hors d'œuvres,cheeseplatters and similar). My favorite wikithings to do was working on Dog articles, but I stick my finger into everything. I especially hate plagiarism
of articles, something that can happen too often in this area. Currently, I'm looking for a new project, but have left my dog stuff here for now.
because so many times international standards vary slightly from one another, and sources have different and conflicting information on breed histories.
Remember: your article may be what someone will be looking at when they decide to purchase a dog. Tell them everything you would want to know, or wished you had known.
A dog article should:
Have the [Table], no matter how short the rest of the article is
Have a descriptive Appearance section, especially if there is no photo, keeping in mind differing standards
Use subsections when needed, especially for colour
Have other sections about the dog, especially Temperament
Avoid using one site for the source; the dog fancy is a complex and differing lot, and information gleened too heavily from one article or website may be biased or even wrong.
List the bad with the good
Link to national and international breed clubs and rescues in preference to dog breeders or personal home pages, except in cases of unique particular source material
Have more than one or two sentences in each section. If a section is that short, the article should probably just be a unbroken paragraph and is probably a stub.
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MelSkunk.
.svg){kind=small}
