User talk:Abhishikt

The article Ridit Nimdia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too soon for an article on this prodigy. The reference used only qualifies as trivial.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ridit Nimdia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridit Nimdia. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ridit Nimdia and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Ridit Nimdia, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ridit Nimdia
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ridit Nimdia. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ridit Nimdia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Regards,

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

I left a response to your inquiry. Short answer: it's an editing dispute, not vandalism, you should discuss it, and if that doesn't work, see the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Shadowjams (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

Katrina is a bad choice according to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject as is more known for making landfall as a Cat 3 in the GOM.Jason Rees (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

{{unblock-auto|1=131.107.0.81|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JSL5871". The reason given for JSL5871's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".|3=MLauba|4=2065969}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): IPBE to be granted. Request handled by: Daniel Case (talk) Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

Thanks for raising the question at my talk page, I've replied there. . . dave souza, talk 09:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Fighting Gravity does not link to the performers on America's Got Talent. Cresix (talk) 02:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

Is it possible that your edits to the article, seeking to promote controversial aspects far beyond their due weight, is motivated by your being an atheist, and is therefore a kind of POV editing on your part? -Stevertigo (t | log | c) 06:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishikt. You have new messages at Stevertigo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I am curious as to why you do not sign your posts on the talk pages? Is there any particular reason? I am interested. Also signing posts is part of the guidelines here at Wikipedia. Please read:

Unfortunately I have not come across a way to sign posts automatically. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

The article Prometheus (film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Prometheus (film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Abhishikt. I am not preaching, I have merely pointed out factual information. In accordance with Wikipedia policy, my contribution:

Contains No Original Research

Has a Neutral Point of View

Is Completely Verifiable

So what is your problem ? Do you have a prejudice against Christianity ? The teaching of Jesus and the Apostles recorded in the Bible is directly relevant and important to the subject.

AHA ! Now I see it ! Your user page reveals you to be a self-confessed atheist ! I challenge you: Read the Gospels in prayer, asking God to convince you whether it is true or false, and whether it is His word. Put Jesus teaching into practice. Then come back and tell me whether or not God exists. Give up your prejudice and check out the facts for a change ! Darkman101 (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Abhishikt. Just an FYI regarding your AfD of Atheism 3.0, it's generally customary to cast a vote in your own AfD noms (if you have an opinion on it, that is), since an editor may sometimes bring an article to AfD after discussion elsewhere when they don't, themselves, agree with the nom, or they may be undecided on the issue and only looking for discussion. As such, your nomination may or may not be counted as a delete vote, so you may wish to be explicit about your opinion. Also, while I'm here, would you mind linking your user page and/or talk page in your sig? You don't currently, which forces users to type the url in manually to find them. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 19:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, but I have already voted for deletion on 16th. I have improved my signature now as per your suggestion :) Abhishikt (talk) 20:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I missed that! Thanks for the signature change :) See you around!   — Jess· Δ♥ 01:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jess it is not supposed to be "votes".Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 01:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you too Abishka - this demonstrates that the way you went about the afd was flawed because you don't understand that you were supposed to have an indepth discussion of the ideas not a simple straw vote. The afd is itself voidable.But we are at a new poin t How bout this - would you please paste me a copy of the old article so I can see what the problems were? That would be constructive. Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right Devilishlyhandsome, that AfD is not "votes" and Jess probably conveyed it incorrectly, I guess he meant to convey that I should also state my reasons for deletion of that article. For previous version of the article, I saw though my changes history, but couldn't find it, you can probably contact an admin. BTW my name is Abhishikt. Abhishikt (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishikt, it seems that I am being given to understand for your then-current and apparently persisting resistance to WP coverage of this emerging trend in the intellectual history of popular atheist philosophy is that I should "contact an administrator" because you don't remember why. Gee whiz man. That resonates with Rick Warren's assertion that we should trust "God's Word" even if it makes no sense. Sorry, I can't participate in the fiction that this is a satisfactory explanation for the inexplicable collapse of

WP:CENSOR.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I thought I was being clear enough, and seem to have gotten my intention across to the editor I was addressing, but in any case... yes, obviously the AfD was not a straw poll. However, making one's support clear in an AfD discussion is instrumental to determining consensus. I believe this is all covered in

WP:ANI would be the place to go if you felt an admin had acted improperly.   — Jess· Δ♥ 02:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I wasn't necessarily asserting that he "acted improperly" by closing the afd, I assert that the afd of that old article, which had only two citations, stated four times, is irrelevant to the forced userfication of a new article which had many more citations, which IMHO was not consistent with policy. And I take exception to this mantra that somebody or other keeps repeating that supposedly the article is not sourced when in fact there are multiple verifiable reliable sources including published authors,a Harvard chaplain, a Ph D or two. And what is really just appalling is that anyone would think for a moment that failed afd constitutes a basis for excluded content...sorry but this all smacks of suppression of intellectual freedom. I wish you guys would simply let the new article stand on its merits. Sorry I can understand that you just went through an afd and although Anapum is a very competent researcher he did neglect to fully source the article and it doesn't seem that he conducted as vigorous a defense as was required. I have not given up hope that you will agree to re-open the matter - I would not object to a replacement into mainspace with a de novo afd. It is a new and different article with more sources and deserves its own fair hearing.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Devilishlyhandsome, we agree with you on the fact that AfD is not voting and we used the term incorrect in conveying the real intend. Shall we please call this a

WP:DEADHORSE. Abhishikt (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I reverted a substantial edit made without consensus. Just because four people in a contested process were able to for the time being prevent a poorly-documented (2 refs) article about a topic (Aeth 3.0) from its own freestanding article does not give you the right to unilaterally obliterate all mention of any author in that tradition, particularly under this kind of edit warning. Please do not do this again, thank you very much. Cheers.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided reasons for my change in the talk page of the article. Abhishikt (talk) 00:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and quite diligently, eloquently and gracefully. Thank you.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abhishikt, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions . We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

You appear to be engaged in an edit war at

Because you have participated in a related RfC on this article, or have recently contributed to it, you are hereby informed that your input would be highly appreciated on the new RfC here: [[1]]. Thank you! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We've already done the adding and removing of the recently died template to the article. Please have a look at the talk page. --GraemeL ^(talk) 22:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Atheism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anupam^Talk 05:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you bother to discuss the issue in the

WP:NPOV states "Editing from a neutral point of view (NPOV) means representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources." Thanks, Anupam^Talk 05:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Edit conflict- This is absurd. All I removed part of your additions giving reason that those are not verifiable and simply asked you to gain consensus and you are engaging in edit war without giving any reason or attempting to talk. and you post this warning on my talk page for doing only one revert??. Can you explain yourself? Abhishikt (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First you have to prove the notability and reliablility of the sources. Did you try to prove that or tried to gain consensus, as I had mentioned in my comments? Abhishikt (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you noticed my first edit summary, when the content was added, it stated "balanced findings with additional study + references per talk", where I discussed the addition of the study. If you object to the addition of the study, you should comment there rather than blindly reverting me. Also, contrary to what you stated above, you did not revert once, but twice. If you revert once more, you will have reached 3RR. In addition, to answer your question, the reference is reliable as it is taken from an academic journal. It is furthermore notable as the study was reported in CNN, among other forms of mass media. You would have obtained this information if you looked at the thread on the talk page I opened up. Rab Raakha, Anupam^Talk 05:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anupam, you actually reverted five times. Please stop templating editors with these unfounded warnings, misusing sources by twisting them to fit your POV, and reverting "as vandalism" when there is none. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ArtifexMayhem for your involvement. I see that Anupam himself, got reported on wp:ani for edit warring and wp:3RR. I have put in my comments there. Abhishikt (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you added "Above proposed sentence is to replace an existing sentence shown in below" to the RfC. The RfC proposal does not mean that the proposed sentence should replace an existing one. It only concerns itself with adding the proposed sentence. Both sentences can appear in the article; the two are not mutually exclusive. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 04:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From the edit history of Atheism article, I see that your proposed sentence was added in-place of the existing sentence I mentioned. And such replacement happened multiple times by multiple editors in the edit war there. Also I didn't see any comment from anyone that they are ok with both sentences. May be only you are Ok with both sentences and you can mention that as a part of your comment. Abhishikt (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the edit history, the only reason I reverted the addition of that sentence is to restore the content that I added. I have no problem with the sentence being in the article. I started the RfC and do not see a problem with having both sentences in the article. I would request that you please leave that block of text out of the RfC stem I started. If you'd like to propose another question, you're more than welcome to start another RfC. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 04:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Let me remove that part. Also I noted that in RfC stem you wrote "reincluded in the article", but the fact is that the sentence was not part of the article. The dispute began when it was added by you. Can you change it to something like "Added in the article" to make it accurate. Abhishikt (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Abhishikt, I hatted your proposal as an alternative in the RfC stem - that way it still appears on top. I also removed the prefix "re" from the word "included" as you requested. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 04:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you striked the alternative proposal. Thanks for that. Take care, Anupam^Talk 04:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see that you changed 'reincluded' to 'included'. Abhishikt (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed the Marathi banner above... I did some work with Tata Consultancy Services a few years back and spent around ten weeks at their offices in Pune. It is truly awesome part of the planet - great people, great food (being from Texas I like spicy), great scenery and great works - with Ellora Caves and Ajanta Caves being particularly impressive. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've made good improvements to the chess template, and I see that you are putting it in a lot of articles were it is needed. Good work! Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Hello, I've informed Administrator User:DGG about the revert. You can discuss the situation there. With regards, Anupam^Talk 03:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed an arbcom case related to the mailing list that you are alledged to be coordinating with. You can review the case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Anupam_.26_Bobrayner and provide a statement. Hipocrite (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words. bobrayner (talk) 06:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishikt, I note that you undid my edits on God of the Gaps, with a reference to Neutral Point of View. Please carefully review NPOV in the Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines and work with more care in the future. You will note that NPOV does not prevent an article accurately reporting on a topic which represents someone's point of view, nor does it proscribe a description of that point of view. The GOTG article provides plenty of references explaining that "God of the Gaps" is an inherently critical term for theological arguments that are deemed to be faulty. That discussion is expanded in the Talk page. The term was invented by Christian theologians to critique fallacious theology, just as the term "begging the question" was invented by logicians to critique fallacious logic. The GOTG article must make that clear. Mrdavenport (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Just so you'll know this edit destroyed auto-archiving on the fringe theories noticeboard. Try to be more careful about things like that. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 19:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

The article Nokia Lumia 610 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An individual handset is Not Notable (WP:N). All three or four (610/710/800/900) handsets could be merged under one article eg the 800. The note on a move from symbian to Win could easily be covered as a sentence there or in the general Nokia article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jabberwoch (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

It has been a week, and the primary issues have not yet been addressed. Are you planning to do anything about them? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 regarding an issue with which your opinion may be of value. Thanks -- I'm Titanium  ^chat 15:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 you commented on the quality of the article's content. Therefore perhaps you would like to contribute to a discussion at Talk:Bigg Boss 6#Summaries concerning the quality and quantity of plot-related content. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

The article Trojan Horse (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please contribute to the poll on Talk:Windows RT. (You are being asked because you commented on MS Surface.) Tuntable (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Hi , Please notice, ip user 111.243.0.198 and ip 114.39.7.129 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/111.243.0.198 , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/114.39.7.129, Vandalism a lot of articles , please stop these ip user , thank youMBINISIDLERS (talk) 08:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism of Jainism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Jainism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Rahul (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Criticism of Jainism and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Criticism of Jainism, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Jainism
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Criticism of Jainism. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Jainism saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmejudith (talk • contribs) 22:43, December 16, 2013‎

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sigmund Freud. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Medicine navs. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No offence or hard feelings was meant by my comment on the Chess Project Talk page about the table. I suspected that was the reason for the revert. I'd completely forgotten about that revert until you commented... Jkmaskell (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Newport Beach, California. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Julian calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider offering a comment on a discussion at Talk:2015_in_spaceflight#BRD_on_whether_satellite_orbital_explosions_are_notable.

Thank you very much. N2e (talk) 04:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-produced aircraft. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:College of Technology, Pantnagar. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I found your username listed under editors available for comments and picked you random. Please see Jehovah's Witnesses#RfC: Jehovah's Witnesses vs Watchtower SocietyRoller958 (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

RfC on the 'Veganism' article

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Order of approximation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Miniature Australian Shepherd. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:People of Jewish descent. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Periodic table. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishikt. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Silicon Alley. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abhishikt,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?

• Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
• An editor must have 500+ edits.
• Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here.
Regards.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox religious text. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The

Hello, Abhishikt. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply