User talk:99.249.219.4

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 14:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC) AnomieBOT (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, cpe68b6fcf3d953-cm68b6fcf3d950.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (99.249.219.4), is registered to Rogers Cable and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at

• If you would like to experiment, please use the
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
  talk) 22:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to

Your edits at Vaporwave have the strong appearance of spamming, which is not accepted in Wikipedia. Given that the album was released yesterday, any suggestion that it has been recognized as an example of vaporwave style is not credible.

If the album is your work, please understand that this is not a critique of the music. You simply need to find other ways to promote it. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 01:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my work. The album, after one day of release, has cracked the top 300 (and climbing) most popular Vaporwave releases on Bandcamp.com, surpassing some of the most recognized albums in the genre, like Chuck Person's Eccojams Vol.1, and Fuji Grid TV's Prism Corporation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.219.4 (talk • contribs)

That is commendable so far as it goes, but it doesn't establish the album as a notable example of vaporwave style. What would establish it is a statement to that effect from a reliable source. Influential music gets recognized in writing all the time. There's no rush. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 02:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not link to rateyourmusic.com as a source. User generated sites are not accepted as reliable sources, and one only needs to look at rateyourmusic.com's address to see that it's user generated. Please read

WP:Identifying reliable sources

for more info. Also:

Your recent editing history at Vaporwave shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vaporwave. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vaporwave. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you've done wrong

Did you bother reading the notices on your page? The ones saying "don't add unsourced information" and "quit edit-warring"...? Then there's the part of my talk page saying "leave new messages at the bottom." If this site didn't operate off of text, I'd have to assume you were illiterate. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Troll needs blocking. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that some of the registered users were rough with you. I reported the editing dispute hoping that someone would intervene constructively, but I cannot control who responds to the report and how they act. If you want to continue contributing to Wikipedia please do so with the requirements of verifiability and reliable sourcing in mind. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 05:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vaporwave. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Vaporwave shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 99.249.219.4, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Humbug (album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Timid Orpheus, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, 99.249.219.4. It has been over six months since you last edited your

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]