User talk:Aspireforintelligence

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aspireforintelligence. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aspireforintelligence|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

• You recently added a photograph of the Steve Lott to his article and listed the photo as own work. What is your relationship with Steve Lott? If you have been hired to write/work on this or any other Wikipedia article the Terms of Use require the disclosures noted in the template and, recently, that you provide links to any sites where you advertise. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Jbh ^Talk 01:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thank you for showing an interest to my work. I must state that I do not get any kind of a financial benefit, nor direct or indirect compensation for editing and writing articles. I write different articles which is easy to verify by my input. I have asked a journalist I know, who recently was in the Boxing Hall of Fame to take a photo of Steve Lott for me.Aspireforintelligence (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt response. Our

copyright policy requires that the actual author provide copyright release. It is not acceptable for you to upload another's work as 'own work'. You can have the photographer send release information to [email protected]. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Jbh ^Talk 16:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

See the deletion nomination over on Commons. Jbh ^Talk 16:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • If I may kindly ask: is it about who actually "took the photo" or about who "has the rights" for the photo?Aspireforintelligence (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have explicitly obtained the rights to the photo and have a release from the photographer transfering their copyright to you in toto the release needs to come from the photographer. If the work has been released by the photographer under a compatible license elsewhere then documenting that is also acceptable.

WP:COPYOTHERS] has more information on that. Jbh ^Talk 15:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• • Ok, I will tell the journalist to send an email, as I don't have much time to spend on this. Thanks for a clarificationAspireforintelligence (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aspireforintelligence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At the risk of being accused of "outing" you, I will state that you have contacted me by telephone and told me who you are. You undoubtedly have a

I have moved your article back to draft space. Please wait for it to be properly reviewed. Do not copy it back to mainspace. But the best advice I can give you is to trot out my usual mantra: kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no

• Correct, I did phone you and wanted to get some recommendations on how to improve the article, but the line got disconnected for some reason. I am a journalist and it is very improbable that I can benefit from a book which is free. I write about things that are interesting for me. It is not my first article, among other articles I wrote
  The Greatness of the Sword. I as a volunteer, felt really bad in regard to the way you wrote about me, I try to make Wikipedia better and spend my time on it. — Aspireforintelligence (talk) 23:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Roger, thank you for the advice, but the whole point is that the Non-compromised Pendulum is not a commercial project, the book is not sold, it is a tribute in the memory of Cus D'Amato, it can be downloaded by anybody in Google Books https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=hABrDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false and I am a volunteer of the project, I don't receive any kind of financial or/and non-financial benefit from it. The same applies for the wikipedia, I am a volunteer in here just the way you are and spend my own time to create articles on the topics I know and find interesting. Aspireforintelligence (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found your choice of PRhese as a possible "sponsor" rather curious. He seems to be more concerned with general quality control rather than specifically boxing topics. Instead, look at the main section of category:boxing books. It lists six books. Three of them were created in 2003/2004 by the same person. He is still active. Try asking him for help! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, RHaworth. Roger, please see this editing. Aspireforintelligence (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No reliable and independent evidence of notability. The great majority of the sources are very clearly press releases - they use identical wording and the others seem to be providing evidence of the vires of the two authors, not their book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Non-compromised Pendulum
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   16:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]