User talk:LaneFrost00

Hi LaneFrost00! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is .

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use

WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 21:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An article you recently created,

Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Ladarius Galloway, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 19:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FCF Shoulda Been Stars logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:2021 Wild Aces season. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2022 Shoulda Been Stars season. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Shoulda Been Stars seasons. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Shoulda Been Stars seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indoor football.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Shoulda Been Stars seasons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Storchy (talk) 08:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Shoulda Been Stars seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shoulda Been Stars seasons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Storchy (talk) 17:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of SB Stars starting quarterbacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of SB Stars starting quarterbacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SB Stars statistics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SB Stars statistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The People's Championship v1.0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The People's Championship v1.0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Template:2021 FCF season by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mdelnegro12. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not believe I should be blocked for sockpuppetting because I do not have multiple accounts or have made multiple accounts in the past. I have a love for the Fan Controlled Football League and I want to make it a very nice wiki to look at as it hasn't been kept up to date. I will start using the draft function from now on and add sources to all media.LaneFrost00 (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is based on technical evidence, which is not outweighed by your denial. PhilKnight (talk) 20:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LaneFrost00 (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:People's Championships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm very sorry I did not read the terms and rules. I did not know my one of three computers was signed into a different account and some times I wasn't logged in at all. I would like to ask to be unblocked and if I do, do this again just to ban me. I will try to improve when I am unblocked. LaneFrost00 (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You just said that you don't have multiple accounts. Now you're saying that you were logged into a different account? You need to explain this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am unsure about multiple accounts. I do know that on some occasions I was not signed in and was on a seprate IP address.

Decline reason:

Well, if you can't keep straight what account you were using, then this is going to happen again if you are unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LaneFrost00 (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 01:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 01:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 02:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FCF Shoulda Been Stars wordart.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:People's Champions v1.0 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Template:Infobox FCF event has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LaneFrost00. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am very sorry if i have made it difficult for you guys by using multiple accounts, i honestly didnt know any of them were being blocked and i didnt mean to get around any blocks you may have done. Contributing to the wiki is one of my favorite things to do and would like to ask for an unblock. And also i am in no relation to User:Mdelnegro12 who i have been accused of mimicing.

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As the blocking administrator it would be improper of me to formally review this request, but I will say this: you have got to be joking, you have been evading this block through an IP, and through multiple different accounts (LaneFrost2000, LaneFrost01). At least you had the decency to make the usernames obviously similar to this one, so I don't see an attempt to deny the connection, but you simply are not allowed to edit here in any way. Your only recourse at this point is the

standard offer. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

My original block was because of being sockpuppet to User:Mdelnegro12, who I have no affiliation with LaneFrost00 (talk) 18:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add for the benefit of any admin who comes along to review this request: the IP this account most regularly edits from is currently blocked, not for block evasion, but for vandalism. There are no other accounts on that IP but the socks of this account, and the vandalism was coming from an identical device the use. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could i do the standard offer? I would like to know my guidelines. LaneFrost00 (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Follow the link and read what it says. No more socking, and no more logged-out scatological vandalism for six months, and an unblock request might be considered. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May I do Draft articles to practice what to and what not to do during the 6 months? LaneFrost00 (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. You do nothing for the next six months. You certainly don't blank the contents of articles and replace them with the word 'poo' like you did a few weeks ago (unless that was someone else using your computer on an IP address that nobody else uses). Go away, grow up a bit, and come back when you're prepared to contribute constructively and take responsibility for your actions. You are, however, still permitted to contribute to other Wikimedia projects, like Commons. Doing productive work there might make us better inclined to unblock you over here. Girth Summit _(blether) 21:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

when did i replace it with poo LaneFrost00 (talk) 15:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:Mdelnegro12 is not my account nor anyone i associated with. Yes I have multiple accounts on dofferent devices but I never tried to use them as a way around a block. There was also no way for you to know or have any proof i was a sockpuppeted account. Ive never heard of him until i found out I was blocked one day. Please do some more investigating because I am not a sockpuppet, though i have multiple accounts for different computers. My accounts are User:LaneFrost00, User:LaneFrost01, and User:LaneFrost2000. All in no relation to User:Mdelnegro12.

Decline reason:

You were still sockpuppetering with the multiple accounts. Add to that there are OTHER accounts involved, and I'm declining this request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to request an unblock once again. I am willing to do a trial period like I was told about in other unblock requests. I would love to edit the wiki again and I promise to follow the rules this time around.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you are not yet eligible. Six months from April 24 was to be October 24. Six months from now is 2024-04-04. That's the soonest you'd be eligible under

WP:SO, and assumes zero edits between now and then. Yamla (talk) 21:41, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaneFrost00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to request another unblock request because I have seperate accounts for different devices which in the confines of the rules. I editted Fan Controlled Football and sockmaster was aswell and im still not a confirmed user in this situation. The sockmaster has no conection to my IP and i have no conection to it. By the time i found out i was blocked on one of my accounts i was using another one making it a misunderstanding and claiming i was a sockpuppet, which i wasnt to begin with. The investigation never proved me being guilty. It was all circumstantial. We both liked the same thing and now that ive read the investigation i know why you banned me but i assure you i am now a sockpuppeter. LaneFrost00 (talk) 21:46, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Besides the issue below, this really doesn't make much coherent sense. I'm not really sure you should be writing encyclopedia articles here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm removing talk page access at this point. This is become a time sink. You were told previously to not ask for an unblock until October. You were just told TODAY to not request until April 2024. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]