User talk:Axem Titanium

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Titanium, I noticed your opinion posted on the discussion regarding the Esports page Dexerto's credibility a while back, could you kindly assess the credibility and reliability of a few Esports articles pages, I feel you understand the credibility best and will be able to give a proper opinion. The pages are Win.GG, Esportmaniacos (in Spanish) and Esports.net. Also there is an ongoing AFD, that I have proposed regarding Kkatamina and the article pages I had mentioned above, have been referenced in the article, if you could provide an opinion on the subject's notability as of now and the page, it would be great for the discussion. thanks again! Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 20:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've saw your reverse of my edits on the FFXIV pages specially the sections. I want so you an article on plot to explain why I made those edits, so you can understand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_(narrative) ExplorerX19 (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

WT:MOSVG. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah, no shit, Anton, at least I don't stan a fictional dung beetle while simultaneously dragging a stick across a glorified ukulele and calling it "music" and maybe re-(re)-read

Maybe it is you who should reconsider before

"shooting one's mouth off", so to speak. Axem Titanium (talk) 07:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Per the AfD conversation, I'm starting a userspace draft here for Guido Henkel to try and fix stuff. Man, the article really is in rough shape and you were right about nuking and starting over here. I'm basically cutting out extraneous detail and rewriting what's already there, but with all of the sources being in German, this is going to be nightmarish. Feel free to hop in if you find yourself with some extra time (no big either way!), I feel like I'm going down an Amico shaped rabbithole and would love to jump in with friends instead of alone, if that makes sense. Nomader (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing this. Looks like you already pushed the changes to the live article. I don't have a huge amount of time to edit these days but I'll poke around where I can. The Amico situation is unenviable and thank you for your efforts to tackle it. The whole thing is a big yikes from me. Axem Titanium (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gerda Arendt Wow has it really been that long already? :) Axem Titanium (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Endwalker characters.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Axem Titanium

Thank you for creating

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Marlboro (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Marlboro (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article of Tifa is going through a Gar and I tried rewriting the reception to improve it. Could you revise it if possible? Cheers Tintor2 (talk) 01:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Yeah, I'll take a look when I get the chance. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Bayesian Wikipedians has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ReneeWrites (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I hope you have a merry Christmas and a happy new year! ReneeWrites (talk) 13:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the well wishes! I appreciate your contributions to the project. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Axem Titanium,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Shooterwalker (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Shooterwalker (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying tone down the repetitive reception sections of Squall Leonhart and Tidus while expanding on the creation to avoid a similar reassessment that Tifa had. I think the reception sections covers most of the two character's better know aspects by the media. Still, I couldn't find too much about Squall's Kingdom Hearts design (which is kinda obvious when comparing it to Amano's artwork) even though it is used a lot not only there but also Dissidia. Feel free to give it a look. I asked Protodrake about the Japanese actor who voiced Squall but he also couldn't find anything about it. Cheers. Tintor2 (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give them a look when I have some time over the next few days. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you find any source for at least expanding an analysis section add it to further reading. It helped a lot to balance Cloud's article (and I added some free images related to the subject). I also added a Roman king too to Noctis' article based on Tabata's commentary and the reception.Tintor2 (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. Been pretty busy these few weeks so I'm not sure when I'll get to them. 🤞 Axem Titanium (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at articles from other sources or videos from popular anime tubers about this issue, you can easily see screenshots of several VAs directly referring to their interpretation of the character as a "Middle Eastern queer character" with a hint that they had to choose the right actress for the sake of "unique and rare representations". It's not essential, but it was clearly one of the complaints about diversity in casting. Also, I added "it seems", because apart from the Semitic name and dark skin color (and only the father, her mother clearly has European or Japanese roots), the ethnicity of the character is not actually discussed anywhere, and she can just as well be just tanned. Of course, only if you are not going to deny that Arabs or Jews are white. And again, this is all without regard to whether ethnic roots still play any role in the world of G-Witch, given the clearly fictitious names and fantastic setting. Solaire the knight (talk) 03:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it failed verification in the source, nothing more. "Seems to be implied" is a bit redundant in English and doesn't necessarily flow well. "Seems" and "implied" have overlapping meanings. Better to pick one or the other. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? In my language, "implies" refers to something that subtly refers to something, so I used to be unhappy when "implies" was stated without "it seems". Anyway, I added this because in the sources I wrote about it, several VAs referred to the rarity of such a representation. But since the specified source does not make any emphasis on this, it really does not matter. I'm not going to fight an edit war for a small piece of text that doesn't affect the overall text, so I've only returned "it seems" as still important to me. So, in English, "means" still has the character of uncertainty? Solaire the knight (talk) 07:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both "seem" and "imply" connote uncertainty. "Imply" has the added connotation of intentionality (e.g. the author intended this implication, but did not want to outright state it) whereas "seem" does not necessarily connote intention. "Seems to be implied" is technically grammatical but it's wordy and most copyediters would try to shorten the phrase to be more concise. Axem Titanium (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I was trying to avoid, because people often use "implied" as a loophole to lend weight to their speculations (along with "hinted"), and dark skin combined with a Semitic name doesn't tell you anything about the intentions of the authors, especially in a universe where the future have mixed people's population. Moreover, as far as I remember, in a promotional interview, the producers directly drew attention to the idea of ethnic ​​​​diversity in their ideas for the future of the show. In general, you want to say that implied is ambiguous, but still implies an indication of some kind of intention? Solaire the knight (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"In general, you want to say that implied is ambiguous, but still implies an indication of some kind of intention?" Yes that's the way I understand the nuance of that word. Someone implied something with an intention. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:24, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then how do you view the idea of ​​rewriting this in the context of "it's likely/plausible, but it's not explicitly stated anywhere"? I doubt that Suletta is just tanned (I do not know the practice, but I heard that in the USA the ethnicity of children of mixed marriages is determined by a non-white parent), but it seems to me that the definition of ethnicity by name and skin color is still speculative. Solaire the knight (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of additional sources that more explicitly address it, I don't know how much more can be written on the topic. From the evidence, I think it's pretty clear that Suletta's heritage is MENA but my evaluation isn't the one that matters. Obviously it's not an accident that she looks the way she looks (i.e. someone made her look that way on purpose), but we can't say any more for sure. I think "implied" is the right level of vagueness to use in the article for now. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the sources, all I saw in the interview in relation to her ethnic origin is the words of the producer that "this is the future, so we decided to give Suletta a darker skin color, assuming that in the future all the peoples mixed up and we wanted to display it's diversity." Not literally, of course, but close to it. Personally, I would assume that her roots probably refer to Pakistanis or Indians as typical non-Japanese migrants (such characters are quite popular in Japanese media these days, remember "Do it Yourself"), but that would also be speculation. All I can say is that she is probably a child of mixed marriage given her mother. Solaire the knight (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, anonymous is indeed motivated by a political conflict of interest. For example, he directly sees the presence of this text in the article as a "political attack". It's funny that he directly wrote about this right after another user tried to convince me that the anonymous person was not discussing the case itself, instead of the validity of adding it to the article. Anonymous even supported him, but still did not realize that the next comment proves my case and refutes his defender. Solaire the knight (talk) 06:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to engage with people whose arguments lack substance. The lack of substance will be self-evident to the closer of the discussion. Axem Titanium (talk) 07:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Axem Titanium (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fastest-selling products and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-played video games by player count—greatly appreciate the Jagged 85/Maestro2016 cleanup. JOEBRO64 18:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it! Axem Titanium (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I was a little cranky with that first AfD comment, so I thank you for responding to it in good spirits and giving me the benefit of the doubt. jp×g 05:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good. Disagreements happen and all sides believe in the strength of their convictions. I enjoy your work on the Signpost. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Your joke at the De Mirage AfD was great 10/10. I always love to see that kind of humor around here. Thanks for keeping this place fun. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 05:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated

I added a list of invisible sources to the Reception section of Kefka. I don't really feel like expanding it, just copyediting and restructuring, so feel free to implement them if you like. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Axem Titanium (talk) 15:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know you mentioned you had some sources for the articles but were busy, would you be able to add them to the ref ideas template on the talk page? I can work on them after I get Wooloo to GA.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man: Sorry, I've been out of town this week and just catching up on messages. I can't seem to find all of them at the moment, but I still have [1] and [2] open in a browser tab so those must have been among them 😅. I think I'll have some time to locate them and work on the article tomorrow afternoon. Thanks for your help in the meantime! Axem Titanium (talk) 02:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for

Hey do you wanna be a part of a Discord group chat created to collaborate on improving character articles - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cukie Gherkin: Oops, must have forgotten to reply to this message. I'm not sure I'd be that active, but I may lurk from time to time if you want to send me the invite link. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:22, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Axem Titanium: [3] - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I already added the Polygon article at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. I have removed the duplicate. Thanks. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Minor characters in Kirby: Right Back at Ya! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 25 § Minor characters in Kirby: Right Back at Ya! until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sanzaru has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 3 § Sanzaru until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, it's been 10 years already? Amazing! Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice on organizing the Legend of Zelda characters page. I went and organized the characters by their games, and it looks a lot better. I'm sure there is still things that can be done to make it look better, but this is a great first start. Thank you again! HylianNerd (talk) 12:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, welcome to editing! I'll poke around and see what I can help with when I get a chance. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One quick thing I would note is that using detailed

wikilink directly to the discussion about the change, especially in this case since it didn't happen on the article's talk page. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]