User talk:167.98.65.71

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that in this edit to Frantic Assembly, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as

, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoozaz1 talk 23:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National anthem have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: National anthem was changed by 167.98.65.71 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961233 on 2021-04-21T13:21:20+00:00

Thank you.

]

May 2021

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bel Powley—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RacoonyRE ^{Message me}_{Contributions} 13:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2010s seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to High five—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mansa Musa—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 13:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Mario Benedetti, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Confessing Church have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Herald. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brown bread have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rio Carnival seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 12:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matilda of Scotland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Entranced98 (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Matilda of Scotland, you may be blocked from editing. Entranced98 (talk) 12:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Synorem. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Charioteer of Delphi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Synorem (talk) 11:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charioteer of Delphi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 11:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]