User:voorts/The spectrum of coverage
This is an notability. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This essay in a nutshell:
|
Significance is in the middle of a spectrum of coverage. That spectrum runs from a
This essay proposes using a spectrum approach to determine whether a set of sources establishes notability. The spectrum approach recognizes that sources from the entire spectrum can be used to write articles, but that not all sources on the spectrum will contribute equally to the notability of a subject. Under this approach, at least some sources must contain significant coverage of a topic to establish that topic's notability.
The spectrum of coverage
The
The guideline can be read to define significant coverage as being on a spectrum of coverage: it is "more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." The guideline gives two examples that illustrate the spectrum of coverage:
In the first example, IBM is the "main topic of the source material", and in the second, the mention of Three Blind Mice is trivial because it is said in passing.
The spectrum of coverage is useful as a
Placing significance on the spectrum
Significance is in the middle of the spectrum of coverage. The general notability guideline defines "
Directly and in detail
A
The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization.
Significant coverage is not just slightly more than a trivial mention. Coverage that is direct and in detail must cover an aspect of a topic through a description, discussion, or analysis that has enough depth to allow editors to write an article from a neutral point of view with enough
Significance cannot be based on a
No original research
Coverage in a source is not significant if
On the spectrum of coverage, a
The spectrum approach to determining notability
The general notability guideline requires that a topic receive significant coverage in reliable sources. It does not require that each source have significant coverage for that source to count towards establishing notability.
The spectrum approach to determining notability is a framework for determining whether all sources, taken together, provide enough coverage to establish notability. This approach recognizes that sources from the entire spectrum can be used to write articles, but that not all sources on the spectrum will contribute equally to the notability of a subject. Generally, sources that contain only trivial mentions of a topic are not likely to establish notability because an article cannot be written on
See also
- Wikipedia:What is significant coverage?
- Wikipedia:Insignificant
- Wikipedia:Significant coverage not required
- Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill
- User:RoySmith/Three best sources
Notes
- ^ a b Emphasis added.
- ^ Citing Martin Walker (January 6, 1992). "Tough love child of Kennedy". The Guardian.
- ^ Notably, the guideline does not define the word "significant". Merriam-Webster defines "significant" as "of a noticeably or measurably large amount".[1]
- every sourcebe evaluated "separately and individually" for significant coverage.
References
- ^ "Significant". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. December 23, 2023. Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.