User talk:Ілля Криворучко

Hi Ілля Криворучко! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 14:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ілля Криворучко! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources added since the last review don't help in establishing this person's

reliable

, secondary sources; database sources which simply list the medalists at an event are not enough to meet this guideline. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denys Sylantyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Junior Championships.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Andriy Mykhaylychenko. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may check. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 01:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hilda-Danuta Zachariasiewicz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kseniya Grygorenko. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 06:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I confirmed the notability criteria of this swimming sportsman. If not, you may decline, I shall do this article better and in proper way. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Volodymyr Lisovets. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your move to draftspace. I tried to make the article in proper way with notability criteria, but I'm not sure. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 00:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The new sources aren't any better. We need to see significant coverage of this person, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volodymyr Lisovets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volodymyr Lisovets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recommendations of this draft. I've added some additional information about his life, studying and competing in major sportc ompetitions from Ukrainian and English sources. I think that's enough for a verification of this Ukrainian swimmer. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ілля Криворучко (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recommendations of this draft. I've added some additional information about his life, studying and competing in major sportc ompetitions from Ukrainian and English sources. I think that's enough for a verification of this Ukrainian swimmer.

Hi. I was wondering if you could explain why you made this move without first submitting the draft for review? Deb (talk) 16:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason of it is a mistake of making the move from main page to a draft. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject doesn't seem to meet the notability criteria. Please also work on improving the English.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volodymyr Lisovets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that I confirmed the notability criteria of this swimming sportsman. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pppery was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Andriy Mykhailychenko instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andriy Mykhaylychenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this page, thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User talk:FloridaArmy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

In reference to this message you left you on FloridaArmy's talk page, you are not an AfC reviewer not to mention there was no article attached to the decline notice. S0091 (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb this editor's behaviour is troubling. In addition to the above, they have misrepresented themselves on their User page which you reverted and updated several athlete's articles with unsourced additions. I find it dubious. S0091 (talk) 21:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean in simple words, pardon? I misunderstood your second sentence. Sorry for my troubling behavior if what. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you leave an AfC decline notice on FloridaArmy's talk page? You are not an AfC reviewer. And now you are trying speedy delete articles for no valid reason. S0091 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried speedy delete of my draft articles for no valid reason (if you meant about it) because these articles were not significant for a Wikipedia community and because there were the same articles as mine.

I declined notice because the subject didn't seem for me to meet the notability criteria. But after your revert I understood my mistake of that and promised never to do that. Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for communicating, Ілля Криворучко. I think I understand your reasons but the rules and history are complicated. I don't have time right now to explain so for now will leave you a Welcome message about editing English Wikipedia. Each language has their own rules so what may be fine on one may not be okay another. I will explain more to you about articles like Yuriy Yegoshin tomorrow. S0091 (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Some of the user's comments are clearly machine translations. Deb (talk) 09:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never use machine translations. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your revent. I shall never decline or accept articles of others, because I'm not an administrator. Sorry for your disturb. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ілля Криворучко,

Please review

Twinkle

to tag pages for a review for a possible deletion. But if you are not familiar with deletion processes and the guidelines about them, I encourage you to work on improving articles rather than seeking their deletion.

If you have questions about any of the points mentioned in these comments, please bring them to Wikipedia:Teahouse for advice, support and a second opinion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to say that I'm waiting for an accept or possible decline of my draft article about Ukrainian swimmer Volodymyr Lisovets, which is declined three times, and I thought to delete speedy this article, but I didn't do that after your piece of advice. Thanks!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2022 European Figure Skating Championships, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an official decision of Kamila Valieva's disqualification in the official web-site of Court of

Arbitration for Sport in here: https://www.tas-cas.org/en/general-information/news-detail/article/kamila-valieva-is-found-to-have-committed-an-anti-doping-rule-violation-and-sanctioned-with-a-four-y/ Ілля Криворучко (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know that, but if you read that carefully, you would see that the court specifically states that it cannot rule on matters of medal allocation. All they did was void Kamila’s scores. The governing body of a particular event (like the IOC or the IFS) has to make a determination regarding the medals. Which they have not yet done. Any edits other than to void Kamila’s scores constitute speculation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But as medals of Kamila are directly depending on her scores, which are annulled, these edits don't constitute speculation. CAS need not rule on matters of medal allocation, because the medal allocation directly depends on scores. As IOC and ISU must execute the CAS decision, the medal allocation will be evident. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, until those organizations make an announcement, you cannot speculate on what the outcome will be. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If those organizations make an announcement not to deprive all her medals tomorrow, you may tranqullly revert all edits in the articles about 2022 Winter Olympics and 2022 European Figure Skating Championships. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or you can not update articles based on events that haven’t happened yet. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your explanation and recommendations, I shall use your advice in future. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works, The

secondary source is needed. S0091 (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 17:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ілля Криворучко, I recommend you take some time to read through some of Wikipedia's core policies. The best starting place the

Original research policies in the second paragraph. There are many more policies and guidelines but those three will give you a good foundation. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please discuss instead of reverting. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ілля Криворучко, despite myself and other editors trying to explain why your editing is against policies and guidelines and pointing you to policies, you still continue the same pattern thus exhibiting

WP:I didn't hear that behaviour. If you continue, you will be blocked. S0091 (talk) 20:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ілля Криворучко!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional guidance

Hi again, Ілля Криворучко. First, stop placing AfC decline/accept templates on your talk page. As stated before, you are not an AfC reviewer so should not be using the templates and it is misleading so is disruptive. Second, for any content you add you need to provide a

reliable source to meet Wikipedia's verifiability

policy. Otherwise, the content may be removed by other editors.

As for articles like

speedy deletion criteria

.

For the articles you have created that were moved to draft, what you need to do is find at least two reliable sources that have written in-depth about them, like two or three paragraphs in each source. If you need additional guidance specifically about sports articles, I suggest asking at WikiProject Sports or try WikiProject Ukraine. S0091 (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my disruptive and too principal politics in Wikipedia.

I would like to apologize you for my permanent revents in Kamila Valieva's article in Wiki and for a possible war with editors. I noticed that lots of editors have a different opinion about the situation with medals and disqualification as I have, so I won't take part in editions of the articles about Kamila Valieva, Anna Shcherbakova and others, and also of 2022 Winter Olympics and 2022 European Figure Skating Championships, where Kamila had gold medals before disqualification. I'm sure that the consensus between editors will be reached soon.

Sincerely, Illia Kryvoruchko from Ukraine. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've reverted some edits on Nathan Chen's page because 3 numbered notes were deleted in the process. So I've re-added those deleted 3 notes + in order to avoid an edit war, I've re-added yours as note 1 for now. :) As mentioned, I don't want an edit war so just wanted to let you know. MovieTalk101178 (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ілля Криворучко, I will say this one more time. You need to cite reliable sources that explicitly support the claim(s) for content you add, that includes notes. S0091 (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! I noticed that the argument about the Olympic medals in team event exists now, so I don't take part in edits' war. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ілля Криворучко you need to add a reliable source for all the articles you edited today (ex. Nikita Katsalapov, Victoria Sinitsina, etc.) and anything you add going forward. If you do not, I will revert your changes and request you be blocked. S0091 (talk) 22:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: S0091, the notes they added are not an issue. Please see Talk:Figure skating at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Team event#Gold for USA.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inna Makhno moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inna Makhno (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Inna Makhno instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Why have you created a duplicate (such as it is) on the same topic as the published article, and submitted it?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inna Makhno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alina Chaplenko

Hi, I have moved this to the draftspace. There was no content apart from the infobox, so please work in the draftspace before publishing. I would also suggest going through Articles for Creation, as you previously had. TLA (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article, because it has a criteria for speedy deletion. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made proper editions to the draft. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposed blocking of User:Ілля_Криворучко. Thank you. TLA (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

Hi again Ілля Криворучко, its up to you but it might be a good idea to create your articles in draft space first then move them yourself to mainspace (article) when ready. To create page in draft space, just type the title in the search bar with Draft: in from front of it (like Draft:Person's Name) and click search. Underneath the search bar, there will be a note: The page "

WP:MOVE#How to move a page for instructions on how to move from Draft to (Article) as Person name (i.e. remove the Draft: prefix). It's easy. I emphasize, you are not required to do it this way. S0091 (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Another option if you do create a new article directly in article space is to place Template:In creation ( {{In creation}}) at the top of the article until you are done working on it, then remove it. S0091 (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Chaplenko has been accepted

Alina Chaplenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladyslav Iemelianchyk

Hello, Ілля Криворучко

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vladyslav Iemelianchyk for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CurryTime7-24 I removed your CSD tag because they just started the article and its not even been 10 minutes much less an hour. S0091 (talk) 21:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ілля Криворучко, I added the {{In creation}} template to give you some time to continue to develop the article. Once you are done, please remove it. S0091 (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Ілля Криворучко (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 To be clear, is it OK for the article to be published without information? My understanding is that it is not, but if I'm wrong, then I apologize. I only ask because a long time ago, I created the article Takahiro Sonoda, and it was sent back to draft within minutes of creation for a similar reason. (I think in my case, there was an article, but it either had no cited sources or was considered not to have enough. I forget at the moment.) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:NPPBIG3. S0091 (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

WP:G2, which I believed to be the case at the time of my review. When I first saw the article, the only information it contained was a name and what seemed to be part of an infobox: [1]. — CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@CurryTime7-24 take a look at it now that its been given 20-ish minutes. S0091 (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:G2 in good faith. It was not my intent to step on anybody's toes and I apologize for having done so inadvertently. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@CurryTime7-24 I have no doubt your actions are in good faith so no issue as far as that's concerned. Unfortunately this is now the fourth time it's happened to this editor (twice by an NPP reviewer, once by non-NPP and once by an admin). From what I have determined, Ілля generally starts with an infobox and works from there which is not wrong to do but leads to these issues. However, they work quickly so generally within 20 minutes or so, the article is formed. S0091 (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I will make sure to remember this and be more careful in the future. :) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andriy Fedchuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Junior Championships.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!! 😊 Ілля Криворучко (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few words

(Personal attack removed)

March 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 20:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oleh Plotnytskyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIVB Volleyball Challenger Cup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know about preview?

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the

help desk

for assistance. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kseniya Grygorenko (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kseniya Grygorenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]