User talk:47.149.9.31

talk · contribs ) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 47.149.9.31, is registered to Frontier Communications Corporation and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Thomas Welder without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 00:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thomas Welder, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. dibbydib 00:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --FFS19 (talk | contribs) 00:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thomas Welder; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Liam Treadwell. Ifnord (talk) 00:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.149.9.31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all, I do apologize for making a legal threat, I am just very angry with the administrators for reverting my edits (not an excuse for making legal threats) I am really sorry and I would never under any circumstance sue Wikipedia for something like that, I take back my threat. However, I am concerned with the fact that the administrators are not listening to me whilst I have been making edits and citing reliable sources such as Domo news: nhk.or.jp The death hoax is clear as day on that page, that is the only place where information of the death hoax is, you guys said that I need to provide evidence and the exact page, the admins cannot look for me, so there you go. 47.149.9.31 (talk) 01:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC) First of all, I do apologize for making a legal threat, I am just very angry with the administrators for reverting my edits (not an excuse for making legal threats) I am really sorry and I would never under any circumstance sue Wikipedia for something like that, I take back my threat. However, I am concerned with the fact that the administrators are not listening to me whilst I have been making edits and citing reliable sources such as Domo news: nhk.or.jp - The death hoax is clear as day on that page, that is the only place where information of the death hoax is, you guys said that I need to provide evidence and the exact page, the admins cannot look for me, so there you go. 47.149.9.31 (talk) 01:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you are removing death information from articles about people who definitely are dead (like Ian Holm, for example) as supported by multiple reliable sources - and I don't care what your Domo news web site says. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've merged your requests, as you only need one open request. Someone else will review it. 331dot (talk) 01:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Despite what the standard message above may indicate, there have been considerable issues with your contributions to biographical articles. When you are unblocked, please refrain from any further removal of notices of deaths, especially where they have reliable sources. Whatever sites you've been looking at to induce you to make those edits previously, they are feeding you fake news. --RexxS (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]