User talk:Enix150

Mathglot, citation added. Though I was under the impression that entries in disambiguation pages and List-Class articles didn't require citation if it is present in the linked article. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 01:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your impression seems like a reasonable one, and I wasn't sure if it was policy or not, as I could see it going either way. I checked around and it's not quite the case; here's what I found:

WP:MINREF. My original revert of the IP was due to the fact that at least some of the IP's three items looked like compound words, not portmanteaus to me, so I thought they deserved a cite, to settle the question. (Probably a lot of other words on the page do, too; but it's a volunteer project, and someone else can deal with the rest.) Given my doubts and the removal, my reading of those two links is that the items should be cited. But it could be the case that some of the words don't require it, although maybe not for the reason you stated. The reason you gave could still be out there somewhere as guideline or policy, and if you find it, could you please ping me, and let me know? Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pigasus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nam kaeng hua chai thao

added a link pointing to Pepper

Tom som

added a link pointing to Thai

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohnoitsjamie, hey mate, I don't believe I was spamming, though I can see why my repetitive edits might have been flagged as such. My additions stem from a debate over the List of portmanteaus wherein some users have questioned the etymologies of some of these portmanteaux and deleted them for not having citation specifically referring to their origin. I found a source that references many of these words as portmanteaus, so I was adding the citation to each word's appropriate article. If this was in error or there was something wrong with my formatting please let me know. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 04:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were indeed

WP:COI, which may apply here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Ohnoitsjamie, now I am very confused. Why would this be a conflict of interest? Can you please explain why you see this as spamming? Thanks! Enix150 (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

WP:RS and simply lists a bunch of portmanteaus, and isn't very useful anyway. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Ohnoitsjamie, ok, thank you! Yes, that source is basically just a list of etymologies, which is why I thought it was perfect to cite these words officially as portmanteaux. The next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus though, I will point users toward this conversation. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your concern was referencing the List of portmanteaus page then there was absolutely no need to shoehorn refs into dozens of other articles. I came here from the Telegraphy article where I thought that your insertion concerning cablegram was an unnecessary diversion of the flow of the article. We don't need etymological information everywhere a portmanteau or acronym is used. Maybe when the word is the article headword, but even then, only if we have something interestingly encyclopaedic to say about it. Otherwise, leave that sort of stuff to Wiktionary. SpinningSpark 17:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spinningspark, thank you for your help. I will quote this next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spinningspark, thank you for your help. I will quote this next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Better to quote policy and guidelines rather than my opinion.

WP:V, that referencing is required in the list article page itself. What other articles say and what references they contain does not matter, Wikipedia cannot reference itself. SpinningSpark 21:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cryptochrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photoreceptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The alien bounty hunters are also shapeshifters. 184.152.237.222 (talk) 08:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Colonists are now mentioned in the shapeshifting article. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 09:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Qult of Qirli and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5#Qult of Qirli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Makavians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Makavians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pepe the Frog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Trumpanzees and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 28#Trumpanzees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schwagstock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluff.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saliha Mahmood-Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thermobaric weapon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foxhole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glamazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LSM-775, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Periphery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've been doing additions recently to the draft article for The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch. I found some more mainstream references you can use if you wish, as I don't have the time right now. nytimes.com, kutv.com, newsweek.com, ksl.com. None of these are currently being used as references and all mention the TV series. 5Q5|^✉ 14:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 20:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christie Palmerston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pathfinder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to explain re

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UAPx. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 21:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per below comment, I cannot establish notability yet, I'm close but not yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UAPx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 07:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enix150! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 07:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dragon International Film Studios

added a link pointing to Hollywood

List of portmanteaus

added a link pointing to Tollywood

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Three Sisters (Australia)

added links pointing to Nepean and Katoomba

Banana flour

added a link pointing to Coagulant

Leinster Downs

added a link pointing to Pini

Palepai

added a link pointing to Motif

SS Kuring-gai

added a link pointing to Manly

Si-Te-Cah

added a link pointing to Duck decoy

Titjikala

added a link pointing to Mount Franklin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Three Sisters (Australia)

added links pointing to Nepean and Katoomba

Leinster Downs

added a link pointing to Pini

Palepai

added a link pointing to Motif

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apropos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chris Knight (anthropologist)

added a link pointing to Yanyuwa

Dadi Toka Jr

added a link pointing to Motu

Glitter

added a link pointing to Colgate

Microbead

added a link pointing to Colgate

Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015

added a link pointing to Colgate

Parish of Nocoleche

added a link pointing to Kunja

Parish of Peka

added a link pointing to Kunja

Toothpaste

added a link pointing to Colgate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Parish of Nocoleche

added a link pointing to Kunja

Parish of Peka

added a link pointing to Kunja

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ptolemaic dynasty

added a link pointing to Arsinoe

Shakshouka

added a link pointing to Ottoman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ptolemaic dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arsinoe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bavarian cream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neufchâtel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ⏫ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § ⏫ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ⏬ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § ⏬ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 🛋️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § 🛋️ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect A✳️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § A✳️ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 👩‍💻 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25 § 👩‍💻 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 🫸 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 27 § 🫸 until a consensus is reached. The Banner talk 20:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Incognito and Nonentity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Misophaes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § Misophaes until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 🫗 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 🫗 until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 🏚️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 🏚️ until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 👯‍♂️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 👯‍♂️ until a consensus is reached. Qwerfjkltalk 17:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 💁‍♀️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 💁‍♀️ until a consensus is reached. MicrobiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•cultures)} 13:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enix150

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MicrobiologyMarcus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MicrobiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•cultures)} 13:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 💁 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 💁 until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 18:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 🧑‍🦳 has been listed at

The redirect 🔞 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 16 § 🔞 until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Swe-bop has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Swe-bop until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ☄️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 25 § ☄️ until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You stated in your edit summary for this edit that derelict house is not an emoji and that it's printworthy. Why? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

🏚️ is the emoji based on that symbol. All Unicode symbols and Unicode-approved emojis that I've seen have been tagged as printworthy, so I continued with this pattern. Hope this clears things up. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure, thanks. So why would you think these are all printworthy? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After this discussion and this discussion ended without a real consensus, I've been filling in all of the R from emoji templates with the emojis' official names. I noticed that all of the Unicode-approved emoji/symbol redirects whose templates were already properly filled out also included the printworthy tag, so I continued with that pattern. Do you have reason to believe that it would be unprintworthy? Enix150 (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable, thanks. Yes: 1.) I've never seen a print encyclopedia that had "derelict house emoji" in it 2.) I don't know where/how these would be sorted as entries in a print encyclopedia, and 3.) I find it very unlikely that someone would go to a print encyclopedia for this: virtually by necessity, someone encountering these emojis will have a digital device and it would be infinitely easier to look it up using copy/paste online than it would be to crack open 6.5 million articles of the English language Wikipedia. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ㊙ has been listed at

@

Fram: I agree only one or neither tag should be used, but I haven't marked any redirects as unprintworthy as far as I know. Can you show me what you mean? Enix150 (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

🏴󠁭󠁭󠀰󠀲󠁿 (Flag of Bago Region) also have redirects to their State flags, and each of the 50 US State flag emojis have redirects to their respective flags too. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Just so I'm clear, I'm not at all looking to nominate them for deletion. We were just looking to try to understand what these were viewed in that resulted in them actually being viewable. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good! I was a little worried the emoji redirect discussions would return. Sorry, I'm not sure, but there is a Firefox plugin called Character Identifier that confirmed the flag names for what it's worth. Maybe I'll try to ask someone I've seen using it which setup they use. Enix150 (talk) 20:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Redwop has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Redwop until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]