User talk:AlexNewArtBot/PhilosophySearchResult

Philosophy NA‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles NA This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mode of presentation seems fine.

There are a number of false positives. As far as I am able to ascertain the list of search terms is as follows:

@@30@@
/\Wethic/
/\Whegel/
/\Woc(c|kh)am/
/\Wplato\W/
/aesthetic/
/analytic\sproposition/
/aquinas/
/aristote?l/
/\Watomis(t|m)/
/bertrand\srussell/
/c\.(\s)?i\.\slewis/
/cartesi/
/charles\speirce/
/charles\ssanders\speirce/
/critique\sof\spure\sreason/
/david\shume/
/deducti/
/descartes/
/determinis(t|m)/
/dialectic/
/edmund\shusserl/
/empiricis(t|m)/
/epistem/
/existentialis(t|m)/
/falsificationis(t|m)/
/falsifiability/
/francis\sbacon/
/free\swill/
/g\.(\s)?e\.\moore/
/george\sberkeley/
/gottlob\sfrege/
/hans\sreichenbach/
/hermeneutic/
/heuristic/
/hilary\sputnam/
/idealis(t|m)/
/immanuel\skant/
/\Winducti/
/instrumentalis(t|m)/
/john\sdewey/
/john\slocke/
/john\sstuart\smill/
/kantian/
/karl\spopper/
/kierkegaard/
/leibniz/
/\Wlogic/
/martin\sheidegger/
/materialis(t|m)/
/metaphysic/
/nietzsche/
/nominalis(t|m)/
/\Wontolog/
/paul\sfeyerabend/
/phenomenolog/
/philosoph/
/platonis(t|m)/
/positivis(t|m)/
/pragmatis(t|m)/
/rationalis(t|m)/
/realis(t|m)/
/reductionis(t|m)/
/rudolf\scarnap/
/scholastic/
/scientific\smethod/
/scientific\srevolution/
/socrat(es|ic)/
/solipsis(t|m)/
/subjectivis(t|m)/
/synthetic\sproposition/
/theory\sof\struth/
/thomas\shobbes/
/thomas\skuhn/
/verificationis(t|m)/
/vienna\scircle/
/w\.(\s)?v\.\quine/
/william\sjames/
/wittgenstein/
20 /category:[^\]]*epistemolog/
20 /category:[^\]]*metaphysic/
20 /category:[^\]]*ethic/
20 /category:[^\]]*moral/
20 /category:[^\]]*\Wontolog/
20 /category:[^\]]*philosoph/
20 /philo-book-stub\}\}/
20 /philosopher-stub\}\}/
20 /philo-stub\}\}/

The

Perhaps then, these terms should carry a somewhat lower weighting, and terms with a higher degree of specificity, a higher. For this to work however, the corpus of terms will definitely need to be expanded. Orthorhombic (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned by the bot's bent towards Western, materialist, rationalist philosophy. The following figures should definitely be considered for inclusion:

Mikhail Bakhtin
Mikhail Bakunin
Pavel Florensky
Vladimir Lossky
Maimonides
Vladimir Solovyev
Baruch Spinoza - if he hasn't been already
Theodor Adorno
Hannah Arendt
Walter Benjamin
Max Horkheimer
Emmanuel Lévinas
Leo Strauss
Henri Bergson 
John Duns Scotus

That is to say nothing of Indian, Chinese, African etc. philosophy, only one or two figures off the the top of my head that might help remedy the aforementioned tilt. Orthorhombic (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone explain why the above article appears to have been included? Orthorhombic (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question (