User talk:136.34.132.39

Hello 136.34.132.39! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 22:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

Hello, I'm Wcquidditch. I noticed that you recently removed content from WLCC without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing

Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to KISS-FM have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 15:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to KBIZ—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 20:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WDGY, you may be blocked from editing. --Sable232 (talk) 23:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't make head or tail of what it is you think you're trying to do. Your changes to article leads seem to be completely random, doing one thing on one article and then the opposite on the next. The remainder of your edits will be reverted; please explain what it is you're doing before continuing, as this is disruptive. If you continue, you may be blocked without further warning. --Sable232 (talk) 23:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per your reply at User talk:2607:FB91:2F02:300E:F419:554F:2C34:84AF: Redirects are a feature, not a bug. If the link ultimately goes to the correct article, it is best to not change them. "St. Paul" is normally abbreviated in common usage, which is why it was that way on all of those articles.

You were also, in some articles, removing links to AM or FM and replacing them with a link to Hertz, but in other articles you did the opposite. I don't know if one is better to use than the other, but changing them for the sake of change isn't helpful.

You removed one of the translators from an article with no explanation; I checked the frequency and it's still broadcasting WDGY. You later added that translator to another article, which is clearly incorrect.

Adding the network affiliations is fine, but it's best if you use an

cite the source you're using to determine that. --Sable232 (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at KZIS. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

136.34.132.39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So I wanted to clarify on the recent block. Although I don’t always provide an edit summary, I NEVER contribute to vandalism. I’m not sure who reported, but I saw no changes from my contributions nor any general notes, cautions, or warnings beforehand. The edits I did today were in recent news that Audacy would shut down its HD2 and HD3 music channels which people have reported them as inactive. 

Decline reason:

I'm going to decline this. I didn't see a single edit summary in your last 500 edits, and you don't add sourcing either. I'm not going to roll back all your edits because your note here suggests you're not editing in bad faith--but you are editing badly, so to speak. This a collaborative project, and nothing in those edits indicates that you are improving the articles. There is a simple solution to this, and if you think about that some you might include that in an unblock request. Your edits aren't vandalism, but they are disruptive. And that you didn't receive any additional warnings--well, you got a talk page full of them, and you know why you were blocked last time. Returning to the same disruptive behavior is going to lead to the same result. Drmies (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion through the IP Special:Contributions/65.28.77.182. Binksternet (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 December 2022, 136.34.132.39 was responsible for incorrectly deleting two legitimate affiliates from the WLAD page: WLAD's Gun Talk and the Money Pit are syndicated by Talk Shows USA. WLAD's Handel on the Law is syndicated by Premiere Networks, and WLAD formerly carried Casey Kasem's American Top 40 that is also syndicated by them. I restored the listing of these affiliates. 172.56.216.187 (talk) 07:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. I’ll try not to do that again without research. But I think The Money Pit is also syndicated by Radio America. So I also added that. 136.34.132.39 (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WTKK. Sundayclose (talk) 21:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WMQT. Sundayclose (talk) 01:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 01:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 136.34.132.39! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at KVMA (AM). Sundayclose (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lourdes 10:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

• Until you confirm that you will start putting only cited content (see
  WP:V), your block will remain (for six months). Please confirm you will not put unsourced information again. Our editors do not have the time to keep checking multiple unsourced content for their validity. Thank you, Lourdes 10:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]