User talk:AstroidXD02

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Namibia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yue💌 21:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok Thank you for informing me i will surely not make this mistake again AstroidXD02 (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bangladesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Aazaru. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maldives have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.--Aazaru (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the article Japan. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 05:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 05:49, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you are engaged in an article
  article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 03:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 17:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? AstroidXD02 (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 🌈 论 16:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to state this very clearly for likely the last time, since I've said it several times before: articles are not generally required to use any particular template, like {{native name}}, just because that template is in use on other comparable articles. There is no real problem if an article like Germany uses that template in its infobox or not, and when such choices don't make a real difference, it's best to minimize disruption by letting things stay as they are. It's a really bad habit on here to edit war over deeply trivial matters like that. If you keep edit warring instead of engaging in discussions, you're likely to get blocked for disruptive editing. Remsense 🌈 论 16:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt remove anything from there i Just Added the Language Name (German) and nothing else because that Name is written In German AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and another thing is that Native name includes the language name while lang didnt show the Name of the Language because of that i edited that AstroidXD02 (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know what the template does. It's not necessary to use it on France, as one example, and we are not required to use it. People generally know French is the official language in France, and such countries are cases where the template has the least purpose, and essentially just takes up space for no good reason.

On the other hand, the {{native name}} template is particularly useful to use on articles about states with multiple official languages, or states whose official language isn't common knowledge. It is a case-by-case decision. We don't have to use exactly the same tools on every article of a kind. Remsense 🌈 论 16:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw Brazil's Article it also includes (lang) Even tho everyone did not Know Brazil's Official Language another Exmaple Is Austria and their Official Language Is German so is its not necessary that everyone knowns the language name AstroidXD02 (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My primary point is it doesn't matter that much either way, so the norm (

WP:RETAIN) in all such cases is to leave it alone, because otherwise there is fighting back and forth over non-issues instead of substantial improvements. If you aren't going to engage with this point, I can't force you, but I can only phrase it so many ways before it seems you don't care about listening to myself or others. Remsense 🌈 论 17:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

It does not need to be used. Moreover, like I said directly above, it is generally disruptive to impose it on articles where it isn't already used without a particular reason or the agreement of others. Remsense 🌈 论 16:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You do not seem to understand that

• Lao official: Our goal is to strengthen the people’s democratic state
• The 11th Plenary Session of the sitting Central Committee of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party: strengthen the people's democratic state
• Article 2 of the Laotian constitution: "The State of the Lao People's Democratic Republic is a people's democratic state."
• This is also sourced by third party sources in the section "Classification" of the People's Democracy article.
• In accordance with Historical materialism not everything can, by definition, be socialist. It is based on specific base and superstructural relations. read the articles on the national democratic state, people's democratic and the socialist state (communism) for more information.

TheUzbek (talk) 11:35, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]