User talk:Andrew nixon

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 21:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article, Andrew, which I've rated B-class. What a tragedy: it shows how easily a life can be snuffed out. I suppose he must have lost his footing or his balance just as he was going to jump down. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 05:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maurits van Nierop, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

BorgQueen (talk) 17:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew. Dunno whether you spotted my response on the Wikiproject talk page. A summarised response here. Personally I think that a year is appropriate, although having the heading "current squad" perhaps isn't. Of course I am open to any other standardised criteria, and the discussion should probably be revived by the project.

With regard to your revert, I'll leave it until you respond, but I'd suggest it's switched back for now until criteria is set out by the project. It leaves the England list out of sync with the other international lists, as well as the criteria set out at the top. It leaves players who also aren't in the most recent squad (Bresnan, Tremlett, Vaughan), whilst removes Luke Wright (who is). Also, it removes Panesar's ODI "status" which is due to expire in a day or two. Regards HornetMike (talk) 20:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, I'd suggest renaming the heading, personally. But anyway, we should probably try and move this dicussion over to the project and get a wider consensus. HornetMike (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew, . If you want a category exclusively for cricketers that played just for the Northern Ireland cricket team, you will need to think of different title. This title should be open to any cricketer born in NI regardless of whether they played for NI or not. The title suggests it is about a cricketers nationality and not which team he played for. I would suggest Northern Ireland international cricketers as a possible title. Djln --Djln (talk) 21:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, although I could do with reinforcements. YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model!) 07:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew, could you have a look at this question, please, and let us know your views? I think we may be well advised to apply English naming conventions to Australia. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 10:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very good work, Andrew, and I've rated it a B-class with mid importance. All the best. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 15:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew,

I've finally finished the dual country thing. It's all in the international section. Have a look at

Many thanks for the infobox. JH (talk page) 18:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew. Do you have any idea whether or not these matches are going to have List A status or not? Normally I wouldn't expect them to but the 2007 ICC World Cricket League Division Two matches did so I'm wondering if this extends to Division 3? Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt response. I'm hoping to see the Afghans qualify for the next stage. Jevansen (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the infobox. A couple of minor poiints: Do you have a source for the nickname "Mossy"? I don't recall having heard it before. Also, in the "bowling style", would it be better to put leg-spin first, as being the style with which he took the great majority of his wickets? (Or failing that, to say in the body of the article that that was his msin style.) JH (talk page) 22:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'd be happier if we could find a second source, as I haven't found Cricinfo altogether reliable. I just had a look for my copy of Richard Streeton's biography, but I couldn't lay my hands on it. JH (talk page) 10:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with your revert. Please weigh in at Talk:Cricket#.22Old_Flemish.22 to help support consensus. --Dweller (talk) 11:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Derick Etwaroo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derick Etwaroo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. §hawnpoo 17:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew I notice you have twice reverted my contributions with regard to John Crawfurd which I am sure you have good reason to do. John Crawfurd was my grandfather's brother and I have much information about how he came to study at Oxford including how he started to play cricket. He was, in fact the grandson of John Crawfurd who was the First Resident of Singapore, an important colonial figure from the nineteenth century. All this is publicly available.

Please could you explain your reason for reversion; I hope that it is not to just keep the biography about cricket, but I am sure you could help in this matter.

Best regards Justin Lavender --Jjdlavender (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew, As a regular contributor to the cricket page, I was wondering whether you had any comments / concerns about the New Lead [[2]] I'm proposing. I'd be grateful for your input. Many thanks. David T Tokyo (talk) 07:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you're involved with cricketeurope4.net (IIRC), I thought you'd be the right person to ask what NCU means in the context of this article.

Template:Infobox Women's Cricketer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Apologies for the bog standard boilerplate notice, just figured it'd be simpler that way! — AMBerry (talk) 01:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew. I reverted the last one in error when in fact I meant to go right back to the last definitive edit by Jevansen. That's the trouble sometimes when you get a succession of these vandals. Anyway, I think it's okay now. All the best in 2010. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 07:11, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Trevin Bastiampillai - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Rupert Gomes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Asim Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Andrew, when is Raees making his next blog post on Cricket Europe? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 11:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting us know and for exhibiting your proper knowledge and your professional behaviour. No worries, cheers! Thanks!-- Uqahr (talk) 03:56, 3 June, 2010 (UTC)

Reply:I don't want to argue, but will i tell you straight forward. You have no right to accussed other people without providing evidence. And also Test match cricket in Australia tradionally begins at 11:00 am, ask any professional cricketer. I don't care what you say and other people say. You are intitled to your opinion and i have the right to my own opinion. There just jealous and your just jealous, please leave me alone and do not bother me with your childish issues. I will not revert if you provide proper explanations only. Thank you. --Uqahr (talk) 06:40, 3 June (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing the IRISH flag from the 2011 Cricket World Cup? Its quite clear that Irish Cricket team is union of the 2 countries, hence this flag is being used.--Karyasuman (talk) 10:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why arent you replying?--Karyasuman (talk) 10:40, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. then the flags of the national countries are not used by many teams. This does notmean that we cannot use the flag of the national country to represent that team.--Karyasuman (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the guy in the know about most things relating to Associate and Affiliate cricket, do some of the T20 matches at the Asian games have T20 International status or are they purely exhibition matches? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first play-off game at Knowsley Road could be the last game to be played there. It's looking likely that not that many more games will be played at Knowsley Road, Belle Vue, the Willows or Wheldon Road and we have very few free-to-use images of them (although the ones we have, particularly of Wheldon Road are very good). I wouldn't like to see our material on these historic grounds go the same way as the very limited material we have for the historic Boulevard Ground, Thrum Hall or the Parkside Ground. If you will be at the next play-off game at Knowsely Road or if you are able to get any pictures of these grounds I would be very gratefull if you could upload them to commons. I can sort out the categories and such if you don't have any time. Alternatively if you know of anyone who could it would be much appreciated. I am unlikely to go to any away games next season because of my current circumstances so will not be able to contribute towards this, although I shall endevour to get some great images at home games (I've a load of the CC final to upload but there sat it a very long backlog).

Kind Regards, Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So where is it to be held.KestevenBullet (talk) 15:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Cricket for an article for The Signpost. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Thanks and I take this opportunity to wish you a very Happy New Year! – SMasters (talk) 07:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a issue in WT:CRIC that needs your vote. Thanks --ashwinikalantri ^talk 06:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrew nixon. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket.
Message added 20:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks.

Mtking (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! I'm user from Latvian Wikipedia. I really want to write some articles about the most known Cricket players in Latvian, but I don't know about whom should I write about. So could you tell me please who could be considered the most famous and greatest players (current and all-time) — some 5-10.--Edgars2007 (Talk/Contributions) 14:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andrew, hopefully you can help with me with the article I've created on

Ah knew you'd be able to sort it! Seems CA has got confused along the way! Thanks Andrew. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Andrew, much appreciated. Pass my thanks on to the Dutch editor! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew. I'm fine, thanks, but have had a really busy year. I hope you're okay too. I've added a section called ICC lists which I think is very useful. All the best. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 17:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re- your post on WPC. My belief is that it is becoming a despotism. Reports tell me some other areas are the same. Perhaps we should just leave Jack to edit 1750 etc. I would point out that it contains many errors even allowing for other issues. TMA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.100.75 (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked the news before removing my addition. I post a link for you here. Please check it. http://www.bdnews24.com/details.php?id=211550&cid=26

One more, for people like you whose job is deleting other's information, you are culprit of wikipedia. Because of people like you, no one get interest to spend time to add information on wikipedia. I sincerely request you, do multiple check before removing someone's adding information. We do not get paid here to add info, so when someone add info by spending valuable time, that means a lot.

The Turks and Caicos Islands are a small place, so I wonder if this Oliver Williams, who played for them from 2003/04-2007/08, is also this Oliver Williams? Perhaps your excellent knowledge of beyond the Test world might be able to answer that question! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How did you land that? I've always fancied writing a blog or something similar on cricket. I'd love to write for a magazine one day - I love cricket and am rather opinionated (though not pushy!) always enjoy a chat about the game with a fellow enthusiast, just never known where to start. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 19:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts? *chews nails* S.G.^(GH) _ping! 08:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, he is getting more deluded by the day! I guess soon the whole of WP will be a sock of BlackJack's! Love how he rabbles on about the unemployed. Considering the amount of effort he seems to be putting into trolling, you have to assume that with so much time on his hands, unemployed would describe him accurately! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know whenever and wherever he strikes. I'll restrict his movements...! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More than happy to seek further action if this continues Andrew, the harassment is now clearly unacceptable on a number of levels, so I'd ask you to keep me in touch with all the times this user attempts to abuse you (or anyone else should you become aware of it) and I will pursue actions to prevent this user from harassing and abusing you (and others) in the future. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm watching, too. Btw, I'm Jack, and so is my wife. --Dweller (talk) 06:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See my proposal to rename Category:Cricket at the South Pacific Games to Category:Cricket at the Pacific Games Hugo999 (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it true that from next season Irish domestic cricket will be restructed and hold first-class status? Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From this article: "Ireland, whose performance has stood out among the non-Test playing countries, cannot just be a "breeding ground" for England, Holdsworth said. "We were very grateful for ICC's recent boost to our funding to permit us to implement a domestic first class structure in 2013 and play more international fixtures against the Full Members."

I have seen some good results for the Dutch youngsters, but it's where they kick on from there. Ireland has the structure in place for those kids to progress in the game, the Dutch less so. Kinda like Afghan u-16s losing to Iran u-16s the other year, play that match two years later with the same players, the result would be hugely different. I did wonder if by first-class he meant a first-class setup as opposed to literally first-class, though I see no harm in rating a multi-day three-day tournament as first-class. PS: Besides RTD, I think he'll possibly be the first Dutch player we have a picture of! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrew nixon. You have new messages at AssociateAffiliate's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"United States of America Cricket Association: Andrew you would have to be a complete idiot to believe that one person is running this page. You see the thing about a machine is that it takes many parts to keep it going."

"United States of America Cricket Association: sorry Andrew Nixon I meant atheists not *idiot*"... can't help laugh, at them of course!!!! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On changing the subject to who will people vote for, with the USACA clown saying the first President to hold a cricket bat, got to say your response has made my day! "You're voting for the first US president to pose with a cricket bat? Is George Washington allowed to run for another term? He was a cricket player after all." Like Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew, you are correct in that there wasn't an official Final in the 1973 Women's World Cup. However the England-Australia match was a de facto final both in terms of scheduling and impact much in the same way that the 1950 FIFA World Cup final match between Uruguay and Brazil was. Wikipedia designates this match as the Final. Clicking FINAL redirects the page to : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uruguay_v_Brazil_(1950_FIFA_World_Cup) ). Bigbenboa (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand your frustration at a discussion going in a way you don't agree with, really I can, but your comments were ungracious and, as such, really not like you. I'm surprised and worried about you. --Dweller (talk) 11:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm far, far less bothered about the outcome of the discussion (either way) than I am by your response to it. You're a respected and valued Wikipedian who isn't known for blowing his top at others. Even on a big issue - and is this "big"?

Forgive my hypothesising and amateur shrinkery on someone I've never met, but I don't think your reaction is about this discussion at all. I've compiled some hopefully not too patronising suggestions you might find interesting at

WP:TEA, anyway. Hope I can be of help in some way. --Dweller (talk) 12:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Andrew nixon. You have new messages at BlackJack's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

----Jack | ^{talk page} 12:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

Thank you for your hard work in cricket. I am very curious about European cricket . I want that every nation will play and watch cricket religiously. Would you please inform me - 1. Why cricket is not popular in Europe? 2. Is cricket gaining popularity in Europe? If yes, then how much? 3. which format is ideal to popularize cricket in Europe ? Imrankabirhossain (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andrew nixon, The pages

Hello, Andrew. If you're still looking in, I think you'll be interested in this AfD. The player recently played for Singapore in WCL3; the WP:CRIN criterion being WCL6 as you will recall. Hope all is well with you. Regards, Jack | ^{talk page} 14:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bikash Dali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikash Dali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SeytX (talk) 22:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. Red Jay (talk) 08:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrew nixon. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrew nixon. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew. Totally agree with your article, esp. the bit titled "ICC barely acknowledging records set in associate matches". Have a great 2020. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Richard Wodehouse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks significant coverage in RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. buidhe 00:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Wodehouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Wodehouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. buidhe 09:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

John Allen (Irish cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Allen (Irish cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Former first-class cricket club has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew - hope you are well. I know you're not active on WP, but incase you do check your talkpage from time-to-time, I just wanted to thank you for your column on Cricket Europe. I always enjoy reading it and your latest one containing a piece on the Commonwealth Games qualifying, and the lack of a mention about this on the ICC, is something that really bugs me about the ICC. Still nothing about the CWC League 2 in Namibia taking place, adding extra matches, and then been cancelled... Anyway, hope you have a great Christmas and a happy new year. Ho, ho, ho. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only just seen this which shows how often I check it! Thanks for your kind words. Andrew nixon (talk) 09:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Solomon Islands national cricket team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable national cricket team. It appears to have been defunct since at least 1999. Prior to that it played few matches and was not well organised. Fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cricket in the Solomon Islands

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Henry Terry

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Henry Terry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Terry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 09:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Birkett

The article

Arthur Birkett has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:SPORTCRIT #5. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frederick Cuming

The article Frederick Cuming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:SPORTCRIT #5. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Montagu Toller

The article Montagu Toller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:SPORTCRIT #5. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfred Bowerman

The article Alfred Bowerman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:SPORTCRIT #5. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Powlesland

The article

Alfred Powlesland has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:NOLYMPICS, as only two teams participated. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Corner

The article

Harry Corner has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:NOLYMPICS, as only two teams participated. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Burchell

The article

Francis Burchell has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:NOLYMPICS, as only two teams participated. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

William Anderson (cricketer, born 1859)

The article

William Anderson (cricketer, born 1859) has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of

WP:SIGCOV, no additional sources were available at the French wikipedia, and WikiProject Cricket

was unable to help.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Montagu Toller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Montagu Toller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montagu Toller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alfred Bowerman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Bowerman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Bowerman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Arthur Birkett

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Arthur Birkett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Birkett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frederick Cuming for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Cuming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Cuming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 08:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Harry Corner

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Harry Corner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Corner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Francis Burchell

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Francis Burchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Burchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 08:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

T. K. Sukumaran

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

T. K. Sukumaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. K. Sukumaran (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 14:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Easan Sinnathamby

The article

Easan Sinnathamby has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:SIGCOV

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grahame Cruickshanks

The article Grahame Cruickshanks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail

WP:SIGCOV

. The main source is a statistical database which can be very unreliable. The piece about his death in Berlin during WWII looks very dubious and has been challenged.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BoJó | talk UTC 06:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of W. Browning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W. Browning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Browning until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoJó | talk UTC 15:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C. B. K. Beachcroft

The article C. B. K. Beachcroft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and SIGCOV. BoJó | talk UTC 15:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BoJó | talk UTC 15:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Anderson (American cricketer)

The article Robert Anderson (American cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Exclusively reliant on stats on database as sources. Could not find significant coverage of the subject to suggest that it passes

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 04:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Egyptian cricketers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Egyptian cricketers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AA (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]