP:GNGfor this article subject. In my BEFORE, I could only find mentions related to her work at the airport. The Emmy awards might be notable but they were regional and I wasn't prepared to watch a video to see if this claim was verified.
- Reason: Vice President of Communications for the Tampa Airport, winner of multiple small awards doesn't establish